Internal links in LaTeX export

Internal links in LaTeX export

[Thomas S. Dye]

Aloha all,

The manual is silent about what happens to external links on export to  
LaTeX.  I'm finding that internal links export to HTML and work as  
expected there.  In the pdf file via LaTeX the internal links are  
colored, but aren't active.  Is this the expected behavior or am I  
possibly doing something that disables the links on their way to pdf?

All the best,
Tom

Re: Internal links in LaTeX export

[Sébastien Vauban]

Hi Thomas,

"Thomas S. Dye" wrote:
> The manual is silent about what happens to external links on export to
> LaTeX. I'm finding that internal links export to HTML and work as expected
> there. In the pdf file via LaTeX the internal links are colored, but aren't
> active. Is this the expected behavior or am I possibly doing something that
> disables the links on their way to pdf?

Internal links always worked for me in PDF, though they more tend(ed) to go
to the page rather than really placing me on the section (like what you have
in your browser).

Questions:

- Which PDF reader do you use?  That could influence...

- Do you want me to test some example file?  If yes, send it here, or
  privately to me -- attention for delays due to spammotel, though.

Best regards,
  Seb

-- 
Sébastien Vauban


_______________________________________________
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode

Re: Re: Internal links in LaTeX export

[Thomas S. Dye]

On Oct 28, 2010, at 10:18 AM, Sébastien Vauban wrote:

> Hi Thomas,
>
> "Thomas S. Dye" wrote:
>> The manual is silent about what happens to external links on export  
>> to
>> LaTeX. I'm finding that internal links export to HTML and work as  
>> expected
>> there. In the pdf file via LaTeX the internal links are colored,  
>> but aren't
>> active. Is this the expected behavior or am I possibly doing  
>> something that
>> disables the links on their way to pdf?
>
> Internal links always worked for me in PDF, though they more  
> tend(ed) to go
> to the page rather than really placing me on the section (like what  
> you have
> in your browser).
>
> Questions:
>
> - Which PDF reader do you use?  That could influence...
>
> - Do you want me to test some example file?  If yes, send it here, or
>  privately to me -- attention for delays due to spammotel, though.
>
> Best regards,
>  Seb

Thanks Seb,

It doesn't appear to be a reader problem.  The links fail in skim and  
acrobat.

I'm getting this in the LaTeX output:
\href{sec-2_5}{package loading part}

If I read the hyperref documentation correctly, then I think it should  
be:
\hyperref[sec-2_5]{package loading part}

If I'm right about what the link should look like in LaTeX, and there  
is no obvious reason why I'm not getting it in the LaTeX export, then  
I'll work on finding a minimal example.

All the best,
Tom

Re: Internal links in LaTeX export

[Jambunathan K]

"Thomas S. Dye" <tsd@tsdye.com> writes:

> On Oct 28, 2010, at 10:18 AM, Sébastien Vauban wrote:
>
>> Hi Thomas,
>>
>> "Thomas S. Dye" wrote:
>>> The manual is silent about what happens to external links on export
>>> to
>>> LaTeX. I'm finding that internal links export to HTML and work as
>>> expected
>>> there. In the pdf file via LaTeX the internal links are colored,
>>> but aren't
>>> active. Is this the expected behavior or am I possibly doing
>>> something that
>>> disables the links on their way to pdf?
>>
>> Internal links always worked for me in PDF, though they more
>> tend(ed) to go
>> to the page rather than really placing me on the section (like what
>> you have
>> in your browser).
>>
>> Questions:
>>
>> - Which PDF reader do you use?  That could influence...
>>
>> - Do you want me to test some example file?  If yes, send it here, or
>>  privately to me -- attention for delays due to spammotel, though.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>  Seb
>
> Thanks Seb,
>
> It doesn't appear to be a reader problem.  The links fail in skim and
> acrobat.
>
> I'm getting this in the LaTeX output:
> \href{sec-2_5}{package loading part}
>
> If I read the hyperref documentation correctly, then I think it should
> be:
> \hyperref[sec-2_5]{package loading part}
>
> If I'm right about what the link should look like in LaTeX, and there
> is no obvious reason why I'm not getting it in the LaTeX export, then
> I'll work on finding a minimal example.
>

Play with this (for now).

,----[ C-h v org-export-latex-hyperref-format RET ]
| org-export-latex-hyperref-format is a variable defined in `org-latex.el'.
| Its value is "\\href{%s}{%s}"
| 
| Documentation:
| A printf format string to be applied to hyperref links.
| The format must contain two %s instances.  The first will be filled with
| the link, the second with the link description.
| 
| You can customize this variable.
`----

This is a regression. release-7.01h is good. HEAD is bad. I get the
following line with release-7.01h.

  Links to \hyperref[sec-1]{Heading1}

Jambunathan K.


> All the best,
> Tom
> _______________________________________________
> Emacs-orgmode mailing list
> Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
> Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode

Re: Internal links in LaTeX export

[Thomas S. Dye]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2609 bytes --]


On Oct 28, 2010, at 11:01 AM, Jambunathan K wrote:

> "Thomas S. Dye" <tsd@tsdye.com> writes:
>
>> On Oct 28, 2010, at 10:18 AM, Sébastien Vauban wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Thomas,
>>>
>>> "Thomas S. Dye" wrote:
>>>> The manual is silent about what happens to external links on export
>>>> to
>>>> LaTeX. I'm finding that internal links export to HTML and work as
>>>> expected
>>>> there. In the pdf file via LaTeX the internal links are colored,
>>>> but aren't
>>>> active. Is this the expected behavior or am I possibly doing
>>>> something that
>>>> disables the links on their way to pdf?
>>>
>>> Internal links always worked for me in PDF, though they more
>>> tend(ed) to go
>>> to the page rather than really placing me on the section (like what
>>> you have
>>> in your browser).
>>>
>>> Questions:
>>>
>>> - Which PDF reader do you use?  That could influence...
>>>
>>> - Do you want me to test some example file?  If yes, send it here,  
>>> or
>>> privately to me -- attention for delays due to spammotel, though.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Seb
>>
>> Thanks Seb,
>>
>> It doesn't appear to be a reader problem.  The links fail in skim and
>> acrobat.
>>
>> I'm getting this in the LaTeX output:
>> \href{sec-2_5}{package loading part}
>>
>> If I read the hyperref documentation correctly, then I think it  
>> should
>> be:
>> \hyperref[sec-2_5]{package loading part}
>>
>> If I'm right about what the link should look like in LaTeX, and there
>> is no obvious reason why I'm not getting it in the LaTeX export, then
>> I'll work on finding a minimal example.
>>
>
> Play with this (for now).
>
> ,----[ C-h v org-export-latex-hyperref-format RET ]
> | org-export-latex-hyperref-format is a variable defined in `org- 
> latex.el'.
> | Its value is "\\href{%s}{%s}"
> |
> | Documentation:
> | A printf format string to be applied to hyperref links.
> | The format must contain two %s instances.  The first will be  
> filled with
> | the link, the second with the link description.
> |
> | You can customize this variable.
> `----
>
> This is a regression. release-7.01h is good. HEAD is bad. I get the
> following line with release-7.01h.
>
>  Links to \hyperref[sec-1]{Heading1}
>
> Jambunathan K.
>

Aloha Jambunathan K.,

Very many thanks for this information.  I have Org-mode version  
7.01trans (release_7.01h.880.g7531f).  I take it the problem I'm  
having is due to a relatively recent change to Org-mode.  If there is  
anything I can do to help isolate the problem, please let me know.

All the best,
Tom


[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 6126 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 201 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode

Re: Re: Internal links in LaTeX export

[Nick Dokos]

Thomas S. Dye <tsd@tsdye.com> wrote:

> On Oct 28, 2010, at 11:01 AM, Jambunathan K wrote:
> 
>    
>     This is a regression. release-7.01h is good. HEAD is bad. I get the
>     following line with release-7.01h.
>    
>      Links to \hyperref[sec-1]{Heading1}
>    
>     Jambunathan K.
> 
> Aloha Jambunathan K.,
> 
> Very many thanks for this information.  I have Org-mode version 7.01trans
> (release_7.01h.880.g7531f).  I take it the problem I'm having is due to a relatively recent change
> to Org-mode.  If there is anything I can do to help isolate the problem, please let me know.
> 

Tom,

If you have the time and the inclination, you might try bisecting your
way through. Bisecting org-mode problems is actually a very good way to
practice because the turnaround time is very small.

Prerequisites:

* you have a clone of the org-mode git repository.

* you have an org test file.


Steps:

* [optional, but it makes me feel a little safer] create a test branch
  and switch to it:

  git checkout -b test-branch master

* I clean out all the compiled files while doing a bisection: it's quicker
  than regenerating them every time and I don't have to worry (much) about
  emacs loading a wayward .elc file:

  make clean

* start the bisection and tell git which commit is known good and which is known bad:

  git bisect start

  # current version is bad
  git bisect bad

  # release_7.01h was good - I got the name with ``git tag''
  git bisect good release_7.01h

That checks out a revision half-way in between the bad and good commits: since
there are about 900 commits in between, you'll be at approx the 450-mark and it
should take about 10 bisections to get it down to a single commit.

