Re: [wip-cite-new] Initial implementation of `csl' citation processor

["Bruce D'Arcus" <bdarcus@gmail.com>]

On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 4:01 AM Denis Maier <denismaier@mailbox.org> wrote:
>
> Am 27.05.2021 um 03:58 schrieb Bruce D'Arcus:
> > On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 8:47 PM Bruce D'Arcus <bdarcus@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> BTW, I did get it all setup, and do seem to have run into a bug.
> >>
> >> Input:
> >>
> >> [cite/noauthor:@latexcompanion p23]
> >>
> >> Output (not position of the locator label):
> >>
> >> (p 1993, 23)
> >
> > Hmm ... experimenting some more, these work correctly.
> >
> > [cite/noauthor:@latexcompanion page 23]
> > [cite/noauthor:@latexcompanion p. 23]
> > [cite/noauthor:@latexcompanion p.23]
> >
> > Still not sure why the above with the p at the front though.
>
> I think a plain "p" in front of a number is not recognized as a locator
> prefix.
> Nicolas's post mentions "page", "p.", "pp." as valid locator terms for
> page. So in your case this here seems to apply: "The part of the suffix
> before the locator is appended to reference's prefix."

I missed the significance of that last part.

What's the use case there Nicolas?

Aside from that, a bit more testing this morning, with plain, latex
and html is looking good. I got exected output using default and the
chicago-note-bibliography-16th-edition.csl style.

Bruce