Re: I'm tripping over #+BABEL: vs. #+PROPERTY:

[Rainer M Krug <r.m.krug@gmail.com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 15/03/12 17:14, Nick Dokos wrote:
> Sebastien Vauban <wxhgmqzgwmuf@spammotel.com> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Nick and Eric,
>> 
>> Nick Dokos wrote:
>>> Eric Schulte <eric.schulte@gmx.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Did you press C-c C-c on each property line after it was written?
>>> 
>>> Just to clarify: do I really have to C-c C-c on each line? If I add a bunch of them and
>>> then do C-c C-c on one of them, shouldn't that be enough to refresh the setup?
>> 
>> I got no reaction on my idea of "automagic C-c C-c" (on 2012-03-04 Sun, see 
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/emacs-orgmode@gnu.org/msg52739.html):
>> 
>> The "automagic C-c C-c" should be NOT[1] done after each key press or some such. That
>> certainly would be a killer feature, in its real acception: performance would be unbearable.
>> 
>> In my mind, automatically (re-)parsing the meta options should be each time the user presses
>> `C-c C-v C-e' (eval code blocks); that is, when the user expects his options to be taken into
>> account.
>> 
>> Does it make sense?
>> 
>> Best regards, Seb
>> 
>> Footnotes:
>> 
>> [1] This word was missing (in the original post)!
>> 
> 
> Well, it might make sense but you can try it out and let us know:
> 
> - make files with 10, 100, 1000 trivial (or even empty) code blocks, just enough to make sure
> that org-babel-execute-maybe is really called on them: I think that it will be called even on
> empty code blocks, but I'm not sure if there is some optimization in there.
> 
> - measure the time it takes to export each one to html (say).
> 
> - add a call to org-mode-restart into org-babel-execute-maybe, and time the same operation
> again: how significant is the slowdown?
> 
> If the slowdown is bearable in these cases, then it will be bearable in realistic situations,
> where block execution is going to be a much more significant fraction of the total.
> 
> BTW, what's the biggest file you (all, not just Seb) have in terms of the number of code blocks
> it contains? In my case, the largest one had about two dozen code blocks, so the 100 case would
> easily cover me, but I suspect there are much bigger ones out there.

142 - used in literal programming.

Rainer

> 
> Nick
> 


- -- 
Rainer M. Krug, PhD (Conservation Ecology, SUN), MSc (Conservation Biology, UCT), Dipl. Phys.
(Germany)

Centre of Excellence for Invasion Biology
Stellenbosch University
South Africa

Tel :       +33 - (0)9 53 10 27 44
Cell:       +33 - (0)6 85 62 59 98
Fax :       +33 - (0)9 58 10 27 44

Fax (D):    +49 - (0)3 21 21 25 22 44

email:      Rainer@krugs.de

Skype:      RMkrug
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk9m7JsACgkQoYgNqgF2egoV4ACeISeB8GZWSCDSkIPgqIHViqeh
fokAn3cgygfMKr2VInkLkHHX3gIPe58G
=S2uU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----