* LOOP Now all you have to do is repeat the following steps:

  # since you did ``make clean'' you don't have to worry about .elc files
  # just reload all the .el files.
  M-x org-reload

  visit your org test file, export to LaTeX, check for \href/\hyperref (or
  whatever other telltale sign shows badness/goodness).

  # tell git about it
  git bisect good *OR* git bisect bad

This last step will check out another revision and in about 10 repetitions
of the loop, you are done.

* Tell git you are done, so it can clean up:

  git bisect reset

Theoretically, you could do all of this in your master branch without
creating a test-branch and this last step will reset everything to the
way it was before ``git start''.

* Post the offending commit to the list.

* Get back to your master branch:

  git checkout master

* If you created a test-branch, clean it out:

  git branch -d test-branch

* [Optional] Recreate your .elc files and reload them:

  make
  M-x org-reload


And that's it: a half-hour of fun and games. Unless of course, you
hit upon a revision that is neither good nor bad (in the above restricted
sense): you might get some other problem that prevents you from being
able to answer. That might or might not be easy to resolve, so I'll
leave that as an advanced topic (truth be told, I came up against this
situation a couple of days ago and I didn't know how to proceed: so
it's ignorance more than anything else that prevents me from saying
anything more).

If you want to try, I'd be happy to answer questions - I might try the
bisection later on tonight myself in any case. And btw, this is of
course archeology of a different (and much easier) kind, so I imagine
you'll take to it like a fish in water :-)

HTH,
Nick

Re: Re: Internal links in LaTeX export

[Thomas S. Dye]

On Oct 28, 2010, at 12:35 PM, Nick Dokos wrote:

> Thomas S. Dye <tsd@tsdye.com> wrote:
>
>> On Oct 28, 2010, at 11:01 AM, Jambunathan K wrote:
>>
>>
>>    This is a regression. release-7.01h is good. HEAD is bad. I get  
>> the
>>    following line with release-7.01h.
>>
>>     Links to \hyperref[sec-1]{Heading1}
>>
>>    Jambunathan K.
>>
>> Aloha Jambunathan K.,
>>
>> Very many thanks for this information.  I have Org-mode version  
>> 7.01trans
>> (release_7.01h.880.g7531f).  I take it the problem I'm having is  
>> due to a relatively recent change
>> to Org-mode.  If there is anything I can do to help isolate the  
>> problem, please let me know.
>>
>
> Tom,
>
> If you have the time and the inclination, you might try bisecting your
> way through. Bisecting org-mode problems is actually a very good way  
> to
> practice because the turnaround time is very small.
>
> Prerequisites:
>
> * you have a clone of the org-mode git repository.
>
> * you have an org test file.
>
>
> Steps:
>
> * [optional, but it makes me feel a little safer] create a test branch
>  and switch to it:
>
>  git checkout -b test-branch master
>
> * I clean out all the compiled files while doing a bisection: it's  
> quicker
>  than regenerating them every time and I don't have to worry (much)  
> about
>  emacs loading a wayward .elc file:
>
>  make clean
>
> * start the bisection and tell git which commit is known good and  
> which is known bad:
>
>  git bisect start
>
>  # current version is bad
>  git bisect bad
>
>  # release_7.01h was good - I got the name with ``git tag''
>  git bisect good release_7.01h
>
> That checks out a revision half-way in between the bad and good  
> commits: since
> there are about 900 commits in between, you'll be at approx the 450- 
> mark and it
> should take about 10 bisections to get it down to a single commit.
>
> * LOOP Now all you have to do is repeat the following steps:
>
>  # since you did ``make clean'' you don't have to worry about .elc  
> files
>  # just reload all the .el files.
>  M-x org-reload
>
>  visit your org test file, export to LaTeX, check for \href/ 
> \hyperref (or
>  whatever other telltale sign shows badness/goodness).
>
>  # tell git about it
>  git bisect good *OR* git bisect bad
>
> This last step will check out another revision and in about 10  
> repetitions
> of the loop, you are done.
>
> * Tell git you are done, so it can clean up:
>
>  git bisect reset
>
> Theoretically, you could do all of this in your master branch without
> creating a test-branch and this last step will reset everything to the
> way it was before ``git start''.
>
> * Post the offending commit to the list.
>
> * Get back to your master branch:
>
>  git checkout master
>
> * If you created a test-branch, clean it out:
>
>  git branch -d test-branch
>
> * [Optional] Recreate your .elc files and reload them:
>
>  make
>  M-x org-reload
>
>
> And that's it: a half-hour of fun and games. Unless of course, you
> hit upon a revision that is neither good nor bad (in the above  
> restricted
> sense): you might get some other problem that prevents you from being
> able to answer. That might or might not be easy to resolve, so I'll
> leave that as an advanced topic (truth be told, I came up against this
> situation a couple of days ago and I didn't know how to proceed: so
> it's ignorance more than anything else that prevents me from saying
> anything more).
>
> If you want to try, I'd be happy to answer questions - I might try the
> bisection later on tonight myself in any case. And btw, this is of
> course archeology of a different (and much easier) kind, so I imagine
> you'll take to it like a fish in water :-)
>
> HTH,
> Nick

Hi Nick,

Irresistible hook at the end there.  I wish this stuff were as easy as  
archaeology is for me.  Your instructions are terrific, though.

I did hit on a revision that was neither good nor bad:

commit 8562273b272024a630a582b0e1b94c481d8abeec
Author: Eric Schulte <schulte.eric@gmail.com>
Date:   Sat Oct 16 13:21:47 2010 -0600

     ob-ref: don't forget arguments to referenced code blocks

     * lisp/ob-ref.el (org-babel-ref-resolve): bringing the referent
       arguments back to their params before evaluation

This one puts these lines in *Messages* when I export to LaTeX

executing Org code block...
if: Symbol's value as variable is void: result-type

I tried using different commits for the initial git bisect good,  
hoping that would skip by the problem, but this one appears to have  
stuck around a while.  My other two tries both ended with this same  
error, but with different commits.

I'm not sure what to do next.  This problem isn't yielding to my  
archaeo-logic. :)

All the best,
Tom

Re: Re: Internal links in LaTeX export

[Jambunathan K]

Thomas

There was a hint at possible solution (or atleast a partial solution) in
my original post. Did you try it before jumping in to rough waters or
digging deeper?

Do 

,----
| M-x customize-variable RET org-export-latex-hyperref-format' 
`----

so that your .emacs has an entry like this

,---- [.emacs]
| 
| (custom-set-variables
|  '(org-export-latex-hyperref-format "\\hyperref[%s]{%s}"))
| 
`----

The above setting solves the problem for me with the following simple
Org file.

* Heading1
  Make this section as large as possible so that it fills atleast a
  page.

* Heading2
  Links to [[Heading1]]

Jambunathan K.

"Thomas S. Dye" <tsd@tsdye.com> writes:

