Setting Tags Using #+INCLUDE:

Setting Tags Using #+INCLUDE:

[Ian Barton]

I have tags defined in my .emacs using setq org-tag-alist. However, I 
have a group of files (>100) for which I want to define a different set 
of tags. Rather than place a #+TAGS directive I thought I would define 
them in another file (setup.org) and INCLUDE this in each of the 100 files.

However, this doesn't seem to work. Pressing C-q on the first headline 
of fpr.org only offers me the inherited tags defined in org-tag-alist. 
Is this expected behaviour or a bug?

setup.org
#+TITLE: Common Setup Parameters for All Blog Files.
#+TAGS: blog(b) gear(g) mountaineering(m) emacs(e) linux(l) mythtv(m) 
backpacking(k) review(r)
#+STARTUP: logdone noptag


fpr.org:

#+STARTUP: showall indent
#+STARTUP: hidestars
#+TITLE: First Pinnacle Rib.
#+INCLUDE: "setup.org"

* First Pinnacle Rib - Tryfan

Re: Setting Tags Using #+INCLUDE:

[Carsten Dominik]

Hi Ian,

you need to use #+setupfile instead of #+include for this purpose.

- Carsten

On 22 okt. 2012, at 14:39, Ian Barton <lists@wilkesley.net> wrote:

> I have tags defined in my .emacs using setq org-tag-alist. However, I have a group of files (>100) for which I want to define a different set of tags. Rather than place a #+TAGS directive I thought I would define them in another file (setup.org) and INCLUDE this in each of the 100 files.
> 
> However, this doesn't seem to work. Pressing C-q on the first headline of fpr.org only offers me the inherited tags defined in org-tag-alist. Is this expected behaviour or a bug?
> 
> setup.org
> #+TITLE: Common Setup Parameters for All Blog Files.
> #+TAGS: blog(b) gear(g) mountaineering(m) emacs(e) linux(l) mythtv(m) backpacking(k) review(r)
> #+STARTUP: logdone noptag
> 
> 
> fpr.org:
> 
> #+STARTUP: showall indent
> #+STARTUP: hidestars
> #+TITLE: First Pinnacle Rib.
> #+INCLUDE: "setup.org"
> 
> * First Pinnacle Rib - Tryfan
> 

- Carsten

Re: Setting Tags Using #+INCLUDE:

[Ian Barton]

Thanks Carsten,

Works perfectly.

Ian.

On 22/10/12 13:59, Carsten Dominik wrote:
> Hi Ian,
>
> you need to use #+setupfile instead of #+include for this purpose.
>
> - Carsten
>
> On 22 okt. 2012, at 14:39, Ian Barton <lists@wilkesley.net> wrote:
>
>> I have tags defined in my .emacs using setq org-tag-alist. However, I have a group of files (>100) for which I want to define a different set of tags. Rather than place a #+TAGS directive I thought I would define them in another file (setup.org) and INCLUDE this in each of the 100 files.
>>
>> However, this doesn't seem to work. Pressing C-q on the first headline of fpr.org only offers me the inherited tags defined in org-tag-alist. Is this expected behaviour or a bug?
>>
>> setup.org
>> #+TITLE: Common Setup Parameters for All Blog Files.
>> #+TAGS: blog(b) gear(g) mountaineering(m) emacs(e) linux(l) mythtv(m) backpacking(k) review(r)
>> #+STARTUP: logdone noptag
>>
>>
>> fpr.org:
>>
>> #+STARTUP: showall indent
>> #+STARTUP: hidestars
>> #+TITLE: First Pinnacle Rib.
>> #+INCLUDE: "setup.org"
>>
>> * First Pinnacle Rib - Tryfan
>>
>
> - Carsten
>
>
>
>

Re: Setting Tags Using #+INCLUDE:

[François Pinard]

Ian Barton <lists@wilkesley.net> writes:

> Thanks Carsten,
> Works perfectly.

> On 22/10/12 13:59, Carsten Dominik wrote:
>> you need to use #+setupfile instead of #+include for this purpose.

>> On 22 okt. 2012, at 14:39, Ian Barton <lists@wilkesley.net> wrote:
>>> I thought I would define them in another file (setup.org) and
>>> INCLUDE this in each of the 100 files.

Didn't we recently read on this list that there are plans to have
#+INCLUDE subsume the functionality of #+SETUPFILE, so the later may
disappear?

I noticed because I would prefer having only #+INCLUDE in my files,
rather than having both #+SETUPFILE and #+INCLUDE.

François

Re: Setting Tags Using #+INCLUDE:

[Sebastien Vauban]

Hi François,

François Pinard wrote:
> Ian Barton <lists-7pvjUo7bQWlIf6P1QZMOBw@public.gmane.org> writes:
>> On 22/10/12 13:59, Carsten Dominik wrote:
>>> On 22 okt. 2012, at 14:39, Ian Barton <lists-7pvjUo7bQWlIf6P1QZMOBw@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>>>> I thought I would define them in another file (setup.org) and INCLUDE
>>>> this in each of the 100 files.
>>>
>>> you need to use #+setupfile instead of #+include for this purpose.
>
> Didn't we recently read on this list that there are plans to have #+INCLUDE
> subsume the functionality of #+SETUPFILE, so the later may disappear?

Yes, we did (last week or so).

> I noticed because I would prefer having only #+INCLUDE in my files, rather
> than having both #+SETUPFILE and #+INCLUDE.

I already tried it with current files (*and* current HTML exporter), but that
does not work. So, I guess we'll have to wait for the new exporter to be in
Org for that to be completely effective.

But, for sure, that will work -- and SETUPFILE will be dropped.

Best regards,
  Seb

-- 
Sebastien Vauban