* Strange behaviour of produced latex-pdf
@ 2011-02-02 11:30 Martin Weigele
2011-02-02 16:38 ` Thomas S. Dye
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Martin Weigele @ 2011-02-02 11:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Emacs-orgmode
Dear all, have encountered the following strange behaviour in producing latex-
pdf from a standard outline, C-c C-e d . One of many top nodes is seemingly
arbitrarily not broken down into subnodes. It works fine, however, when
producing html. Emacs 23.1.1; org-7.4 manually installed; ubuntu 10.04 LTS.
The following declarations are used:
#+TITLE: Blah
#+LaTeX_CLASS: book
#+LATEX_HEADER: \usepackage{a5}\usepackage{german}
#+LANGUAGE: DE
#+TEXT: Blah
While most top nodes are broken down like
\chapter{blah}
\section{blah}
etc..
...one chapter is simply not broken down. I have checked the org file with vi,
there is no evidence that anything is wrong in the orgfile structure. All go
*chapter
**section
***subsection
etc.
Like others, the unrefined chapter contains only (sub)headlines, no text yet.
Any ideas?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: Strange behaviour of produced latex-pdf 2011-02-02 11:30 Strange behaviour of produced latex-pdf Martin Weigele @ 2011-02-02 16:38 ` Thomas S. Dye 2011-02-02 22:26 ` Eric S Fraga 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Thomas S. Dye @ 2011-02-02 16:38 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Martin Weigele; +Cc: Emacs-orgmode On Feb 2, 2011, at 1:30 AM, Martin Weigele wrote: > Dear all, have encountered the following strange behaviour in > producing latex- > pdf from a standard outline, C-c C-e d . One of many top nodes is > seemingly > arbitrarily not broken down into subnodes. It works fine, however, > when > producing html. Emacs 23.1.1; org-7.4 manually installed; ubuntu > 10.04 LTS. > > The following declarations are used: > > #+TITLE: Blah > #+LaTeX_CLASS: book > #+LATEX_HEADER: \usepackage{a5}\usepackage{german} > #+LANGUAGE: DE > #+TEXT: Blah > > While most top nodes are broken down like > \chapter{blah} > \section{blah} > etc.. > > ...one chapter is simply not broken down. I have checked the org > file with vi, > there is no evidence that anything is wrong in the orgfile > structure. All go > *chapter > **section > ***subsection > > etc. > > Like others, the unrefined chapter contains only (sub)headlines, no > text yet. > Any ideas? Aloha Martin, I don't understand what you mean by "not broken down." Could you provide an example of the LaTeX output? All the best, Tom ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Strange behaviour of produced latex-pdf 2011-02-02 16:38 ` Thomas S. Dye @ 2011-02-02 22:26 ` Eric S Fraga 2011-02-02 22:53 ` Martin Weigele 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Eric S Fraga @ 2011-02-02 22:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Thomas S. Dye; +Cc: Martin Weigele, Emacs-orgmode "Thomas S. Dye" <tsd@tsdye.com> writes: > On Feb 2, 2011, at 1:30 AM, Martin Weigele wrote: > >> Dear all, have encountered the following strange behaviour in >> producing latex- >> pdf from a standard outline, C-c C-e d . One of many top nodes is >> seemingly >> arbitrarily not broken down into subnodes. It works fine, however, >> when >> producing html. Emacs 23.1.1; org-7.4 manually installed; ubuntu >> 10.04 LTS. [...] >> Like others, the unrefined chapter contains only (sub)headlines, no >> text yet. >> Any ideas? > > Aloha Martin, > > I don't understand what you mean by "not broken down." Could you > provide an example of the LaTeX output? I also do not necessarily understand what is meant by that but I can say that I recently had some problems with the latex exporter, especially over the weekend, not exporting the full document the way I would have expected: whole sub-trees did not get exported to the latex although they did come out in an HTML export, for instance. Unfortunately, I was unable to reproduce this problem with a small example and the document where it was exhibited is large and definitely not distributable. Fortunately, the problem seems to have disappeared and my latex export works just fine now -- and the document has not changed (it's under revision control). So, I can suggest to Martin: upgrade to the latest git version of org and see if that helps? eric -- : Eric S Fraga (GnuPG: 0xC89193D8FFFCF67D) in Emacs 24.0.50.1 : using Org-mode version 7.4 (release_7.4.302.gd840.dirty) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Strange behaviour of produced latex-pdf 2011-02-02 22:26 ` Eric S Fraga @ 2011-02-02 22:53 ` Martin Weigele 2011-02-02 23:06 ` Thomas S. Dye 2011-02-02 23:44 ` Martin Weigele 0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Martin Weigele @ 2011-02-02 22:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: emacs-orgmode Am Mittwoch, 2. Februar 2011, um 23:26:05 schrieb Eric S Fraga: > "Thomas S. Dye" <tsd@tsdye.com> writes: > > On Feb 2, 2011, at 1:30 AM, Martin Weigele wrote: > >> Dear all, have encountered the following strange behaviour in > >> producing latex- > >> pdf from a standard outline, C-c C-e d . One of many top nodes is > >> seemingly > >> arbitrarily not broken down into subnodes. It works fine, however, > >> when > >> producing html. Emacs 23.1.1; org-7.4 manually installed; ubuntu > >> 10.04 LTS. > > [...] > > >> Like others, the unrefined chapter contains only (sub)headlines, no > >> text yet. > >> Any ideas? > > > > Aloha Martin, > > > > I don't understand what you mean by "not broken down." Could you > > provide an example of the LaTeX output? > > I also do not necessarily understand what is meant by that but I can say > that I recently had some problems with the latex exporter, especially > over the weekend, not exporting the full document the way I would have > expected: whole sub-trees did not get exported to the latex although > they did come out in an HTML export, for instance. > > Unfortunately, I was unable to reproduce this problem with a small > example and the document where it was exhibited is large and > definitely not distributable. > > Fortunately, the problem seems to have disappeared and my latex export > works just fine now -- and the document has not changed (it's under > revision control). > > So, I can suggest to Martin: upgrade to the latest git version of org > and see if that helps? > > eric Thanks Eric, it appears that the fact that a whole subtree indeed disappeared from the latex output had left me kind of "speechless" :-) . No the problem does not go away with latest git sources. Martin ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Strange behaviour of produced latex-pdf 2011-02-02 22:53 ` Martin Weigele @ 2011-02-02 23:06 ` Thomas S. Dye 2011-02-03 0:23 ` Eric S Fraga 2011-02-02 23:44 ` Martin Weigele 1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Thomas S. Dye @ 2011-02-02 23:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Martin Weigele; +Cc: emacs-orgmode On Feb 2, 2011, at 12:53 PM, Martin Weigele wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 2. Februar 2011, um 23:26:05 schrieb Eric S Fraga: >> "Thomas S. Dye" <tsd@tsdye.com> writes: >>> On Feb 2, 2011, at 1:30 AM, Martin Weigele wrote: >>>> Dear all, have encountered the following strange behaviour in >>>> producing latex- >>>> pdf from a standard outline, C-c C-e d . One of many top nodes is >>>> seemingly >>>> arbitrarily not broken down into subnodes. It works fine, however, >>>> when >>>> producing html. Emacs 23.1.1; org-7.4 manually installed; ubuntu >>>> 10.04 LTS. >> >> [...] >> >>>> Like others, the unrefined chapter contains only (sub)headlines, no >>>> text yet. >>>> Any ideas? >>> >>> Aloha Martin, >>> >>> I don't understand what you mean by "not broken down." Could you >>> provide an example of the LaTeX output? >> >> I also do not necessarily understand what is meant by that but I >> can say >> that I recently had some problems with the latex exporter, especially >> over the weekend, not exporting the full document the way I would >> have >> expected: whole sub-trees did not get exported to the latex although >> they did come out in an HTML export, for instance. >> >> Unfortunately, I was unable to reproduce this problem with a small >> example and the document where it was exhibited is large and >> definitely not distributable. >> >> Fortunately, the problem seems to have disappeared and my latex >> export >> works just fine now -- and the document has not changed (it's under >> revision control). >> >> So, I can suggest to Martin: upgrade to the latest git version of org >> and see if that helps? >> >> eric > > Thanks Eric, it appears that the fact that a whole subtree indeed > disappeared > from the latex output had left me kind of "speechless" :-) . No the > problem > does not go away with latest git