> On Oct 28, 2010, at 12:35 PM, Nick Dokos wrote:
>
>> Thomas S. Dye <tsd@tsdye.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Oct 28, 2010, at 11:01 AM, Jambunathan K wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>    This is a regression. release-7.01h is good. HEAD is bad. I get
>>> the
>>>    following line with release-7.01h.
>>>
>>>     Links to \hyperref[sec-1]{Heading1}
>>>
>>>    Jambunathan K.
>>>
>>> Aloha Jambunathan K.,
>>>
>>> Very many thanks for this information.  I have Org-mode version
>>> 7.01trans
>>> (release_7.01h.880.g7531f).  I take it the problem I'm having is
>>> due to a relatively recent change
>>> to Org-mode.  If there is anything I can do to help isolate the
>>> problem, please let me know.
>>>
>>
>> Tom,
>>
>> If you have the time and the inclination, you might try bisecting your
>> way through. Bisecting org-mode problems is actually a very good way
>> to
>> practice because the turnaround time is very small.
>>
>> Prerequisites:
>>
>> * you have a clone of the org-mode git repository.
>>
>> * you have an org test file.
>>
>>
>> Steps:
>>
>> * [optional, but it makes me feel a little safer] create a test branch
>>  and switch to it:
>>
>>  git checkout -b test-branch master
>>
>> * I clean out all the compiled files while doing a bisection: it's
>> quicker
>>  than regenerating them every time and I don't have to worry (much)
>> about
>>  emacs loading a wayward .elc file:
>>
>>  make clean
>>
>> * start the bisection and tell git which commit is known good and
>> which is known bad:
>>
>>  git bisect start
>>
>>  # current version is bad
>>  git bisect bad
>>
>>  # release_7.01h was good - I got the name with ``git tag''
>>  git bisect good release_7.01h
>>
>> That checks out a revision half-way in between the bad and good
>> commits: since
>> there are about 900 commits in between, you'll be at approx the 450-
>> mark and it
>> should take about 10 bisections to get it down to a single commit.
>>
>> * LOOP Now all you have to do is repeat the following steps:
>>
>>  # since you did ``make clean'' you don't have to worry about .elc
>> files
>>  # just reload all the .el files.
>>  M-x org-reload
>>
>>  visit your org test file, export to LaTeX, check for \href/
>> \hyperref (or
>>  whatever other telltale sign shows badness/goodness).
>>
>>  # tell git about it
>>  git bisect good *OR* git bisect bad
>>
>> This last step will check out another revision and in about 10
>> repetitions
>> of the loop, you are done.
>>
>> * Tell git you are done, so it can clean up:
>>
>>  git bisect reset
>>
>> Theoretically, you could do all of this in your master branch without
>> creating a test-branch and this last step will reset everything to the
>> way it was before ``git start''.
>>
>> * Post the offending commit to the list.
>>
>> * Get back to your master branch:
>>
>>  git checkout master
>>
>> * If you created a test-branch, clean it out:
>>
>>  git branch -d test-branch
>>
>> * [Optional] Recreate your .elc files and reload them:
>>
>>  make
>>  M-x org-reload
>>
>>
>> And that's it: a half-hour of fun and games. Unless of course, you
>> hit upon a revision that is neither good nor bad (in the above
>> restricted
>> sense): you might get some other problem that prevents you from being
>> able to answer. That might or might not be easy to resolve, so I'll
>> leave that as an advanced topic (truth be told, I came up against this
>> situation a couple of days ago and I didn't know how to proceed: so
>> it's ignorance more than anything else that prevents me from saying
>> anything more).
>>
>> If you want to try, I'd be happy to answer questions - I might try the
>> bisection later on tonight myself in any case. And btw, this is of
>> course archeology of a different (and much easier) kind, so I imagine
>> you'll take to it like a fish in water :-)
>>
>> HTH,
>> Nick
>
> Hi Nick,
>
> Irresistible hook at the end there.  I wish this stuff were as easy as
> archaeology is for me.  Your instructions are terrific, though.
>
> I did hit on a revision that was neither good nor bad:
>
> commit 8562273b272024a630a582b0e1b94c481d8abeec
> Author: Eric Schulte <schulte.eric@gmail.com>
> Date:   Sat Oct 16 13:21:47 2010 -0600
>
>     ob-ref: don't forget arguments to referenced code blocks
>
>     * lisp/ob-ref.el (org-babel-ref-resolve): bringing the referent
>       arguments back to their params before evaluation
>
> This one puts these lines in *Messages* when I export to LaTeX
>
> executing Org code block...
> if: Symbol's value as variable is void: result-type
>
> I tried using different commits for the initial git bisect good,
> hoping that would skip by the problem, but this one appears to have
> stuck around a while.  My other two tries both ended with this same
> error, but with different commits.
>
> I'm not sure what to do next.  This problem isn't yielding to my
> archaeo-logic. :)
>
> All the best,
> Tom

Re: Re: Internal links in LaTeX export

[Thomas S. Dye]

Aloha Jambunathan K.,

Yes, thanks for that suggestion.  It should work on your example, but  
it breaks external links, like this:

\hyperref[http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/macros/latex/contrib/koma-script/ 
]{KOMA-script}

External links require the \href{}{} command.  It appears the LaTeX  
export process no longer distinguishes internal and external links, as  
I believe it used to do.

All the best,
Tom

On Oct 28, 2010, at 3:30 PM, Jambunathan K wrote:

>
> Thomas
>
> There was a hint at possible solution (or atleast a partial  
> solution) in
> my original post. Did you try it before jumping in to rough waters or
> digging deeper?
>
> Do
>
> ,----
> | M-x customize-variable RET org-export-latex-hyperref-format'
> `----
>
> so that your .emacs has an entry like this
>
> ,---- [.emacs]
> |
> | (custom-set-variables
> |  '(org-export-latex-hyperref-format "\\hyperref[%s]{%s}"))
> |
> `----
>
> The above setting solves the problem for me with the following simple
> Org file.
>
> * Heading1
>  Make this section as large as possible so that it fills atleast a
>  page.
>
> * Heading2
>  Links to [[Heading1]]
>
> Jambunathan K.
>
> "Thomas S. Dye" <tsd@tsdye.com> writes:
>
>> On Oct 28, 2010, at 12:35 PM, Nick Dokos wrote:
>>
>>> Thomas S. Dye <tsd@tsdye.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Oct 28, 2010, at 11:01 AM, Jambunathan K wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>   This is a regression. release-7.01h is good. HEAD is bad. I get
>>>> the
>>>>   following line with release-7.01h.<
>>>>
>>>>    Links to \hyperref[sec-1]{Heading1}
>>>>
>>>>   Jambunathan K.
>>>>
>>>> Aloha Jambunathan K.,
>>>>
>>>> Very many thanks for this information.  I have Org-mode version
>>>> 7.01trans
>>>> (release_7.01h.880.g7531f).  I take it the problem I'm having is
>>>> due to a relatively recent change
>>>> to Org-mode.  If there is anything I can do to help isolate the
>>>> problem, please let me know.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Tom,
>>>
>>> If you have the time and the inclination, you might try bisecting  
>>> your
>>> way through. Bisecting org-mode problems is actually a very good way
>>> to
>>> practice because the turnaround time is very small.
>>>
>>> Prerequisites:
>>>
>>> * you have a clone of the org-mode git repository.
>>>
>>> * you have an org test file.
>>>
>>>
>>> Steps:
>>>
>>> * [optional, but it makes me feel a little safer] create a test  
>>> branch
>>> and switch to it:
>>>
>>> git checkout -b test-branch master
>>>
>>> * I clean out all the compiled files while doing a bisection: it's
>>> quicker
>>> than regenerating them every time and I don't have to worry (much)
>>> about
>>> emacs loading a wayward .elc file:
>>>
>>> make clean
>>>
>>> * start the bisection and tell git which commit is known good and
>>> which is known bad:
>>>
>>> git bisect start
>>>
>>> # current version is bad
>>> git bisect bad
>>>
>>> # release_7.01h was good - I got the name with ``git tag''
>>> git bisect good release_7.01h
>>>
>>> That checks out a revision half-way in between the bad and good
>>> commits: since
>>> there are about 900 commits in between, you'll be at approx the 450-
>>> mark and it
>>> should take about 10 bisections to get it down to a single commit.
>>>
>>> * LOOP Now all you have to do is repeat the following steps:
>>>
>>> # since you did ``make clean'' you don't have to worry about .elc
>>> files
>>> # just reload all the .el files.
>>> M-x org-reload
>>>
>>> visit your org test file, export to LaTeX, check for \href/
>>> \hyperref (or
>>> whatever other telltale sign shows badness/goodness).
>>>
>>> # tell git about it
>>> git bisect good *OR* git bisect bad
>>>
>>> This last step will check out another revision and in about 10
>>> repetitions
>>> of the loop, you are done.
>>>
>>> * Tell git you are done, so it can clean up:
>>>
>>> git bisect reset
>>>
>>> Theoretically, you could do all of this in your master branch  
>>> without
>>> creating a test-branch and this last step will reset everything to  
>>> the
>>> way it was before ``git start''.
>>>
>>> * Post the offending commit to the list.
>>>
>>> * Get back to your master branch:
>>>
>>> git checkout master
>>>
>>> * If you created a test-branch, clean it out:
>>>
>>> git branch -d test-branch
>>>
>>> * [Optional] Recreate your .elc files and reload them:
>>>
>>> make
>>> M-x org-reload
>>>
>>>
>>> And that's it: a half-hour of fun and games. Unless of course, you
>>> hit upon a revision that is neither good nor bad (in the above
>>> restricted
>>> sense): you might get some other problem that prevents you from  
>>> being
>>> able to answer. That might or might not be easy to resolve, so I'll
>>> leave that as an advanced topic (truth be told, I came up against  
>>> this
>>> situation a couple of days ago and I didn't know how to proceed: so
>>> it's ignorance more than anything else that prevents me from saying
>>> anything more).
>>>
>>> If you want to try, I'd be happy to answer questions - I might try  
>>> the
>>> bisection later on tonight myself in any case. And btw, this is of
>>> course archeology of a different (and much easier) kind, so I  
>>> imagine
>>> you'll take to it like a fish in water :-)
>>>
>>> HTH,
>>> Nick
>>
>> Hi Nick,
>>
>> Irresistible hook at the end there.  I wish this stuff were as easy  
>> as
>> archaeology is for me.  Your instructions are terrific, though.
>>
>> I did hit on a revision that was neither good nor bad:
>>
>> commit 8562273b272024a630a582b0e1b94c481d8abeec
>> Author: Eric Schulte <schulte.eric@gmail.com>
>> Date:   Sat Oct 16 13:21:47 2010 -0600
>>
>>    ob-ref: don't forget arguments to referenced code blocks
>>
>>    * lisp/ob-ref.el (org-babel-ref-resolve): bringing the referent
>>      arguments back to their params before evaluation
>>
>> This one puts these lines in *Messages* when I export to LaTeX
>>
>> executing Org code block...
>> if: Symbol's value as variable is void: result-type
>>
>> I tried using different commits for the initial git bisect good,
>> hoping that would skip by the problem, but this one appears to have
>> stuck around a while.  My other two tries both ended with this same
>> error, but with different commits.
>>
>> I'm not sure what to do next.  This problem isn't yielding to my
>> archaeo-logic. :)
>>
>> All the best,
>> Tom

