From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Dokos Subject: Re: Splitting mailing list Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 21:38:22 -0500 Message-ID: <18463.1298860702@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org> References: <87k4gldb1s.fsf@keller.adm.naquadah.org> <87pqqdprxe.fsf@altern.org> <20110228074935.bf0d7ebf.alantyree@gmail.com> <74194.1298847224@iu.edu> Reply-To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=48808 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ptt0Y-00057d-AH for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 21:38:51 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ptt0Q-00019j-Fe for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 21:38:45 -0500 Received: from vms173001pub.verizon.net ([206.46.173.1]:46359) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ptt0Q-00019E-CA for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 21:38:38 -0500 Received: from alphaville.dokosmarshall.org ([unknown] [173.76.32.106]) by vms173001.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPA id <0LHB005BX3BYXE90@vms173001.mailsrvcs.net> for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 20:38:35 -0600 (CST) In-reply-to: Message from "Andrew J. Korty" of "Sun, 27 Feb 2011 17:53:44 EST." <74194.1298847224@iu.edu> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: "Andrew J. Korty" Cc: nicholas.dokos@hp.com, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Andrew J. Korty wrote: > Alan L Tyree wrote: > > > I'm purely a user, but I would not be in favour of splitting the list. > > I find it interesting to have an insight into what the developers are > > doing, where org is headed. Use of a DEV tag would be good. > > I don't understand. If you like to read the development posts, why not > subscribe to both lists? My concerns with a DEV tag are twofold: people > would forget to add it, and it clutters the subject line. > Agreed. > Samuel Wales wrote: > > > The thing that is most difficult for me is the fact that I almost > > never can read the entire subject header. Often I get to read only > > the first word. Tags will make that worse. > > It was suggested once that we shorten the [Orgmode] tag to [Org]. That > seems like a change everyone can agree with. Could one of the mailing > list admins please make that change? > Agreed - even though I was probably the most vocal opponent of dropping the tag altogether, I have no problem with making it shorter. [Org] looks fine for the current list and if the dev list comes to pass it could perhaps get an [OrgD] tag (or even [OD]: overdosing on org is a good thing...) Thanks, Nick