From: Achim Gratz <Stromeko@nexgo.de>
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Subject: Re: org-plus-contrib: Invalid function: org-no-popups
Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2013 13:48:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87sj5o155t.fsf@Rainer.invalid> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 871ud88bp7.fsf@bzg.ath.cx
Bastien writes:
> I don't like it for at least these reasons:
>
> - it introduces an advice in the code -- we should work toward
> removing them, not adding them.
That's the mechanism Emacs provides for dealing with those situations.
I could do it without an advice, but it would still do the same things,
namely unload all features that have been shadowed by changing load-path
so that they can be re-loaded from the correct place. It may have
escaped your attention, but the advice is de-activated at the earliest
possible moment and will not affect any later uses of require.
> - it advices `require', which is a very core function in Emacs.
Which has been discussed on Emacs devel and has been pronounced safe in
this case.
> This is completely hackish.
Like a few hundred other places in Emacs and Org. Also, when some day
Emacs will perhaps solve the problem, the solution will likely be
something very similar: renaming the require primitive and creating a
wrapper in Lisp that does what the advice is doing.
> This is like telling Windows users to reboot their system so that it
> can works correctly (remember the old days?). It feels wrong. And I
> doubt we can educate the users -- there are many of them, and many
> don't have the time to tell they have a problem.
So why are you trying to educate users not to use ELPA when you think
it's a waste of time?
> I'm not sure what solution you suggest here.
A problem produced by a certain piece of software should be fixed by
that same software. For example, if starter-kit insists on loading Org
before things are ready, it should also unload Org after it is finished
using it and before the actual initialization commences.
> In general, I think the benefit of having several ELPA distributions
> of Org is not worth the trouble of dealing with installation issues.
You're confusing me. Do you want to remove Org from ELPA or not?
Regards,
Achim.
--
+<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+
Factory and User Sound Singles for Waldorf Q+, Q and microQ:
http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#WaldorfSounds
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-26 12:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-23 17:42 org-plus-contrib: Invalid function: org-no-popups Moritz Ulrich
2013-01-24 14:08 ` Bastien
2013-01-24 20:42 ` Achim Gratz
2013-01-24 21:59 ` Bastien
2013-01-25 6:48 ` Achim Gratz
2013-01-25 8:51 ` Bastien
2013-01-25 10:33 ` Bastien
2013-01-25 19:59 ` Achim Gratz
2013-01-26 10:45 ` Bastien
2013-01-26 12:48 ` Achim Gratz [this message]
2013-01-26 13:11 ` Bastien
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.orgmode.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87sj5o155t.fsf@Rainer.invalid \
--to=stromeko@nexgo.de \
--cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).