emacs-orgmode@gnu.org archives
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: "Sébastien Gendre" <seb@k-7.ch>
To: Milan Zamazal <pdm@zamazal.org>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Subject: Re: How do you manage complex project with Org-mode
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2022 21:58:56 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <874k4gt69f.fsf@k-7.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87lextgz68.fsf@zamazal.org>

Hello Milan,

Thank you for your reply and advice. :)

Indeed, using deadline with longer in-advance warnings is a good idea. I
completely forget this feature. Using priority and split big task
is also a good advice. Today I pay attention to keep Org-mode as simple as
possible. It was not the case in the past and few times I stopped using
Org-mode because of that.



Milan Zamazal <pdm@zamazal.org> writes:

>>>>>> "SG" == Sébastien Gendre <seb@k-7.ch> writes:
>
>     SG> But, as a student, I regularly have big and important projects
>     SG> to do for the school. The kind of project who need several days
>     SG> to be done, with deadlines too soon, and if you fail one them
>     SG> the consequences can be disastrous. And generally, I have to
>     SG> many of these project in the same time and not enough time to do
>     SG> all the work. So, I also need to follow the progress of each
>     SG> project to choose which is sufficiently advanced to be stop for
>     SG> the benefit of another less advanced project.
>
>     SG> And I don't know how to manage this kind of projects with
>     SG> Org-mode. How to do it, without failing a 6 days project because
>     SG> I spent to much time on something else and I have only 3 days
>     SG> left with 3 half-day important appointment I cannot cancel. I
>     SG> can't risk failing a single one of these project by trying. So,
>     SG> when I am in a period with a lot of these projects, I stop using
>     SG> Org-mode and concentrate on doing these project as fast as I
>     SG> can. And because I often have this kind of project, I spend most
>     SG> of the year without being able to use Org-mode.
>
> Hi, I’d join the suggestion to keep things simple in the beginning.  My
> task flow is different from yours but in order not to miss really
> important things, I use the following:
>
> - Deadlines, with longer in-advance warnings when needed (e.g. “-3w” in
>   DEADLINE).
>
> - I use priority A for and only for stuff that is on risk of really bad
>   consequences if not handled ASAP.  And I schedule such stuff to a
>   future date if it doesn’t make sense to work on it now for any reason.
>
> As for progress, I’d say that if you don’t know how far are you with
> your short-term tasks and which of them require attention currently then
> you might have a problem with your workflow.  Maybe you are too
> overloaded or you don’t split your time among the tasks appropriately.
> Org mode is a good tool to implement support for different workflows but
> cannot help if a used workflow doesn’t work very well for you.  Again,
> starting simple with Org mode and paying attention first to how you work
> and how it could be improved generally might be a good idea (and a
> life-long process for many of us).
>
> Regards,
> Milan



  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-02 21:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-01  1:43 Sébastien Gendre
2022-03-01  4:03 ` Matt
2022-03-02 19:44   ` Sébastien Gendre
2022-03-01  6:43 ` Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide
2022-03-02 20:00   ` Sébastien Gendre
2022-03-01  7:12 ` Tim Cross
2022-03-02 20:33   ` Sébastien Gendre
2022-03-02 21:55     ` Tim Cross
2022-03-20  5:16       ` Ihor Radchenko
2022-03-20 21:24         ` Tim Cross
2022-03-21  9:25           ` Ihor Radchenko
2022-03-20  5:06     ` Ihor Radchenko
2022-03-01 19:26 ` Antonio Carlos Padoan Junior
2022-03-02 20:53   ` Sébastien Gendre
2022-03-01 21:06 ` Milan Zamazal
2022-03-02 20:58   ` Sébastien Gendre [this message]
2022-03-02 16:29 ` Quiliro Ordóñez
2022-03-02 21:05   ` Sébastien Gendre
2022-03-01  4:38 Eric Abrahamsen
2022-03-02 21:26 ` Sébastien Gendre
2022-03-02 23:35   ` Eric Abrahamsen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.orgmode.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=874k4gt69f.fsf@k-7.ch \
    --to=seb@k-7.ch \
    --cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
    --cc=pdm@zamazal.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).