Re: [SOLVED] Re: Internal links in LaTeX export

[Jambunathan K]

"Thomas S. Dye" <tsd@tsdye.com> writes:

> Aloha Jambunathan K.,
>
> Yes, thanks for that suggestion.  It should work on your example, but
> it breaks external links, like this:
>
> \hyperref[http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/macros/latex/contrib/koma-script/
> ]{KOMA-script}
>
> External links require the \href{}{} command.  It appears the LaTeX
> export process no longer distinguishes internal and external links, as
> I believe it used to do.
>

This is the problematic commit:

commit f5918bdcc05d7924dc204b57307023eb1ef011f0
parent	df5894cdcb10819560f003c5b94b8f5f2b7d33cf
Date:   Sun Oct 17 08:29:51 2010 +0000

    LaTeX export: use org-export-latex-hyperref-format
    
    * lisp/org-latex.el (org-export-latex-links) : Replaced hard coded
    hyperref format with custom
      variable `org-export-latex-hyperref-format'

Note that href is not same as hyperref.

Jambunthan K.


> All the best,
> Tom
>
> On Oct 28, 2010, at 3:30 PM, Jambunathan K wrote:
>
>>
>> Thomas
>>
>> There was a hint at possible solution (or atleast a partial
>> solution) in
>> my original post. Did you try it before jumping in to rough waters or
>> digging deeper?
>>
>> Do
>>
>> ,----
>> | M-x customize-variable RET org-export-latex-hyperref-format'
>> `----
>>
>> so that your .emacs has an entry like this
>>
>> ,---- [.emacs]
>> |
>> | (custom-set-variables
>> |  '(org-export-latex-hyperref-format "\\hyperref[%s]{%s}"))
>> |
>> `----
>>
>> The above setting solves the problem for me with the following simple
>> Org file.
>>
>> * Heading1
>>  Make this section as large as possible so that it fills atleast a
>>  page.
>>
>> * Heading2
>>  Links to [[Heading1]]
>>
>> Jambunathan K.
>>
>> "Thomas S. Dye" <tsd@tsdye.com> writes:
>>
>>> On Oct 28, 2010, at 12:35 PM, Nick Dokos wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thomas S. Dye <tsd@tsdye.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Oct 28, 2010, at 11:01 AM, Jambunathan K wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>   This is a regression. release-7.01h is good. HEAD is bad. I get
>>>>> the
>>>>>   following line with release-7.01h.<
>>>>>
>>>>>    Links to \hyperref[sec-1]{Heading1}
>>>>>
>>>>>   Jambunathan K.
>>>>>
>>>>> Aloha Jambunathan K.,
>>>>>
>>>>> Very many thanks for this information.  I have Org-mode version
>>>>> 7.01trans
>>>>> (release_7.01h.880.g7531f).  I take it the problem I'm having is
>>>>> due to a relatively recent change
>>>>> to Org-mode.  If there is anything I can do to help isolate the
>>>>> problem, please let me know.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Tom,
>>>>
>>>> If you have the time and the inclination, you might try bisecting
>>>> your
>>>> way through. Bisecting org-mode problems is actually a very good way
>>>> to
>>>> practice because the turnaround time is very small.
>>>>
>>>> Prerequisites:
>>>>
>>>> * you have a clone of the org-mode git repository.
>>>>
>>>> * you have an org test file.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Steps:
>>>>
>>>> * [optional, but it makes me feel a little safer] create a test
>>>> branch
>>>> and switch to it:
>>>>
>>>> git checkout -b test-branch master
>>>>
>>>> * I clean out all the compiled files while doing a bisection: it's
>>>> quicker
>>>> than regenerating them every time and I don't have to worry (much)
>>>> about
>>>> emacs loading a wayward .elc file:
>>>>
>>>> make clean
>>>>
>>>> * start the bisection and tell git which commit is known good and
>>>> which is known bad:
>>>>
>>>> git bisect start
>>>>
>>>> # current version is bad
>>>> git bisect bad
>>>>
>>>> # release_7.01h was good - I got the name with ``git tag''
>>>> git bisect good release_7.01h
>>>>
>>>> That checks out a revision half-way in between the bad and good
>>>> commits: since
>>>> there are about 900 commits in between, you'll be at approx the 450-
>>>> mark and it
>>>> should take about 10 bisections to get it down to a single commit.
>>>>
>>>> * LOOP Now all you have to do is repeat the following steps:
>>>>
>>>> # since you did ``make clean'' you don't have to worry about .elc
>>>> files
>>>> # just reload all the .el files.
>>>> M-x org-reload
>>>>
>>>> visit your org test file, export to LaTeX, check for \href/
>>>> \hyperref (or
>>>> whatever other telltale sign shows badness/goodness).
>>>>
>>>> # tell git about it
>>>> git bisect good *OR* git bisect bad
>>>>
>>>> This last step will check out another revision and in about 10
>>>> repetitions
>>>> of the loop, you are done.
>>>>
>>>> * Tell git you are done, so it can clean up:
>>>>
>>>> git bisect reset
>>>>
>>>> Theoretically, you could do all of this in your master branch
>>>> without
>>>> creating a test-branch and this last step will reset everything to
>>>> the
>>>> way it was before ``git start''.
>>>>
>>>> * Post the offending commit to the list.
>>>>
>>>> * Get back to your master branch:
>>>>
>>>> git checkout master
>>>>
>>>> * If you created a test-branch, clean it out:
>>>>
>>>> git branch -d test-branch
>>>>
>>>> * [Optional] Recreate your .elc files and reload them:
>>>>
>>>> make
>>>> M-x org-reload
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> And that's it: a half-hour of fun and games. Unless of course, you
>>>> hit upon a revision that is neither good nor bad (in the above
>>>> restricted
>>>> sense): you might get some other problem that prevents you from
>>>> being
>>>> able to answer. That might or might not be easy to resolve, so I'll
>>>> leave that as an advanced topic (truth be told, I came up against
>>>> this
>>>> situation a couple of days ago and I didn't know how to proceed: so
>>>> it's ignorance more than anything else that prevents me from saying
>>>> anything more).
>>>>
>>>> If you want to try, I'd be happy to answer questions - I might try
>>>> the
>>>> bisection later on tonight myself in any case. And btw, this is of
>>>> course archeology of a different (and much easier) kind, so I
>>>> imagine
>>>> you'll take to it like a fish in water :-)
>>>>
>>>> HTH,
>>>> Nick
>>>
>>> Hi Nick,
>>>
>>> Irresistible hook at the end there.  I wish this stuff were as easy
>>> as
>>> archaeology is for me.  Your instructions are terrific, though.
>>>
>>> I did hit on a revision that was neither good nor bad:
>>>
>>> commit 8562273b272024a630a582b0e1b94c481d8abeec
>>> Author: Eric Schulte <schulte.eric@gmail.com>
>>> Date:   Sat Oct 16 13:21:47 2010 -0600
>>>
>>>    ob-ref: don't forget arguments to referenced code blocks
>>>
>>>    * lisp/ob-ref.el (org-babel-ref-resolve): bringing the referent
>>>      arguments back to their params before evaluation
>>>
>>> This one puts these lines in *Messages* when I export to LaTeX
>>>
>>> executing Org code block...
>>> if: Symbol's value as variable is void: result-type
>>>
>>> I tried using different commits for the initial git bisect good,
>>> hoping that would skip by the problem, but this one appears to have
>>> stuck around a while.  My other two tries both ended with this same
>>> error, but with different commits.
>>>
>>> I'm not sure what to do next.  This problem isn't yielding to my
>>> archaeo-logic. :)
>>>
>>> All the best,
>>> Tom

Re: Re: Internal links in LaTeX export

[Nick Dokos]

Thomas S. Dye <tsd@tsdye.com> wrote:

> ...
> I did hit on a revision that was neither good nor bad:
> 
> commit 8562273b272024a630a582b0e1b94c481d8abeec
> Author: Eric Schulte <schulte.eric@gmail.com>
> Date:   Sat Oct 16 13:21:47 2010 -0600
> 
>     ob-ref: don't forget arguments to referenced code blocks
> 
>     * lisp/ob-ref.el (org-babel-ref-resolve): bringing the referent
>       arguments back to their params before evaluation
> 
> This one puts these lines in *Messages* when I export to LaTeX
> 
> executing Org code block...
> if: Symbol's value as variable is void: result-type
> 

Yeah, that was the error that stopped me cold as well, although I hit it
on a different commit (I think) - there must be a way to get around the
problem but it certainly makes things more difficult.  I imagine the way
to go is to find a commit before this error was introduced and a commit
after it was fixed and try those with your problem: it might allow you
to bypass the problematic range (in which case, you might be able to
continue bisecting all the way to the end), or it might limit the bad
commit to this range - the latter is still valuable to know but
certainly not as definitive as "this is the bad commit".  And in any
case, all of this would fall into the "advanced" appendix in the git
bisection book.

