From: Matt Lundin <mdl@imapmail.org>
To: Christopher Allan Webber <cwebber@dustycloud.org>
Cc: theo <theocrite@theocrite.org>, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Occurance property, or some similar name?
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 15:28:22 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87k4ezxoa1.fsf@fastmail.fm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87wrizpm4y.fsf@dustycloud.org> (Christopher Allan Webber's message of "Tue, 12 Apr 2011 09:41:49 -0500")
Christopher Allan Webber <cwebber@dustycloud.org> writes:
> theo <theocrite@theocrite.org> writes:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> On 12/04/2011 00:42, Christopher Allan Webber wrote:
>>> I was once one of the many people who apparently originally
>>> misunderstood what "SCHEDULED" meant, and used to set it to like, an
>>> appointment time.
>>
>> That's what I do.
>>
>> Maybe I lack background, but why do you think it's not appropriate for
>> this use?
>
> So when it comes to TODO like things, SCHEDULED is when you should start
> working on it, DEADLINE is when it's due.
>
> One side effect of doing it "wrong" is that non-TODO items that are
> SCHEDULED stay on your agenda forever (or until archived, and still
> forever with archive view on), which is nasty.
There is a nice FAQ on this:
http://orgmode.org/worg/org-faq.html#scheduled-vs-deadline-vs-timestamp
Best,
Matt
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-12 19:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-11 22:42 Occurance property, or some similar name? Christopher Allan Webber
2011-04-12 4:22 ` theo
2011-04-12 14:41 ` Christopher Allan Webber
2011-04-12 19:28 ` Matt Lundin [this message]
2011-04-12 19:25 ` Matt Lundin
2011-04-12 20:52 ` Christopher Allan Webber
2011-04-13 1:01 ` Matt Lundin
2011-04-13 13:07 ` Christopher Allan Webber
2011-04-13 8:19 ` Michael Brand
2011-04-13 13:08 ` Christopher Allan Webber
2011-04-13 14:19 ` Michael Brand
2011-04-13 14:43 ` Christopher Allan Webber
2011-04-13 15:42 ` Michael Brand
2011-04-13 15:57 ` Christopher Allan Webber
2011-04-12 20:00 ` Memnon Anon
2011-04-12 20:24 ` Richard Riley
2011-04-13 15:34 ` Carsten Dominik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.orgmode.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87k4ezxoa1.fsf@fastmail.fm \
--to=mdl@imapmail.org \
--cc=cwebber@dustycloud.org \
--cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
--cc=theocrite@theocrite.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).