emacs-orgmode@gnu.org archives
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Torsten Wagner <torsten.wagner@gmail.com>
To: Org Mode List <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
Subject: [org-babel] Does org-babel needs some simplification?
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 12:51:54 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C296DDA.1080109@gmail.com> (raw)

Dear All,

as a (quite, but happy) org-bable user of the first hour I followed up
the development process actively.
Nevertheless, some weeks or months pass where I had no need for
org-babel (yes, really strange I know).

Whenever I come back to org-babel, it takes me a huge amount of time to
find myself back again in the syntax. Often I spend a day or two heavily
reading the website and manual again to figure out how to make it working.

There are so many options. tangle files, results, scripting mode,
sessions, noweb, lot, etc.

Just yesterday, I fighted again to make a simple python script running
as desired to generate an automatic report. I did this dozen of times
and even by using some old report as template I still struggle with it.
Comparing old reports I noticed that I did it in many different ways.
Tangeling all snipplets, using noweb syntax, with and without session
support, etc.

Don't get me wrong, I really love org-babel and I think it is really
great. I just wonder wether it has become too complex and too difficult
to use to attract most of the org-mode people. Esp. considering people
who use it not on a regular basis.

Best regards

Torsten

             reply	other threads:[~2010-06-29  3:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-06-29  3:51 Torsten Wagner [this message]
2010-06-29  4:28 ` [org-babel] Does org-babel needs some simplification? Erik Iverson
2010-06-29 18:07   ` Eric Schulte
2010-06-29  4:36 ` Carsten Dominik
2010-06-29  7:29 ` Thomas S. Dye
2010-06-29 18:01 ` Eric Schulte
2010-06-30 19:30 ` Daniel Brunner
2010-06-30 21:56   ` Jonathan Arkell
2010-07-01  0:37   ` Bernt Hansen
2010-07-01  2:36 ` Torsten Wagner
2010-07-01 20:53   ` Eric Schulte

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.orgmode.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4C296DDA.1080109@gmail.com \
    --to=torsten.wagner@gmail.com \
    --cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).