From: Samuel Wales <samologist@gmail.com>
To: Sebastian Rose <sebastian_rose@gmx.de>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, "Thomas S. Dye" <tsd@tsdye.com>
Subject: Re: checkbox problem
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 10:58:16 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20524da70906191058j1e54c44x33f5ebe1938b9a0@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87r5xgvcvq.fsf@kassiopeya.MSHEIMNETZ>
Interesting.
Just as a brainstorm, I wonder if there is a block that could achieve
the same effect? Or, perhaps, if indentation that looks like the
following could be handled automatically?
- item
- subitem
this is stuff pasted flush left. we know that it is a body because
there is no blank line between subitem and "this is stuff".
this is another paragraph of the body we know that it is still part
of the body because it is followed by a subitem and there is no blank
line after it. this is a little kludgey and maybe there is a better
solution.
- this is another subitem that terminates the plain list item above.
Perhaps this was already considered?
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 01:36, Sebastian Rose<sebastian_rose@gmx.de> wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
>
>
> Lists depend entirely on indentation.
>
> Sidenote:
>
> For long mails and similar texts I use a drawer:
>
>
> (setq org-drawers (quote ("PROPERTIES" "CLOCK" "PHONE" "EMAIL"
> "REMAIL" "HIDDEN" "LOGBOOK")))
>
> :EMAIL: and :REMAIL: are the ones I use for mails from and to
> customers.
>
>
>
>
> Sebastian
>
>
>
> "Thomas S. Dye" <tsd@tsdye.com> writes:
>> Aloha all,
>>
>> First, org-mode is really useful. The more I use it, the more useful it gets
>> and the more I appreciate its flexibility. I've been using it for several
>> months but still feel like a newbie. Perhaps the problem I'm having stems from
>> this.
>>
>> I use the checkbox feature a lot, with good effect, like this:
>>
>> *** Task 1 [/]
>> - [ ] Step 1
>> - [ ] Step 2
>> - [ ] Step 3
>>
>> Recently, I received via email comments from 4 reviewers on a paper I'd
>> submitted for publication. The editor asked me to keep track of how I'd
>> responded to all of the comments, so I tried this:
>>
>> *** Reviewer 1 [/]
>> - [ ] Comment 1
>> - [ ] Comment 2
>> etc.
>>
>> I cut the comments out of the email message and pasted them directly into the
>> org file in Aquamacs Emacs. Some of the comments are quite lengthy, others are
>> short.
>>
>> My problem is that midway down a list of comments org-mode ceases to recognize
>> that the comment checkboxes are associated with the heading. In each case, the
>> last comment checkbox that is correctly associated with the heading formats
>> differently (with Esc-Q) than the comments above it. The comment checkboxes
>> that are associated correctly format as indented blocks with the second and
>> subsequent lines of text left justified on the "[" of the first line. The last
>> associated checkbox justifies the second and subsequent lines two characters
>> left of the "-" of the first line. Subsequent, unassociated checkboxes align
>> the "-" of the first line with last line of the item above it. Here is an
>> example:
>>
>>
>> *** Reviewer 3 [2/6]
>>
>> ... (Several items omitted)
>>
>> - [X] p. 7 In 1779, Kamehameha was a young man on his way up as a
>> favored nephew of Kalaniopu`u, but isn't it a little early to
>> refer to his dynasty?
>> - [X] p. 7 It is true Kamehameha benefited greatly from Western
>> advice and weapons, but the tradition of conquest was well
>> established by the time he embarked on his career as a conqueror by
>> chiefs including Kalaniopu`u, and especially Kahekili.
>> - [X] p. 7 According to traditions 'Umi's father had been recognized
>> as paramount of the island. `Umi regained his father's status by
>> putting down a rebellion of the five districts other than Hamakua
>> and reunited the polity. I think of this as a civil war rather
>> than the capture of territory to which he had no previous claim.
>>
>> In this case the first two items are counted in the headline, but the last one
>> isn't.
>>
>> If someone could point out what might be going wrong, I'll appreciate it.
>>
>> All the best,
>> Tom
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Emacs-orgmode mailing list
> Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
> Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
>
--
Myalgic encephalomyelitis denialism is causing death and severe suffering,
worse than MS. Conflicts of interest are destroying research. /You/ can
get the disease at any time permanently. Do science and justice matter to
you? http://www.meactionuk.org.uk/What_Is_ME_What_Is_CFS.htm
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-19 17:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-16 18:54 checkbox problem Thomas S. Dye
2009-06-19 6:54 ` Manish
2009-06-19 8:36 ` Sebastian Rose
2009-06-19 17:58 ` Samuel Wales [this message]
2009-06-20 19:33 ` Carsten Dominik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.orgmode.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20524da70906191058j1e54c44x33f5ebe1938b9a0@mail.gmail.com \
--to=samologist@gmail.com \
--cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
--cc=sebastian_rose@gmx.de \
--cc=tsd@tsdye.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).