From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Sebastien Vauban" Subject: Re: Setting Tags Using #+INCLUDE: Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 23:19:28 +0200 Message-ID: <80liey19y7.fsf@somewhere.org> References: <50853E9D.9090905@wilkesley.net> <916ED54D-05D0-4952-86F8-64417D836F62@gmail.com> <50854440.1010802@wilkesley.net> <864nlmgsfz.fsf@mercure.progiciels-bpi.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org To: emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org Hi Fran=C3=A7ois, Fran=C3=A7ois Pinard wrote: > Ian Barton writes: >> On 22/10/12 13:59, Carsten Dominik wrote: >>> On 22 okt. 2012, at 14:39, Ian Barton wrote: >>>> I thought I would define them in another file (setup.org) and INCLUDE >>>> this in each of the 100 files. >>> >>> you need to use #+setupfile instead of #+include for this purpose. > > Didn't we recently read on this list that there are plans to have #+INCLU= DE > subsume the functionality of #+SETUPFILE, so the later may disappear? Yes, we did (last week or so). > I noticed because I would prefer having only #+INCLUDE in my files, rather > than having both #+SETUPFILE and #+INCLUDE. I already tried it with current files (*and* current HTML exporter), but th= at does not work. So, I guess we'll have to wait for the new exporter to be in Org for that to be completely effective. But, for sure, that will work -- and SETUPFILE will be dropped. Best regards, Seb --=20 Sebastien Vauban