From: "Štěpán Němec" <stepnem@gmail.com>
To: Bastien <bastien.guerry@wikimedia.fr>
Cc: Org-mode ml <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: should the mail list be splitted resp. sub-tagged ?
Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2011 18:39:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87zkrg600j.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ei8sae89.fsf@gnu.org> (Bastien's message of "Tue, 04 Jan 2011 16:19:18 +0100")
Bastien <bastien.guerry@wikimedia.fr> writes:
> Hi Torsten,
>
> Torsten Wagner <torsten.wagner@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Using [Orgmode] as a tag on the orgmode list is an arguable point.
>> Maybe the someone higher in the queue like to make a decision to
>> shorten it to [Org].
>
> I agreed this would be an improvement to use [Org].
>
> If nobody have a strong objection, I'll make this change in two days.
FWIW, I do. Having [Org] (or anything, really) prepended to the subjects
of _all_ mails coming from a list that is already uniquely identifiable
(e.g. by its address) has no information value altogether (unlike
[Babel], [PATCH] etc.) and only takes up the much precious Subject:
header space.
I have never understood why anyone would like anything like that.
If you want to somehow treat the mails from this list specially, why
don't you filter on the presence of the mailing list address in the
headers, for example?
Štěpán
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-04 17:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-17 8:52 should the mail list be splitted resp. sub-tagged ? Torsten Wagner
2010-12-17 12:15 ` Andrew J. Korty
2010-12-17 14:00 ` Giovanni Ridolfi
2010-12-17 15:56 ` Nick Dokos
2010-12-17 17:28 ` Samuel Wales
2010-12-17 15:40 ` Nick Dokos
2010-12-17 18:21 ` William Gardella
2010-12-17 20:33 ` William Gardella
2010-12-17 21:16 ` Eric S Fraga
2010-12-18 12:09 ` Torsten Wagner
2011-01-04 15:19 ` Bastien
2011-01-04 17:39 ` Štěpán Němec [this message]
2011-01-04 18:12 ` Bastien
2011-01-04 18:31 ` Jeff Horn
2011-01-04 19:49 ` Štěpán Němec
2011-01-04 20:43 ` Nick Dokos
2011-01-04 18:52 ` Nick Dokos
2011-01-04 19:25 ` Robert Pluim
2011-01-05 9:13 ` Achim Gratz
2011-01-05 9:56 ` Robert Pluim
[not found] ` <rpluim@gmail.com>
2011-01-04 20:02 ` Nick Dokos
2011-01-05 8:15 ` Robert Pluim
2011-05-05 14:05 ` Applying style to a paragraph for HTML export Nick Dokos
2011-05-05 14:35 ` Jambunathan K
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-05-05 9:37 Robert Pluim
2011-05-05 12:05 ` Jambunathan K
2011-05-05 12:33 ` Robert Pluim
2011-05-05 12:45 ` Jambunathan K
2011-05-05 13:16 ` Robert Pluim
2011-05-05 12:51 ` Jambunathan K
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.orgmode.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87zkrg600j.fsf@gmail.com \
--to=stepnem@gmail.com \
--cc=bastien.guerry@wikimedia.fr \
--cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).