[bug] Error evaluating table expression with relative references

[bug] Error evaluating table expression with relative references

[Eric S Fraga]

Hello,

I seem to have encountered a bug in table spreadsheet evaluations.  See
this example:

#+begin_src org
  ,* Table evaluation with relative references
  | 1 | 2 | 3 |      6 |
  | 1 | 2 | 3 | #ERROR |
  ,#+TBLFM: @1$4=vsum($1..$3)::@2$4=vsum($1..$-1)
#+end_src

As far as I can tell, the two formulae should be equivalent?  Or am I
missing something silly (not unlikely ;-)?

Turning on debugging shows that the first formula gets converted to
vsum([1,2,3]) whereas the second goes to vsum((1)..(3)).

This is with git updated a minute ago and with emacs -Q.

Thanks,
eric

-- 
: Eric S Fraga (0xFFFCF67D), Emacs 24.4.1, Org release_8.3beta-1154-g6ba251

Re: [bug] Error evaluating table expression with relative references

[Nicolas Goaziou]

Hello,

Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk> writes:

> I seem to have encountered a bug in table spreadsheet evaluations.  See
> this example:
>
> #+begin_src org
>   ,* Table evaluation with relative references
>   | 1 | 2 | 3 |      6 |
>   | 1 | 2 | 3 | #ERROR |
>   ,#+TBLFM: @1$4=vsum($1..$3)::@2$4=vsum($1..$-1)
> #+end_src
>
> As far as I can tell, the two formulae should be equivalent?  Or am I
> missing something silly (not unlikely ;-)?
>
> Turning on debugging shows that the first formula gets converted to
> vsum([1,2,3]) whereas the second goes to vsum((1)..(3)).

Fixed in 3924989b4f45a5c7ff89a4f7abdebc570cbaf7e2. Thank you.


Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou

Re: [bug] Error evaluating table expression with relative references

[e.fraga]

On Tuesday,  9 Jun 2015 at 15:04, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk> writes:
>
>> I seem to have encountered a bug in table spreadsheet
>> evaluations.  See
>> this example:
>>
>> #+begin_src org
>>   ,* Table evaluation with relative references
>>   | 1 | 2 | 3 |      6 |
>>   | 1 | 2 | 3 | #ERROR |
>>   ,#+TBLFM: @1$4=vsum($1..$3)::@2$4=vsum($1..$-1)
>> #+end_src
>>
>> As far as I can tell, the two formulae should be equivalent?  Or am
>> I
>> missing something silly (not unlikely ;-)?
>>
>> Turning on debugging shows that the first formula gets converted to
>> vsum([1,2,3]) whereas the second goes to vsum((1)..(3)).
>
> Fixed in 3924989b4f45a5c7ff89a4f7abdebc570cbaf7e2. Thank you.

Confirmed!  Many thanks.
-- 
: Eric S Fraga (0xFFFCF67D), Emacs 24.4.1, Org release_8.3beta-802-g7e4228.dirty