Re: I'm tripping over #+BABEL: vs. #+PROPERTY:

[tsd@tsdye.com (Thomas S. Dye)]

Nick Dokos <nicholas.dokos@hp.com> writes:

> Sebastien Vauban <wxhgmqzgwmuf@spammotel.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Nick and Eric,
>> 
>> Nick Dokos wrote:
>> > Eric Schulte <eric.schulte@gmx.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Did you press C-c C-c on each property line after it was written?
>> >
>> > Just to clarify: do I really have to C-c C-c on each line? If I add a
>> > bunch of them and then do C-c C-c on one of them, shouldn't that be
>> > enough to refresh the setup?
>> 
>> I got no reaction on my idea of "automagic C-c C-c" (on 2012-03-04 Sun, see
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/emacs-orgmode@gnu.org/msg52739.html):
>> 
>>     The "automagic C-c C-c" should be NOT[1] done after each key press or some
>>     such. That certainly would be a killer feature, in its real acception:
>>     performance would be unbearable.
>> 
>>     In my mind, automatically (re-)parsing the meta options should be each time
>>     the user presses `C-c C-v C-e' (eval code blocks); that is, when the user
>>     expects his options to be taken into account.
>> 
>> Does it make sense?
>> 
>> Best regards,
>>   Seb
>> 
>> Footnotes:
>> 
>> [1] This word was missing (in the original post)!
>> 
>
> Well, it might make sense but you can try it out and let us know:
>
> - make files with 10, 100, 1000 trivial (or even empty) code blocks,
>   just enough to make sure that org-babel-execute-maybe is really called
>   on them: I think that it will be called even on empty code blocks, but
>   I'm not sure if there is some optimization in there.
>
> - measure the time it takes to export each one to html (say).
>
> - add a call to org-mode-restart into org-babel-execute-maybe, and time
>   the same operation again: how significant is the slowdown?
>
> If the slowdown is bearable in these cases, then it will be bearable in
> realistic situations, where block execution is going to be a much more
> significant fraction of the total.
>
> BTW, what's the biggest file you (all, not just Seb) have in terms of the
> number of code blocks it contains? In my case, the largest one had about
> two dozen code blocks, so the 100 case would easily cover me, but I suspect
> there are much bigger ones out there.

Hi Nick,

118 source code blocks and growing.

Tom

>
> Nick
>
>

-- 
Thomas S. Dye
http://www.tsdye.com