sources. > Martin Aloha Martin, I'm speechless, too. I haven't seen this particular bug yet, but will keep my eyes open for it. Thanks for pointing it out. All the best, Tom ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Strange behaviour of produced latex-pdf 2011-02-02 23:06 ` Thomas S. Dye @ 2011-02-03 0:23 ` Eric S Fraga 0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Eric S Fraga @ 2011-02-03 0:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Thomas S. Dye; +Cc: Martin Weigele, emacs-orgmode "Thomas S. Dye" <tsd@tsdye.com> writes: [...] > I'm speechless, too. I haven't seen this particular bug yet, but will > keep my eyes open for it. Thanks for pointing it out. Over the past year, I have had some strange behaviour in my latex exports appear every now and again, and it usually exhibits itself by not exporting everything I would expect (only to latex; fine to html in every case). Unfortunately, I've never been able to isolate the problem. I will, however, inform the list the next time it happens to me. I'm glad that Martin has found his problem but it appears his is completely different than what I have experienced in that, in his case, the latex file includes everything... Is that so Martin? eric -- : Eric S Fraga (GnuPG: 0xC89193D8FFFCF67D) in Emacs 24.0.50.1 : using Org-mode version 7.4 (release_7.4.302.gd840.dirty) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Strange behaviour of produced latex-pdf 2011-02-02 22:53 ` Martin Weigele 2011-02-02 23:06 ` Thomas S. Dye @ 2011-02-02 23:44 ` Martin Weigele 1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Martin Weigele @ 2011-02-02 23:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: emacs-orgmode OK the disappearing subtree seems to have been caused by my declaration of a non-existant "a5" latex (style) package. Works now fine with "a4". Thanks for your help. Took me a while to find out where to look for the latex log file. :-) Am Mittwoch, 2. Februar 2011, um 23:53:05 schrieb Martin Weigele: > Am Mittwoch, 2. Februar 2011, um 23:26:05 schrieb Eric S Fraga: > > "Thomas S. Dye" <tsd@tsdye.com> writes: > > > On Feb 2, 2011, at 1:30 AM, Martin Weigele wrote: > > >> Dear all, have encountered the following strange behaviour in > > >> producing latex- > > >> pdf from a standard outline, C-c C-e d . One of many top nodes is > > >> seemingly > > >> arbitrarily not broken down into subnodes. It works fine, however, > > >> when > > >> producing html. Emacs 23.1.1; org-7.4 manually installed; ubuntu > > >> 10.04 LTS. > > > > [...] > > > > >> Like others, the unrefined chapter contains only (sub)headlines, no > > >> text yet. > > >> Any ideas? > > > > > > Aloha Martin, > > > > > > I don't understand what you mean by "not broken down." Could you > > > provide an example of the LaTeX output? > > > > I also do not necessarily understand what is meant by that but I can say > > that I recently had some problems with the latex exporter, especially > > over the weekend, not exporting the full document the way I would have > > expected: whole sub-trees did not get exported to the latex although > > they did come out in an HTML export, for instance. > > > > Unfortunately, I was unable to reproduce this problem with a small > > example and the document where it was exhibited is large and > > definitely not distributable. > > > > Fortunately, the problem seems to have disappeared and my latex export > > works just fine now -- and the document has not changed (it's under > > revision control). > > > > So, I can suggest to Martin: upgrade to the latest git version of org > > and see if that helps? > > > > eric > > Thanks Eric, it appears that the fact that a whole subtree indeed > disappeared from the latex output had left me kind of "speechless" :-) . > No the problem does not go away with latest git sources. > Martin > > _______________________________________________ > Emacs-orgmode mailing list > Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. > Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-02-03 0:24 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2011-02-02 11:30 Strange behaviour of produced latex-pdf Martin Weigele 2011-02-02 16:38 ` Thomas S. Dye 2011-02-02 22:26 ` Eric S Fraga 2011-02-02 22:53 ` Martin Weigele 2011-02-02 23:06 ` Thomas S. Dye 2011-02-03 0:23 ` Eric S Fraga 2011-02-02 23:44 ` Martin Weigele
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).