From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: [bug] Error evaluating table expression with relative references
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 15:37:27 +0100
Message-ID: <87r3pifh08.fsf@ucl.ac.uk>
References: <87k2w3l44t.fsf@pinto.chemeng.ucl.ac.uk>
	<87vbexuj66.fsf@selenimh.access.network>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60129)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk>) id 1Z33ft-0000qP-NG
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 10:41:46 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk>) id 1Z33fq-0006xG-HS
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 10:41:45 -0400
Received: from mail-am1on0108.outbound.protection.outlook.com
	([157.56.112.108]:48780
	helo=emea01-am1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk>) id 1Z33fq-0006wz-98
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 10:41:42 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87vbexuj66.fsf@selenimh.access.network> (Nicolas Goaziou's
	message of "Tue, 9 Jun 2015 15:04:49 +0200")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

On Tuesday,  9 Jun 2015 at 15:04, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk> writes:
>
>> I seem to have encountered a bug in table spreadsheet
>> evaluations.  See
>> this example:
>>
>> #+begin_src org
>>   ,* Table evaluation with relative references
>>   | 1 | 2 | 3 |      6 |
>>   | 1 | 2 | 3 | #ERROR |
>>   ,#+TBLFM: @1$4=vsum($1..$3)::@2$4=vsum($1..$-1)
>> #+end_src
>>
>> As far as I can tell, the two formulae should be equivalent?  Or am
>> I
>> missing something silly (not unlikely ;-)?
>>
>> Turning on debugging shows that the first formula gets converted to
>> vsum([1,2,3]) whereas the second goes to vsum((1)..(3)).
>
> Fixed in 3924989b4f45a5c7ff89a4f7abdebc570cbaf7e2. Thank you.

Confirmed!  Many thanks.
-- 
: Eric S Fraga (0xFFFCF67D), Emacs 24.4.1, Org release_8.3beta-802-g7e4228.dirty