From: Nick Dokos <nicholas.dokos@hp.com>
To: "Andrew J. Korty" <ajk@iu.edu>
Cc: nicholas.dokos@hp.com, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Splitting mailing list
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 21:38:22 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <18463.1298860702@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Message from "Andrew J. Korty" <ajk@iu.edu> of "Sun, 27 Feb 2011 17:53:44 EST." <74194.1298847224@iu.edu>
Andrew J. Korty <ajk@iu.edu> wrote:
> Alan L Tyree <alantyree@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I'm purely a user, but I would not be in favour of splitting the list.
> > I find it interesting to have an insight into what the developers are
> > doing, where org is headed. Use of a DEV tag would be good.
>
> I don't understand. If you like to read the development posts, why not
> subscribe to both lists? My concerns with a DEV tag are twofold: people
> would forget to add it, and it clutters the subject line.
>
Agreed.
> Samuel Wales <samologist@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > The thing that is most difficult for me is the fact that I almost
> > never can read the entire subject header. Often I get to read only
> > the first word. Tags will make that worse.
>
> It was suggested once that we shorten the [Orgmode] tag to [Org]. That
> seems like a change everyone can agree with. Could one of the mailing
> list admins please make that change?
>
Agreed - even though I was probably the most vocal opponent of dropping the
tag altogether, I have no problem with making it shorter.
[Org] looks fine for the current list and if the dev list comes to pass
it could perhaps get an [OrgD] tag (or even [OD]: overdosing on org is a
good thing...)
Thanks,
Nick
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-28 2:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-27 10:30 Splitting mailing list Julien Danjou
2011-02-27 11:43 ` Bastien
2011-02-27 14:09 ` Julien Danjou
2011-02-27 14:19 ` Gour
2011-02-27 14:22 ` Matthew Sauer
2011-02-27 20:49 ` Alan L Tyree
2011-02-27 22:53 ` Andrew J. Korty
2011-02-28 0:15 ` Alan L Tyree
2011-02-28 0:21 ` Matthew Sauer
2011-02-28 20:43 ` Eric S Fraga
2011-02-28 8:48 ` Julien Danjou
2011-02-28 9:48 ` Alan Tyree
2011-02-28 2:38 ` Nick Dokos [this message]
2011-02-28 10:46 ` Bastien
2011-02-28 12:12 ` Julien Danjou
2011-02-28 12:44 ` Bastien
2011-02-28 12:58 ` Jambunathan K
2011-02-28 14:14 ` Julien Danjou
2011-02-28 16:14 ` Nick Dokos
2011-02-28 17:12 ` John Hendy
2011-03-01 11:50 ` Bastien
2011-02-27 21:20 ` Jeff Horn
2011-02-27 21:26 ` Jeff Horn
2011-02-27 22:20 ` Samuel Wales
2011-02-28 10:49 ` Bastien
2011-02-28 15:03 ` Ian Barton
2011-02-28 17:05 ` Samuel Wales
2011-02-28 20:17 ` Konrad Hinsen
2011-02-27 16:23 ` Chris Thompson
2011-02-27 16:56 ` Julien Danjou
2011-02-28 9:50 ` Torsten Wagner
2011-02-28 11:02 ` Let's stick to one list for now (was: Splitting mailing list) Bastien
2011-02-28 11:34 ` Let's stick to one list for now Julien Danjou
2011-02-28 17:06 ` Eric Schulte
2011-02-28 17:09 ` Automatic Org-mode mailing list signature -- Was: [O] " Eric Schulte
2011-02-28 18:14 ` Automatic Org-mode mailing list signature -- Was: " Nicolas
2011-02-28 18:58 ` Eric Schulte
2011-03-01 4:30 ` Automatic Org-mode mailing list signature -- Was: [O] " theo
2011-03-02 17:35 ` Bastien
2011-03-02 17:54 ` Eric Schulte
2011-03-02 18:22 ` Automatic Org-mode mailing list signature -- Was: " Nicolas
2011-03-02 18:51 ` theo
2011-03-03 8:25 ` Bastien
2011-03-03 8:36 ` Gregor Zattler
2011-03-03 13:49 ` Eric S Fraga
2011-03-03 14:01 ` Bernt Hansen
2011-03-03 15:09 ` Julien Danjou
2011-03-03 15:12 ` Carsten Dominik
2011-03-03 16:33 ` Bastien
2011-03-03 17:02 ` Achim Gratz
2011-03-03 17:53 ` Nick Dokos
2011-03-04 9:57 ` Julien Danjou
2011-03-02 21:44 ` Automatic Org-mode mailing list signature -- Was: [O] " Achim Gratz
2011-03-02 22:59 ` suvayu ali
2011-03-03 8:23 ` Bastien
2011-02-28 17:53 ` Dan Davison
2011-02-28 18:10 ` Jambunathan K
2011-02-28 20:23 ` Jeff Horn
2011-03-01 11:55 ` Bastien
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.orgmode.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=18463.1298860702@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org \
--to=nicholas.dokos@hp.com \
--cc=ajk@iu.edu \
--cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).