* Question: C-c C-w
@ 2007-11-07 16:39 Carsten Dominik
2007-11-07 18:46 ` William Henney
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Carsten Dominik @ 2007-11-07 16:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: org-mode mailing list
Hi,
is anyone using the command `C-c C-w' a lot?
I am planning to use these keys for a different purpose,
and to make `org-check-deadline' accessible only
through the sparse tree command `C-c /'
- Carsten
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: Question: C-c C-w
2007-11-07 16:39 Question: C-c C-w Carsten Dominik
@ 2007-11-07 18:46 ` William Henney
2007-11-07 22:48 ` Daniel J. Sinder
2007-11-07 23:17 ` Bastien
2 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: William Henney @ 2007-11-07 18:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Carsten Dominik; +Cc: org-mode mailing list
On 11/7/07, Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com> wrote:
> is anyone using the command `C-c C-w' a lot?
> I am planning to use these keys for a different purpose,
> and to make `org-check-deadline' accessible only
> through the sparse tree command `C-c /'
Personally, I have only ever used it by mistake when I meant to use
`C-c C-x C-w'
Will
--
Dr William Henney, Centro de Radioastronomía y Astrofísica,
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Campus Morelia
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Question: C-c C-w
2007-11-07 16:39 Question: C-c C-w Carsten Dominik
2007-11-07 18:46 ` William Henney
@ 2007-11-07 22:48 ` Daniel J. Sinder
2007-11-07 23:17 ` Bastien
2 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Daniel J. Sinder @ 2007-11-07 22:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Carsten Dominik; +Cc: org-mode mailing list
On 11/07/2007 08:39 AM, Carsten Dominik wrote:
> is anyone using the command `C-c C-w' a lot?
> I am planning to use these keys for a different purpose,
> and to make `org-check-deadline' accessible only
> through the sparse tree command `C-c /'
Never used it, but maybe I should have ;)
...
* TODO Figure out what C-c C-w does
DEADLINE: <2007-04-01 Sun>
...
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Question: C-c C-w
2007-11-07 16:39 Question: C-c C-w Carsten Dominik
2007-11-07 18:46 ` William Henney
2007-11-07 22:48 ` Daniel J. Sinder
@ 2007-11-07 23:17 ` Bastien
2007-11-08 9:31 ` Carsten Dominik
2 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Bastien @ 2007-11-07 23:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: emacs-orgmode
Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com> writes:
> is anyone using the command `C-c C-w' a lot?
FWIW, I'm not using it at all, but I always thought I *should* :)
--
Bastien
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Question: C-c C-w
2007-11-07 23:17 ` Bastien
@ 2007-11-08 9:31 ` Carsten Dominik
2007-11-08 12:57 ` Bernt Hansen
2007-11-09 7:00 ` Giovanni Ridolfi
0 siblings, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Carsten Dominik @ 2007-11-08 9:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bastien; +Cc: emacs-orgmode
On 8Nov2007, at 12:17 AM, Bastien wrote:
> Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> is anyone using the command `C-c C-w' a lot?
>
> FWIW, I'm not using it at all, but I always thought I *should* :)
No, I don't think so, the agenda is better for looking at deadlines.
This is pretty much obsolete, IMHO.
- Carsten
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Question: C-c C-w
2007-11-08 9:31 ` Carsten Dominik
@ 2007-11-08 12:57 ` Bernt Hansen
2007-11-08 14:02 ` Rick Moynihan
2007-11-09 7:00 ` Giovanni Ridolfi
1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Bernt Hansen @ 2007-11-08 12:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Carsten Dominik; +Cc: emacs-orgmode
Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com> writes:
> On 8Nov2007, at 12:17 AM, Bastien wrote:
>
>> Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> is anyone using the command `C-c C-w' a lot?
>>
>> FWIW, I'm not using it at all, but I always thought I *should* :)
>
> No, I don't think so, the agenda is better for looking at deadlines.
> This is pretty much obsolete, IMHO.
I tried it ages ago just to see what it does but never use it now. The
agenda works great for viewing deadlines. Anything that doesn't show up
on the agenda just isn't important enough to look at yet from a deadline
perspective.
Bernt
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Re: Question: C-c C-w
2007-11-08 12:57 ` Bernt Hansen
@ 2007-11-08 14:02 ` Rick Moynihan
2007-11-08 14:55 ` Rainer Stengele
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Rick Moynihan @ 2007-11-08 14:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bernt Hansen; +Cc: emacs-orgmode, Carsten Dominik
Bernt Hansen wrote:
> Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> On 8Nov2007, at 12:17 AM, Bastien wrote:
>>
>>> Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> is anyone using the command `C-c C-w' a lot?
>>> FWIW, I'm not using it at all, but I always thought I *should* :)
>> No, I don't think so, the agenda is better for looking at deadlines.
>> This is pretty much obsolete, IMHO.
>
> I tried it ages ago just to see what it does but never use it now. The
> agenda works great for viewing deadlines. Anything that doesn't show up
> on the agenda just isn't important enough to look at yet from a deadline
> perspective.
>
Same. I say free the key-binding for something better :)
R.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Question: C-c C-w
2007-11-08 14:02 ` Rick Moynihan
@ 2007-11-08 14:55 ` Rainer Stengele
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Rainer Stengele @ 2007-11-08 14:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: emacs-orgmode
Rick Moynihan schrieb:
> Bernt Hansen wrote:
>> Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> On 8Nov2007, at 12:17 AM, Bastien wrote:
>>>
>>>> Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com> writes:
>>>>
>>>>> is anyone using the command `C-c C-w' a lot?
>>>> FWIW, I'm not using it at all, but I always thought I *should* :)
>>> No, I don't think so, the agenda is better for looking at deadlines.
>>> This is pretty much obsolete, IMHO.
>>
>> I tried it ages ago just to see what it does but never use it now. The
>> agenda works great for viewing deadlines. Anything that doesn't show up
>> on the agenda just isn't important enough to look at yet from a deadline
>> perspective.
>>
>
> Same. I say free the key-binding for something better :)
>
yes, agenda is enough to look at deadlines.
rainer
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Re: Question: C-c C-w
2007-11-08 9:31 ` Carsten Dominik
2007-11-08 12:57 ` Bernt Hansen
@ 2007-11-09 7:00 ` Giovanni Ridolfi
1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Giovanni Ridolfi @ 2007-11-09 7:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: emacs-orgmode
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 10:31:14AM +0100, Carsten Dominik wrote:
>
> On 8Nov2007, at 12:17 AM, Bastien wrote:
>
>> Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> is anyone using the command `C-c C-w' a lot?
>>
>> FWIW, I'm not using it at all, but I always thought I *should* :)
:-)))
>
> No, I don't think so, the agenda is better for looking at deadlines.
> This is pretty much obsolete, IMHO.
I agree, please remove it.
I've just used it in a long file and I find it not immediate to
read all the file to look for the deadlines.
Yes, the Agenda is better.
Giovanni
--
Giovanni Ridolfi, Chemist
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-11-09 5:55 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-11-07 16:39 Question: C-c C-w Carsten Dominik
2007-11-07 18:46 ` William Henney
2007-11-07 22:48 ` Daniel J. Sinder
2007-11-07 23:17 ` Bastien
2007-11-08 9:31 ` Carsten Dominik
2007-11-08 12:57 ` Bernt Hansen
2007-11-08 14:02 ` Rick Moynihan
2007-11-08 14:55 ` Rainer Stengele
2007-11-09 7:00 ` Giovanni Ridolfi
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).