Re: Emacs-orgmode Digest, Vol 26, Issue 34

[Carsten Dominik <dominik@science.uva.nl>]

Hi Ben,

thanks for this.

- Carsten

On Apr 13, 2008, at 7:04 PM, bva@alexanderonline.org wrote:

> Hi Carsten,
>
> I thought I'd jump in with my 2 pennies:
>
> http:foo.html is a bad habit because (just perhaps) the HTML file  
> isn't accessed by http, and then the internal links break.  So if  
> the generated HTML documents are stored locally (I fantasize that  
> someday my PSP will be able to do this) and accessed using a file://  
> link, the HTML spec requires the browser to ditch the protocol and  
> use the specified one, which won't work if my PSP is offline.
>
> -Ben
>
> On 2008-04-13 Sun, at 17:54:33 +0200, Carsten Dominik <dominik@science.uva.nl 
> > wrote:
>>
>> Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 17:54:33 +0200
>> From: Carsten Dominik <dominik@science.uva.nl>
>> Subject: Re: [Orgmode] export to html and relative links:
>> To: raman@users.sf.net
>> Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
>> Message-ID: <D929E8AD-0CAF-4263-81E5-13D28C023EE2@science.uva.nl>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
>>
>>
>> On Apr 13, 2008, at 5:33 PM, T. V. Raman wrote:
>>
>>> I've not tried http:foo.html -- but I suggest doing that to
>>> author a relative URL is a bad idea.
>>
>> Can you explain why you think that this is a bad idea?
>> Educate me!  What is wrong with writing http:foo.html ??????
>>
>> - Carsten
>>
>