Sorry it didn't pan out but I hope that you had fun digging,

Nick

Re: [SOLVED] Re: Internal links in LaTeX export

[Carsten Dominik]

On Oct 29, 2010, at 5:22 AM, Jambunathan K wrote:

> "Thomas S. Dye" <tsd@tsdye.com> writes:
>
>> Aloha Jambunathan K.,
>>
>> Yes, thanks for that suggestion.  It should work on your example, but
>> it breaks external links, like this:
>>
>> \hyperref[http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/macros/latex/contrib/koma-script/
>> ]{KOMA-script}
>>
>> External links require the \href{}{} command.  It appears the LaTeX
>> export process no longer distinguishes internal and external links,  
>> as
>> I believe it used to do.
>>
>
> This is the problematic commit:
>
> commit f5918bdcc05d7924dc204b57307023eb1ef011f0
> parent	df5894cdcb10819560f003c5b94b8f5f2b7d33cf
> Date:   Sun Oct 17 08:29:51 2010 +0000
>
>    LaTeX export: use org-export-latex-hyperref-format

I have just reverted this commit.

- Carsten

>
>    * lisp/org-latex.el (org-export-latex-links) : Replaced hard coded
>    hyperref format with custom
>      variable `org-export-latex-hyperref-format'
>
> Note that href is not same as hyperref.
>
> Jambunthan K.
>
>
>> All the best,
>> Tom
>>
>> On Oct 28, 2010, at 3:30 PM, Jambunathan K wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Thomas
>>>
>>> There was a hint at possible solution (or atleast a partial
>>> solution) in
>>> my original post. Did you try it before jumping in to rough waters  
>>> or
>>> digging deeper?
>>>
>>> Do
>>>
>>> ,----
>>> | M-x customize-variable RET org-export-latex-hyperref-format'
>>> `----
>>>
>>> so that your .emacs has an entry like this
>>>
>>> ,---- [.emacs]
>>> |
>>> | (custom-set-variables
>>> |  '(org-export-latex-hyperref-format "\\hyperref[%s]{%s}"))
>>> |
>>> `----
>>>
>>> The above setting solves the problem for me with the following  
>>> simple
>>> Org file.
>>>
>>> * Heading1
>>> Make this section as large as possible so that it fills atleast a
>>> page.
>>>
>>> * Heading2
>>> Links to [[Heading1]]
>>>
>>> Jambunathan K.
>>>
>>> "Thomas S. Dye" <tsd@tsdye.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> On Oct 28, 2010, at 12:35 PM, Nick Dokos wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Thomas S. Dye <tsd@tsdye.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Oct 28, 2010, at 11:01 AM, Jambunathan K wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  This is a regression. release-7.01h is good. HEAD is bad. I get
>>>>>> the
>>>>>>  following line with release-7.01h.<
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   Links to \hyperref[sec-1]{Heading1}
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Jambunathan K.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Aloha Jambunathan K.,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Very many thanks for this information.  I have Org-mode version
>>>>>> 7.01trans
>>>>>> (release_7.01h.880.g7531f).  I take it the problem I'm having is
>>>>>> due to a relatively recent change
>>>>>> to Org-mode.  If there is anything I can do to help isolate the
>>>>>> problem, please let me know.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Tom,
>>>>>
>>>>> If you have the time and the inclination, you might try bisecting
>>>>> your
>>>>> way through. Bisecting org-mode problems is actually a very good  
>>>>> way
>>>>> to
>>>>> practice because the turnaround time is very small.
>>>>>
>>>>> Prerequisites:
>>>>>
>>>>> * you have a clone of the org-mode git repository.
>>>>>
>>>>> * you have an org test file.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Steps:
>>>>>
>>>>> * [optional, but it makes me feel a little safer] create a test
>>>>> branch
>>>>> and switch to it:
>>>>>
>>>>> git checkout -b test-branch master
>>>>>
>>>>> * I clean out all the compiled files while doing a bisection: it's
>>>>> quicker
>>>>> than regenerating them every time and I don't have to worry (much)
>>>>> about
>>>>> emacs loading a wayward .elc file:
>>>>>
>>>>> make clean
>>>>>
>>>>> * start the bisection and tell git which commit is known good and
>>>>> which is known bad:
>>>>>
>>>>> git bisect start
>>>>>
>>>>> # current version is bad
>>>>> git bisect bad
>>>>>
>>>>> # release_7.01h was good - I got the name with ``git tag''
>>>>> git bisect good release_7.01h
>>>>>
>>>>> That checks out a revision half-way in between the bad and good
>>>>> commits: since
>>>>> there are about 900 commits in between, you'll be at approx the  
>>>>> 450-
>>>>> mark and it
>>>>> should take about 10 bisections to get it down to a single commit.
>>>>>
>>>>> * LOOP Now all you have to do is repeat the following steps:
>>>>>
>>>>> # since you did ``make clean'' you don't have to worry about .elc
>>>>> files
>>>>> # just reload all the .el files.
>>>>> M-x org-reload
>>>>>
>>>>> visit your org test file, export to LaTeX, check for \href/
>>>>> \hyperref (or
>>>>> whatever other telltale sign shows badness/goodness).
>>>>>
>>>>> # tell git about it
>>>>> git bisect good *OR* git bisect bad
>>>>>
>>>>> This last step will check out another revision and in about 10
>>>>> repetitions
>>>>> of the loop, you are done.
>>>>>
>>>>> * Tell git you are done, so it can clean up:
>>>>>
>>>>> git bisect reset
>>>>>
>>>>> Theoretically, you could do all of this in your master branch
>>>>> without
>>>>> creating a test-branch and this last step will reset everything to
>>>>> the
>>>>> way it was before ``git start''.
>>>>>
>>>>> * Post the offending commit to the list.
>>>>>
>>>>> * Get back to your master branch:
>>>>>
>>>>> git checkout master
>>>>>
>>>>> * If you created a test-branch, clean it out:
>>>>>
>>>>> git branch -d test-branch
>>>>>
>>>>> * [Optional] Recreate your .elc files and reload them:
>>>>>
>>>>> make
>>>>> M-x org-reload
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> And that's it: a half-hour of fun and games. Unless of course, you
>>>>> hit upon a revision that is neither good nor bad (in the above
>>>>> restricted
>>>>> sense): you might get some other problem that prevents you from
>>>>> being
>>>>> able to answer. That might or might not be easy to resolve, so  
>>>>> I'll
>>>>> leave that as an advanced topic (truth be told, I came up against
>>>>> this
>>>>> situation a couple of days ago and I didn't know how to proceed:  
>>>>> so
>>>>> it's ignorance more than anything else that prevents me from  
>>>>> saying
>>>>> anything more).
>>>>>
>>>>> If you want to try, I'd be happy to answer questions - I might try
>>>>> the
>>>>> bisection later on tonight myself in any case. And btw, this is of
>>>>> course archeology of a different (and much easier) kind, so I
>>>>> imagine
>>>>> you'll take to it like a fish in water :-)
>>>>>
>>>>> HTH,
>>>>> Nick
>>>>
>>>> Hi Nick,
>>>>
>>>> Irresistible hook at the end there.  I wish this stuff were as easy
>>>> as
>>>> archaeology is for me.  Your instructions are terrific, though.
>>>>
>>>> I did hit on a revision that was neither good nor bad:
>>>>
>>>> commit 8562273b272024a630a582b0e1b94c481d8abeec
>>>> Author: Eric Schulte <schulte.eric@gmail.com>
>>>> Date:   Sat Oct 16 13:21:47 2010 -0600
>>>>
>>>>   ob-ref: don't forget arguments to referenced code blocks
>>>>
>>>>   * lisp/ob-ref.el (org-babel-ref-resolve): bringing the referent
>>>>     arguments back to their params before evaluation
>>>>
>>>> This one puts these lines in *Messages* when I export to LaTeX
>>>>
>>>> executing Org code block...
>>>> if: Symbol's value as variable is void: result-type
>>>>
>>>> I tried using different commits for the initial git bisect good,
>>>> hoping that would skip by the problem, but this one appears to have
>>>> stuck around a while.  My other two tries both ended with this same
>>>> error, but with different commits.
>>>>
>>>> I'm not sure what to do next.  This problem isn't yielding to my
>>>> archaeo-logic. :)
>>>>
>>>> All the best,
>>>> Tom
>
> _______________________________________________
> Emacs-orgmode mailing list
> Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
> Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode

Re: Internal links in LaTeX export

[Noorul Islam K M]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1498 bytes --]

Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com> writes:

> On Oct 29, 2010, at 5:22 AM, Jambunathan K wrote:
>
>> "Thomas S. Dye" <tsd@tsdye.com> writes:
>>
>>> Aloha Jambunathan K.,
>>>
>>> Yes, thanks for that suggestion.  It should work on your example, but
>>> it breaks external links, like this:
>>>
>>> \hyperref[http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/macros/latex/contrib/koma-script/
>>> ]{KOMA-script}
>>>
>>> External links require the \href{}{} command.  It appears the LaTeX
>>> export process no longer distinguishes internal and external links,
>>> as
>>> I believe it used to do.
>>>
>>
>> This is the problematic commit:
>>
>> commit f5918bdcc05d7924dc204b57307023eb1ef011f0
>> parent	df5894cdcb10819560f003c5b94b8f5f2b7d33cf
>> Date:   Sun Oct 17 08:29:51 2010 +0000
>>
>>    LaTeX export: use org-export-latex-hyperref-format
>
> I have just reverted this commit.
>
> - Carsten
>
Looks like time to change the variable name which is actually confusing.

