Re: Remove old WORG page with Org Syntax (draft) in favour of new syntax page by Timothy

[Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>]

Hello,

Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@gmail.com> writes:

> We currently have two versions of Org syntax in WORG:
> 1. https://orgmode.org/worg/dev/org-syntax.html (old, not always accurate)
> 2. https://orgmode.org/worg/dev/org-syntax-edited.html (new, being
>    discussed in https://orgmode.org/list/871r1g936z.fsf@gmail.com)
>
> The old syntax page is apparently ranked higher by search engines,
> creating confusion among users (see the above discussion and the below
> message sent off-list).
>
> Maybe we can move org-syntax-edited in place of org-syntax at this
> point? I personally think that Tecosaur's version is strictly superior
> to the old draft, even though is can still be further improved.
>
> WDYT?

I have no objection. However, I suggest to remove references to DATA,
HEADERS, LABEL, RESNAME, RESULT, SOURCE, SRCNAME and TBLNAME in
org-element-affiliated keywords, which are here for
backward-compatibility reason, but shouldn't appear nowadays (and are
not even mentioned in the manual).

For the same reason, I suggest removing file+sys and file+emacs, which
were (and are AFAIK) planned for removal.

Regards,
-- 
Nicolas Goaziou