From: Bastien <bzg@altern.org>
To: Carsten Dominik <dominik@science.uva.nl>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Re: Active timestamp with notification in advance
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 10:19:57 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87abllcrhu.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DC312FE4-E66E-485B-909D-50B719DDC28B@science.uva.nl> (Carsten Dominik's message of "Thu, 28 Feb 2008 08:09:29 +0100")
Carsten Dominik <dominik@science.uva.nl> writes:
> On Feb 28, 2008, at 3:05 AM, Wanrong Lin wrote:
>>
>> For SCHEDULED and plain active time stamp, I don't think we need to
>> have a default ahead notification setting as with deadlines, but it
>> would really be nice to support the <..... -3d> format. It would be
>> even nicer to have a new keyword (like "SCHEDULED@") that indicates
>> a strictly scheduled item (just a fancy term for "appointment") and
>> hence a default ahead notification setting can be applied. The lack
>> of real appointment support in org-mode in fact is a little bit
>> puzzling to me, since SCHEDULED item may or may not be strictly
>> scheduled, while plain time stamp item may or may not be something
>> that needs to take actions on (as it could be just an event).
>
> Hmmm, lets discuss this for a while.
It looks like there are two questions here: whether we should have a
dedicated syntax for appointments, distinct from active timestamps, and
whether we should allow warnings on other timestamps than deadline ones.
(Maybe a good thing to keep these issue separate as long as possible.)
I don't feel the need of a new APPOINTMENT keyword, or a SCHEDULED@ one,
because I'm using timestamps like this:
- active timestamps for appointments;
- SCHEDULED timestamps for items that (1) need to remain in the agenda
when they are not DONE, and (2) I don't need to be warned about;
- DEADLINE for everything else that I need to attach a date with.
I guess this setup is somewhat counter-intuitive for newcomers, since
the semantic of SCHEDULED makes you believe this is what you need for
most tasks. But I think this semantic is somewhat misleading.
With the setup above, I tend to use more and more active timestamps and
deadlines. The need for a scheduled item is very rare, since the two
specific features of SCHEDULED is that I won't be warned about such
tasks and I will be able to find them with `org-check-before-date'...
So, rather than introducing a new keyword, I'd better get rid of them
and redefine timestamps like this:
[2008-02-28 jeu] Inactive timestamp
<2008-02-28 jeu> Active timestamp
{2008-02-28 jeu} Interactive timestamp
By "interactive", I mean that those timestamps would be aware of
`org-deadline-warning-days' and other variables like this one, or be
able to stay in the agenda if the associated task is not DONE, etc.
For exemple:
{2008-02-28 jeu -10d}
=> Warn 10 days before
{2008-02-28 jeu -10d--+2d}
=> Warn 10 days before and 2 days after, if not DONE
Active timestamp would also use this syntax, but for the purpose of
defining *time spans*, not pre- and post-reminders.
For example:
<2008-02-18 jeu +3d>
=> Define an appointment for a meeting between
2008-02-28 and 2008-02-21.
I'm aware that this change would require a careful redefinition of the
use of "scheduled" and "deadline" in variable names and in the manual,
but I think that it would finally help simplifying things a bit.
In a sense, relying spontaneous understanding that people have of the
words "SCHEDULED" and "DEADLINE" can be a bit dangerous -- or simply
assumes too much about the normal use of those kinds of timestamps.
--
Bastien
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-28 10:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-26 22:01 Active timestamp with notification in advance Wanrong Lin
2008-02-27 14:46 ` Carsten Dominik
2008-02-27 15:33 ` Wanrong Lin
2008-02-27 16:03 ` Bernt Hansen
2008-02-28 1:29 ` Bastien
2008-02-28 1:41 ` Bernt Hansen
2008-02-28 2:05 ` Wanrong Lin
2008-02-28 2:20 ` Wanrong Lin
2008-02-28 7:09 ` Carsten Dominik
2008-02-28 10:19 ` Bastien [this message]
2008-02-28 15:29 ` Carsten Dominik
2008-02-28 15:55 ` Wanrong Lin
2008-02-28 16:34 ` Egli Christian (KIRO 433)
2008-02-28 16:49 ` Wanrong Lin
2008-02-28 18:14 ` Bernt Hansen
2008-02-28 18:29 ` Wanrong Lin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.orgmode.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87abllcrhu.fsf@bzg.ath.cx \
--to=bzg@altern.org \
--cc=dominik@science.uva.nl \
--cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).