Since href and hyperref are two different things, I renamed the existing
`org-export-latex-hyperref-format' variable as
`org-export-latex-href-format' and introduced a new one
`org-export-latex-hyperref-format'.

* org-latex.el (org-export-latex-hyperref-format): New option.
(org-export-latex-href-format): Renamed the existing variable
`org-export-latex-hyperref-format' as `org-export-latex-href-format'
(org-export-latex-links): Use `org-export-latex-hyperref-format' and 
`org-export-latex-href-format'

Thanks and Regards
Noorul


[-- Attachment #2: org-latex.el.txt --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 2010 bytes --]

diff --git a/lisp/org-latex.el b/lisp/org-latex.el
index cdc240c..8f0e0ea 100644
--- a/lisp/org-latex.el
+++ b/lisp/org-latex.el
@@ -295,7 +295,14 @@ markup defined, the first one in the association list will be used."
   :group 'org-export-latex
   :type 'string)
 
-(defcustom org-export-latex-hyperref-format "\\href{%s}{%s}"
+(defcustom org-export-latex-href-format "\\href{%s}{%s}"
+  "A printf format string to be applied to href links.
+The format must contain two %s instances.  The first will be filled with
+the link, the second with the link description."
+  :group 'org-export-latex
+  :type 'string)
+
+(defcustom org-export-latex-hyperref-format "\\hyperref[%s]{%s}"
   "A printf format string to be applied to hyperref links.
 The format must contain two %s instances.  The first will be filled with
 the link, the second with the link description."
@@ -2016,10 +2023,10 @@ The conversion is made depending of STRING-BEFORE and STRING-AFTER."
 	      (insert (format
 		       (org-export-get-coderef-format path desc)
 		       (cdr (assoc path org-export-code-refs)))))
-	     (radiop (insert (format "\\hyperref[%s]{%s}"
+	     (radiop (insert (format org-export-latex-hyperref-format
 				     (org-solidify-link-text raw-path) desc)))
 	     ((not type)
-	      (insert (format "\\hyperref[%s]{%s}"
+	      (insert (format org-export-latex-hyperref-format
 			      (org-remove-initial-hash
 			       (org-solidify-link-text raw-path))
 			      desc)))
@@ -2030,7 +2037,7 @@ The conversion is made depending of STRING-BEFORE and STRING-AFTER."
 		;; a LaTeX issue, but we here implement a work-around anyway.
 		(setq path (org-export-latex-protect-amp path)
 		      desc (org-export-latex-protect-amp desc)))
-	      (insert (format org-export-latex-hyperref-format path desc)))
+	      (insert (format org-export-latex-href-format path desc)))
 
 	     ((functionp (setq fnc (nth 2 (assoc type org-link-protocols))))
 	      ;; The link protocol has a function for formatting the link

[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 7178 bytes --]


>>
>>    * lisp/org-latex.el (org-export-latex-links) : Replaced hard coded
>>    hyperref format with custom
>>      variable `org-export-latex-hyperref-format'
>>
>> Note that href is not same as hyperref.
>>
>> Jambunthan K.
>>
>>
>>> All the best,
>>> Tom
>>>
>>> On Oct 28, 2010, at 3:30 PM, Jambunathan K wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thomas
>>>>
>>>> There was a hint at possible solution (or atleast a partial
>>>> solution) in
>>>> my original post. Did you try it before jumping in to rough waters
>>>> or
>>>> digging deeper?
>>>>
>>>> Do
>>>>
>>>> ,----
>>>> | M-x customize-variable RET org-export-latex-hyperref-format'
>>>> `----
>>>>
>>>> so that your .emacs has an entry like this
>>>>
>>>> ,---- [.emacs]
>>>> |
>>>> | (custom-set-variables
>>>> |  '(org-export-latex-hyperref-format "\\hyperref[%s]{%s}"))
>>>> |
>>>> `----
>>>>
>>>> The above setting solves the problem for me with the following
>>>> simple
>>>> Org file.
>>>>
>>>> * Heading1
>>>> Make this section as large as possible so that it fills atleast a
>>>> page.
>>>>
>>>> * Heading2
>>>> Links to [[Heading1]]
>>>>
>>>> Jambunathan K.
>>>>
>>>> "Thomas S. Dye" <tsd@tsdye.com> writes:
>>>>
>>>>> On Oct 28, 2010, at 12:35 PM, Nick Dokos wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Thomas S. Dye <tsd@tsdye.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Oct 28, 2010, at 11:01 AM, Jambunathan K wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  This is a regression. release-7.01h is good. HEAD is bad. I get
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>  following line with release-7.01h.<
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>   Links to \hyperref[sec-1]{Heading1}
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  Jambunathan K.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Aloha Jambunathan K.,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Very many thanks for this information.  I have Org-mode version
>>>>>>> 7.01trans
>>>>>>> (release_7.01h.880.g7531f).  I take it the problem I'm having is
>>>>>>> due to a relatively recent change
>>>>>>> to Org-mode.  If there is anything I can do to help isolate the
>>>>>>> problem, please let me know.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Tom,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you have the time and the inclination, you might try bisecting
>>>>>> your
>>>>>> way through. Bisecting org-mode problems is actually a very good
>>>>>> way
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> practice because the turnaround time is very small.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Prerequisites:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> * you have a clone of the org-mode git repository.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> * you have an org test file.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Steps:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> * [optional, but it makes me feel a little safer] create a test
>>>>>> branch
>>>>>> and switch to it:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> git checkout -b test-branch master
>>>>>>
>>>>>> * I clean out all the compiled files while doing a bisection: it's
>>>>>> quicker
>>>>>> than regenerating them every time and I don't have to worry (much)
>>>>>> about
>>>>>> emacs loading a wayward .elc file:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> make clean
>>>>>>
>>>>>> * start the bisection and tell git which commit is known good and
>>>>>> which is known bad:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> git bisect start
>>>>>>
>>>>>> # current version is bad
>>>>>> git bisect bad
>>>>>>
>>>>>> # release_7.01h was good - I got the name with ``git tag''
>>>>>> git bisect good release_7.01h
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That checks out a revision half-way in between the bad and good
>>>>>> commits: since
>>>>>> there are about 900 commits in between, you'll be at approx the
>>>>>> 450-
>>>>>> mark and it
>>>>>> should take about 10 bisections to get it down to a single commit.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> * LOOP Now all you have to do is repeat the following steps:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> # since you did ``make clean'' you don't have to worry about .elc
>>>>>> files
>>>>>> # just reload all the .el files.
>>>>>> M-x org-reload
>>>>>>
>>>>>> visit your org test file, export to LaTeX, check for \href/
>>>>>> \hyperref (or
>>>>>> whatever other telltale sign shows badness/goodness).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> # tell git about it
>>>>>> git bisect good *OR* git bisect bad
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This last step will check out another revision and in about 10
>>>>>> repetitions
>>>>>> of the loop, you are done.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> * Tell git you are done, so it can clean up:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> git bisect reset
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Theoretically, you could do all of this in your master branch
>>>>>> without
>>>>>> creating a test-branch and this last step will reset everything to
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> way it was before ``git start''.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> * Post the offending commit to the list.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> * Get back to your master branch:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> git checkout master
>>>>>>
>>>>>> * If you created a test-branch, clean it out:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> git branch -d test-branch
>>>>>>
>>>>>> * [Optional] Recreate your .elc files and reload them:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> make
>>>>>> M-x org-reload
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And that's it: a half-hour of fun and games. Unless of course, you
>>>>>> hit upon a revision that is neither good nor bad (in the above
>>>>>> restricted
>>>>>> sense): you might get some other problem that prevents you from
>>>>>> being
>>>>>> able to answer. That might or might not be easy to resolve, so
>>>>>> I'll
>>>>>> leave that as an advanced topic (truth be told, I came up against
>>>>>> this
>>>>>> situation a couple of days ago and I didn't know how to proceed:
>>>>>> so
>>>>>> it's ignorance more than anything else that prevents me from
>>>>>> saying
>>>>>> anything more).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you want to try, I'd be happy to answer questions - I might try
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> bisection later on tonight myself in any case. And btw, this is of
>>>>>> course archeology of a different (and much easier) kind, so I
>>>>>> imagine
>>>>>> you'll take to it like a fish in water :-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> HTH,
>>>>>> Nick
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Nick,
>>>>>
>>>>> Irresistible hook at the end there.  I wish this stuff were as easy
>>>>> as
>>>>> archaeology is for me.  Your instructions are terrific, though.
>>>>>
>>>>> I did hit on a revision that was neither good nor bad:
>>>>>
>>>>> commit 8562273b272024a630a582b0e1b94c481d8abeec
>>>>> Author: Eric Schulte <schulte.eric@gmail.com>
>>>>> Date:   Sat Oct 16 13:21:47 2010 -0600
>>>>>
>>>>>   ob-ref: don't forget arguments to referenced code blocks
>>>>>
>>>>>   * lisp/ob-ref.el (org-babel-ref-resolve): bringing the referent
>>>>>     arguments back to their params before evaluation
>>>>>
>>>>> This one puts these lines in *Messages* when I export to LaTeX
>>>>>
>>>>> executing Org code block...
>>>>> if: Symbol's value as variable is void: result-type
>>>>>
>>>>> I tried using different commits for the initial git bisect good,
>>>>> hoping that would skip by the problem, but this one appears to have
>>>>> stuck around a while.  My other two tries both ended with this same
>>>>> error, but with different commits.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm not sure what to do next.  This problem isn't yielding to my
>>>>> archaeo-logic. :)
>>>>>
>>>>> All the best,
>>>>> Tom
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Emacs-orgmode mailing list
>> Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
>> Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
>> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Emacs-orgmode mailing list
> Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
> Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode

