emacs-orgmode@gnu.org archives
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: "András Simonyi" <andras.simonyi@gmail.com>
To: "Bruce D'Arcus" <bdarcus@gmail.com>,
	"András Simonyi" <andras.simonyi@gmail.com>,
	org-mode-email <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [wip-cite-new] Initial implementation of `csl' citation processor
Date: Mon, 31 May 2021 19:46:58 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOWRwxCeArbX+fNhO8a99q=24QxKdixT7JGQ6NOUzSGGmd9Bvg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87sg25zf0z.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>

Dear All,

On Sat, 29 May 2021 at 18:22, Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> wrote:

> Here's another proposal:
>
> `org-cite-export-processor' is now an alist, where keys are export
> back-ends or t, which is the default key.
>
>   '((latex biblatex bibstyle citestyle)
>     (beamer natbib nil nil)
>     (my-latex natbib bibstyle)
>     (t csl nil nil))
> The selected processor is the one associated to the back-ends closest to
> the current one used for export, by `org-export-derived-backend-p'
> order. So if `my-other-latex' is derived from beamer, it will use
> (natbib nil nil).

This looks perfect.

> OTOH, I suggest to stick to a single "cite_export" keyword, which
> overrides any selected processor above. IOW
>
>    #+cite_export: basic
>
> will use basic whatever the current export back-end is.
>
> In practice, I think it is sufficient. The only case where it may be
> limiting is if you need to export with two different back-ends with two
> processors different from those set in `org-cite-export-processor'. But
> in that situation, I think swapping the cite_export keyword is
> acceptable.
>
> So overall, I think it is a good compromise between simplicity and
> power.

> WDYT?

I agree, can be revisited later if necessary, but seems to be  a very
strong starting point -- thanks.

best regards,
András


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-05-31 17:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-26 20:33 Nicolas Goaziou
2021-05-26 21:11 ` Bruce D'Arcus
2021-05-26 22:07   ` Nicolas Goaziou
2021-05-27  0:47     ` Bruce D'Arcus
2021-05-27  1:58       ` Bruce D'Arcus
2021-05-27  8:01         ` Denis Maier
2021-05-27 12:45           ` Bruce D'Arcus
2021-05-27 13:12             ` Nicolas Goaziou
2021-05-27 14:18               ` Bruce D'Arcus
2021-05-27 14:34                 ` Bruce D'Arcus
2021-05-27 15:02                   ` Bruce D'Arcus
2021-05-27 16:13                     ` Bruce D'Arcus
2021-05-27 17:49                       ` Matt Price
2021-05-28 13:05                       ` Bruce D'Arcus
2021-05-28 13:52                         ` Nicolas Goaziou
2021-05-28 21:37                           ` Bruce D'Arcus
2021-05-29 16:34                     ` Nicolas Goaziou
2021-05-29 17:25                       ` Bruce D'Arcus
2021-05-29 17:56                         ` Bruce D'Arcus
2021-05-29 20:07                         ` Nicolas Goaziou
2021-05-27 12:59           ` Nicolas Goaziou
2021-05-27  9:15 ` Denis Maier
2021-05-27 12:24   ` Nicolas Goaziou
2021-05-27 12:59 ` Bruce D'Arcus
2021-05-28 15:54   ` Nicolas Goaziou
2021-05-28 16:13     ` Bruce D'Arcus
2021-05-28 16:14     ` Timothy
2021-05-28 17:11       ` Nicolas Goaziou
2021-05-28 17:32         ` Timothy
2021-05-28 17:38           ` Nicolas Goaziou
2021-05-28 17:54             ` Timothy
2021-05-28 18:26               ` Bruce D'Arcus
2021-05-28 19:40                 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2021-05-28 20:31                   ` András Simonyi
2021-05-29 13:52                     ` Bruce D'Arcus
2021-05-29 16:22                       ` Nicolas Goaziou
2021-05-30 13:17                         ` Bruce D'Arcus
2021-05-30 20:20                           ` Nicolas Goaziou
2021-05-31 23:44                             ` Bruce D'Arcus
2021-05-31 17:46                         ` András Simonyi [this message]
2021-06-05 17:16                         ` Nicolas Goaziou
2021-05-29  7:51                   ` Stefan Nobis
2021-05-29 14:08                     ` Bruce D'Arcus

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.orgmode.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAOWRwxCeArbX+fNhO8a99q=24QxKdixT7JGQ6NOUzSGGmd9Bvg@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=andras.simonyi@gmail.com \
    --cc=bdarcus@gmail.com \
    --cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
    --subject='Re: [wip-cite-new] Initial implementation of `csl'\'' citation processor' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Code repositories for project(s) associated with this inbox:

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).