emacs-orgmode@gnu.org archives
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Robert Pluim <rpluim@gmail.com>
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Subject: Re: should the mail list be splitted resp. sub-tagged ?
Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2011 10:56:27 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <pknzkrfsmgk.fsf@this.is.really.invalid> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 87k4ijbtmy.fsf@Rainer.invalid

Achim Gratz <Stromeko@nexgo.de> writes:

> Robert Pluim <rpluim@gmail.com> writes:
>> Triage is for *computers* to do, they're much better at it than humans.
>
> Then let your MUA strip the tag off for you and live a happier life.
>
>> Also, those markers in the subject are obnoxious and *really* annoying,
>> and take up valuable screen space.  Please don't clutter up the org-mode
>> emails for zero benefit.
>
> They are very valuable when you need to quickly check things from a
> computer where you don't have set up your filtering for instance.  Plus
> they are indispensable for everyone who decides to not filter mail into
> folders or anything like that.  They don't force you to not filter, so
> why should you force them to change their workflow?

Using your same argument from above, why don't they configure their MUA
to add the tag?  Why should I be forced to change my workflow to strip
it? (and the tags are not 'indispensable' for human triage: you can
display the To/CC or List-Id headers, which will contain org-mode as well).

>> org-mode list email has a List-Id header, the list software has already
>> taken care of it for you.  I fail to see how much can go wrong with
>> filtering on that, configure it once and you're done. (or read the list
>> via gmane, all nicely split out for you).
>
> This header is there for software to see, not for humans.  There is
> multiple redundancy in both the headers and the tagging of the subject
> line and this is what makes things resilient.  And yes, I read the list
> via Gmane/GNUS, but that doesn't mean everyone has to do it the same
> way.

Right, which is why I argue for the minimal simplicity of just setting
the header, and letting people take care of anything else they want to
do afterwards.

Anyway, I think we've reached the end of this discussion, it's
definitely not relevant to org-mode anymore.  Whoever maintains the list
will decide what they prefer.

Robert

  reply	other threads:[~2011-01-05  9:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-12-17  8:52 should the mail list be splitted resp. sub-tagged ? Torsten Wagner
2010-12-17 12:15 ` Andrew J. Korty
2010-12-17 14:00   ` Giovanni Ridolfi
2010-12-17 15:56   ` Nick Dokos
2010-12-17 17:28     ` Samuel Wales
2010-12-17 15:40 ` Nick Dokos
2010-12-17 18:21 ` William Gardella
2010-12-17 20:33 ` William Gardella
2010-12-17 21:16   ` Eric S Fraga
2010-12-18 12:09 ` Torsten Wagner
2011-01-04 15:19   ` Bastien
2011-01-04 17:39     ` Štěpán Němec
2011-01-04 18:12       ` Bastien
2011-01-04 18:31         ` Jeff Horn
2011-01-04 19:49         ` Štěpán Němec
2011-01-04 20:43           ` Nick Dokos
2011-01-04 18:52       ` Nick Dokos
2011-01-04 19:25         ` Robert Pluim
2011-01-05  9:13           ` Achim Gratz
2011-01-05  9:56             ` Robert Pluim [this message]
     [not found]           ` <rpluim@gmail.com>
2011-01-04 20:02             ` Nick Dokos
2011-01-05  8:15               ` Robert Pluim
2011-05-05 14:05             ` Applying style to a paragraph for HTML export Nick Dokos
2011-05-05 14:35               ` Jambunathan K
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-05-05  9:37 Robert Pluim
2011-05-05 12:05 ` Jambunathan K
2011-05-05 12:33   ` Robert Pluim
2011-05-05 12:45     ` Jambunathan K
2011-05-05 13:16       ` Robert Pluim
2011-05-05 12:51     ` Jambunathan K

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.orgmode.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=pknzkrfsmgk.fsf@this.is.really.invalid \
    --to=rpluim@gmail.com \
    --cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).