[-- Attachment #4: Type: text/plain, Size: 201 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode

Re: Re: Internal links in LaTeX export

[Nick Dokos]

Nick Dokos <nicholas.dokos@hp.com> wrote:

> Thomas S. Dye <tsd@tsdye.com> wrote:
> 
> > ...
> > I did hit on a revision that was neither good nor bad:
> > 
> > commit 8562273b272024a630a582b0e1b94c481d8abeec
> > Author: Eric Schulte <schulte.eric@gmail.com>
> > Date:   Sat Oct 16 13:21:47 2010 -0600
> > 
> >     ob-ref: don't forget arguments to referenced code blocks
> > 
> >     * lisp/ob-ref.el (org-babel-ref-resolve): bringing the referent
> >       arguments back to their params before evaluation
> > 
> > This one puts these lines in *Messages* when I export to LaTeX
> > 
> > executing Org code block...
> > if: Symbol's value as variable is void: result-type
> > 
> 
> Yeah, that was the error that stopped me cold as well, although I hit it

In case it wasn't clear, that was a couple of days ago on a different
bisection, while chasing another problem.

> on a different commit (I think) - there must be a way to get around the
> problem but it certainly makes things more difficult.  I imagine the way
> to go is to find a commit before this error was introduced and a commit
> after it was fixed and try those with your problem: it might allow you
> to bypass the problematic range (in which case, you might be able to
> continue bisecting all the way to the end), or it might limit the bad
> commit to this range - the latter is still valuable to know but
> certainly not as definitive as "this is the bad commit".  And in any
> case, all of this would fall into the "advanced" appendix in the git
> bisection book.
> 
> Sorry it didn't pan out but I hope that you had fun digging,
> 

In this instance, I actually bisected it down to the bad commit that
Jambunathan K. identified (and Carsten reverted). I guess I was lucky
in the sense that I pulled a couple of days ago, so HEAD was 851
commits ahead of 7.01h and the bisection proceeded as follows:

release_7.01h-851-gfd9e933 - bad
release_7.01h              - good
release_7.01h-425-gfea9072 - good
release_7.01h-638-gd9e4469 - good
release_7.01h-744-g3d2aec3 - bad   <<<<<<
release_7.01h-691-g6b9782d - good
release_7.01h-717-gc9bb51e - bad
release_7.01h-704-g935c310 - good
release_7.01h-710-gc9b0176 - good
release_7.01h-713-g8820a25 - good
release_7.01h-715-gf5918bd - bad
release_7.01h-714-gdf5894c - good

and it identified release_7.01h-715-gf5918bd as the first bad
commit. From the previous investigation, I know that the result-type
error that you ran into, was introduced after commit 750 and resolved
before commit 800 (using release_7.01h as the origin), so once I got to
the <<<< point above, I was safe: I couldn't possibly end up in the
problematic range.  OTOH, if you start from say 810, the sequence would
be 405, 608, 709, 759 (or so) and you end up in the problematic range,
which is probably what happened to you.

BTW, I got the bisection sequence (after the fact) with

     git bisect log

and then translated the (40-hex digit SHA1 form) commits to the more
readable form above using

     git describe <commit>

This is all 20/20 hindsight of course, but I hope interesting
enough as a curiosity.

Nick

Re: Re: Internal links in LaTeX export

[Tom Dye]

Many thanks to all of you for figuring this out and fixing it.  I can  
confirm that internal and external links both work in the pdf file  
compiled from the Org-mode LaTeX export, which is way cool and seems  
miraculous to a dirt archaeologist.

All the best,
Tom

On Oct 28, 2010, at 7:01 PM, Noorul Islam K M wrote:

> Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> On Oct 29, 2010, at 5:22 AM, Jambunathan K wrote:
>>
>>> "Thomas S. Dye" <tsd@tsdye.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> Aloha Jambunathan K.,
>>>>
>>>> Yes, thanks for that suggestion.  It should work on your example,  
>>>> but
>>>> it breaks external links, like this:
>>>>
>>>> \hyperref[http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/macros/latex/contrib/koma-script/
>>>> ]{KOMA-script}
>>>>
>>>> External links require the \href{}{} command.  It appears the LaTeX
>>>> export process no longer distinguishes internal and external links,
>>>> as
>>>> I believe it used to do.
>>>>
>>>
>>> This is the problematic commit:
>>>
>>> commit f5918bdcc05d7924dc204b57307023eb1ef011f0
>>> parent	df5894cdcb10819560f003c5b94b8f5f2b7d33cf
>>> Date:   Sun Oct 17 08:29:51 2010 +0000
>>>
>>> LaTeX export: use org-export-latex-hyperref-format
>>
>> I have just reverted this commit.
>>
>> - Carsten
>>
> Looks like time to change the variable name which is actually  
> confusing.
>
> Since href and hyperref are two different things, I renamed the  
> existing
> `org-export-latex-hyperref-format' variable as
> `org-export-latex-href-format' and introduced a new one
> `org-export-latex-hyperref-format'.
>
> * org-latex.el (org-export-latex-hyperref-format): New option.
> (org-export-latex-href-format): Renamed the existing variable
> `org-export-latex-hyperref-format' as `org-export-latex-href-format'
> (org-export-latex-links): Use `org-export-latex-hyperref-format' and
> `org-export-latex-href-format'
>
> Thanks and Regards
> Noorul
>
> diff --git a/lisp/org-latex.el b/lisp/org-latex.el
> index cdc240c..8f0e0ea 100644
> --- a/lisp/org-latex.el
> +++ b/lisp/org-latex.el
> @@ -295,7 +295,14 @@ markup defined, the first one in the  
> association list will be used."
> :group 'org-export-latex
> :type 'string)
>
> -(defcustom org-export-latex-hyperref-format "\\href{%s}{%s}"
> +(defcustom org-export-latex-href-format "\\href{%s}{%s}"
> +  "A printf format string to be applied to href links.
> +The format must contain two %s instances.  The first will be filled  
> with
> +the link, the second with the link description."
> +  :group 'org-export-latex
> +  :type 'string)
> +
> +(defcustom org-export-latex-hyperref-format "\\hyperref[%s]{%s}"
> "A printf format string to be applied to hyperref links.
> The format must contain two %s instances.  The first will be filled  
> with
> the link, the second with the link description."
> @@ -2016,10 +2023,10 @@ The conversion is made depending of STRING- 
> BEFORE and STRING-AFTER."
> 	      (insert (format
> 		       (org-export-get-coderef-format path desc)
> 		       (cdr (assoc path org-export-code-refs)))))
> -	     (radiop (insert (format "\\hyperref[%s]{%s}"
> +	     (radiop (insert (format org-export-latex-hyperref-format
> 				     (org-solidify-link-text raw-path) desc)))
> 	     ((not type)
> -	      (insert (format "\\hyperref[%s]{%s}"
> +	      (insert (format org-export-latex-hyperref-format
> 			      (org-remove-initial-hash
> 			       (org-solidify-link-text raw-path))
> 			      desc)))
> @@ -2030,7 +2037,7 @@ The conversion is made depending of STRING- 
> BEFORE and STRING-AFTER."
> 		;; a LaTeX issue, but we here implement a work-around anyway.
> 		(setq path (org-export-latex-protect-amp path)
> 		      desc (org-export-latex-protect-amp desc)))
> -	      (insert (format org-export-latex-hyperref-format path desc)))
> +	      (insert (format org-export-latex-href-format path desc)))
>
> 	     ((functionp (setq fnc (nth 2 (assoc type org-link-protocols))))
> 	      ;; The link protocol has a function for formatting the link
>
>>>
>>> * lisp/org-latex.el (org-export-latex-links) : Replaced hard coded
>>> hyperref format with custom
>>> variable `org-export-latex-hyperref-format'
>>>
>>> Note that href is not same as hyperref.
>>>
>>> Jambunthan K.
>>>
>>>
>>>> All the best,
>>>> Tom
>>>>
>>>> On Oct 28, 2010, at 3:30 PM, Jambunathan K wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thomas
>>>>>
>>>>> There was a hint at possible solution (or atleast a partial
>>>>> solution) in
>>>>> my original post. Did you try it before jumping in to rough waters
>>>>> or
>>>>> digging deeper?
>>>>>
>>>>> Do
>>>>>
>>>>> ,----
>>>>> | M-x customize-variable RET org-export-latex-hyperref-format'
>>>>> `----
>>>>>
>>>>> so that your .emacs has an entry like this
>>>>>
>>>>> ,---- [.emacs]
>>>>> |
>>>>> | (custom-set-variables
>>>>> |  '(org-export-latex-hyperref-format "\\hyperref[%s]{%s}"))
>>>>> |
>>>>> `----
>>>>>
>>>>> The above setting solves the problem for me with the following
>>>>> simple
>>>>> Org file.
>>>>>
>>>>> * Heading1
>>>>> Make this section as large as possible so that it fills atleast a
>>>>> page.
>>>>>
>>>>> * Heading2
>>>>> Links to [[Heading1]]
>>>>>
>>>>> Jambunathan K.
>>>>>
>>>>> "Thomas S. Dye" <tsd@tsdye.com> writes:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Oct 28, 2010, at 12:35 PM, Nick Dokos wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thomas S. Dye <tsd@tsdye.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Oct 28, 2010, at 11:01 AM, Jambunathan K wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This is a regression. release-7.01h is good. HEAD is bad. I get
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> following line with release-7.01h.<
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Links to \hyperref[sec-1]{Heading1}
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Jambunathan K.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Aloha Jambunathan K.,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Very many thanks for this information.  I have Org-mode version
>>>>>>>> 7.01trans
>>>>>>>> (release_7.01h.880.g7531f).  I take it the problem I'm having  
>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>> due to a relatively recent change
>>>>>>>> to Org-mode.  If there is anything I can do to help isolate the
>>>>>>>> problem, please let me know.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Tom,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If you have the time and the inclination, you might try  
>>>>>>> bisecting
>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>> way through. Bisecting org-mode problems is actually a very good
>>>>>>> way
>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>> practice because the turnaround time is very small.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Prerequisites:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> * you have a clone of the org-mode git repository.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> * you have an org test file.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Steps:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> * [optional, but it makes me feel a little safer] create a test
>>>>>>> branch
>>>>>>> and switch to it:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> git checkout -b test-branch master
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> * I clean out all the compiled files while doing a bisection:  
>>>>>>> it's
>>>>>>> quicker
>>>>>>> than regenerating them every time and I don't have to worry  
>>>>>>> (much)
>>>>>>> about
>>>>>>> emacs loading a wayward .elc file:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> make clean
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> * start the bisection and tell git which commit is known good  
>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>> which is known bad:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> git bisect start
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> # current version is bad
>>>>>>> git bisect bad
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> # release_7.01h was good - I got the name with ``git tag''
>>>>>>> git bisect good release_7.01h
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That checks out a revision half-way in between the bad and good
>>>>>>> commits: since
>>>>>>> there are about 900 commits in between, you'll be at approx the
>>>>>>> 450-
>>>>>>> mark and it
>>>>>>> should take about 10 bisections to get it down to a single  
>>>>>>> commit.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> * LOOP Now all you have to do is repeat the following steps:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> # since you did ``make clean'' you don't have to worry  
>>>>>>> about .elc
>>>>>>> files
>>>>>>> # just reload all the .el files.
>>>>>>> M-x org-reload
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> visit your org test file, export to LaTeX, check for \href/
>>>>>>> \hyperref (or
>>>>>>> whatever other telltale sign shows badness/goodness).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> # tell git about it
>>>>>>> git bisect good *OR* git bisect bad
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This last step will check out another revision and in about 10
>>>>>>> repetitions
>>>>>>> of the loop, you are done.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> * Tell git you are done, so it can clean up:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> git bisect reset
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Theoretically, you could do all of this in your master branch
>>>>>>> without
>>>>>>> creating a test-branch and this last step will reset  
>>>>>>> everything to
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> way it was before ``git start''.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> * Post the offending commit to the list.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> * Get back to your master branch:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> git checkout master
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> * If you created a test-branch, clean it out:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> git branch -d test-branch
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> * [Optional] Recreate your .elc files and reload them:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> make
>>>>>>> M-x org-reload
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And that's it: a half-hour of fun and games. Unless of course,  
>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>> hit upon a revision that is neither good nor bad (in the above
>>>>>>> restricted
>>>>>>> sense): you might get some other problem that prevents you from
>>>>>>> being
>>>>>>> able to answer. That might or might not be easy to resolve, so
>>>>>>> I'll
>>>>>>> leave that as an advanced topic (truth be told, I came up  
>>>>>>> against
>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>> situation a couple of days ago and I didn't know how to proceed:
>>>>>>> so
>>>>>>> it's ignorance more than anything else that prevents me from
>>>>>>> saying
>>>>>>> anything more).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If you want to try, I'd be happy to answer questions - I might  
>>>>>>> try
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> bisection later on tonight myself in any case. And btw, this  
>>>>>>> is of
>>>>>>> course archeology of a different (and much easier) kind, so I
>>>>>>> imagine
>>>>>>> you'll take to it like a fish in water :-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> HTH,
>>>>>>> Nick
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Nick,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Irresistible hook at the end there.  I wish this stuff were as  
>>>>>> easy
>>>>>> as
>>>>>> archaeology is for me.  Your instructions are terrific, though.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I did hit on a revision that was neither good nor bad:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> commit 8562273b272024a630a582b0e1b94c481d8abeec
>>>>>> Author: Eric Schulte <schulte.eric@gmail.com>
>>>>>> Date:   Sat Oct 16 13:21:47 2010 -0600
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ob-ref: don't forget arguments to referenced code blocks
>>>>>>
>>>>>> * lisp/ob-ref.el (org-babel-ref-resolve): bringing the referent
>>>>>> arguments back to their params before evaluation
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This one puts these lines in *Messages* when I export to LaTeX
>>>>>>
>>>>>> executing Org code block...
>>>>>> if: Symbol's value as variable is void: result-type
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I tried using different commits for the initial git bisect good,
>>>>>> hoping that would skip by the problem, but this one appears to  
>>>>>> have
>>>>>> stuck around a while.  My other two tries both ended with this  
>>>>>> same
>>>>>> error, but with different commits.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm not sure what to do next.  This problem isn't yielding to my
>>>>>> archaeo-logic. :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> All the best,
>>>>>> Tom
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Emacs-orgmode mailing list
>>> Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
>>> Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
>>> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Emacs-orgmode mailing list
>> Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
>> Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
>> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
> _______________________________________________
> Emacs-orgmode mailing list
> Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
> Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode

Re: Re: Internal links in LaTeX export

[Nick Dokos]

Noorul Islam K M <noorul@noorul.com> wrote:

> Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com> writes:
> 
> > On Oct 29, 2010, at 5:22 AM, Jambunathan K wrote:
> >
> >> "Thomas S. Dye" <tsd@tsdye.com> writes:
> >>
> >>> Aloha Jambunathan K.,
> >>>
> >>> Yes, thanks for that suggestion.  It should work on your example, but
> >>> it breaks external links, like this:
> >>>
> >>> \hyperref[http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/macros/latex/contrib/koma-script/
> >>> ]{KOMA-script}
> >>>
> >>> External links require the \href{}{} command.  It appears the LaTeX
> >>> export process no longer distinguishes internal and external links,
> >>> as
> >>> I believe it used to do.
> >>>
> >>
> >> This is the problematic commit:
> >>
> >> commit f5918bdcc05d7924dc204b57307023eb1ef011f0
> >> parent	df5894cdcb10819560f003c5b94b8f5f2b7d33cf
> >> Date:   Sun Oct 17 08:29:51 2010 +0000
> >>
> >>    LaTeX export: use org-export-latex-hyperref-format
> >
> > I have just reverted this commit.
> >
> > - Carsten
> >
> Looks like time to change the variable name which is actually confusing.
> 
> Since href and hyperref are two different things, I renamed the existing
> `org-export-latex-hyperref-format' variable as
> `org-export-latex-href-format' and introduced a new one
> `org-export-latex-hyperref-format'.
> 
> * org-latex.el (org-export-latex-hyperref-format): New option.
> (org-export-latex-href-format): Renamed the existing variable
> `org-export-latex-hyperref-format' as `org-export-latex-href-format'
> (org-export-latex-links): Use `org-export-latex-hyperref-format' and 
> `org-export-latex-href-format'
> 
> Thanks and Regards
> Noorul
> 
> diff --git a/lisp/org-latex.el b/lisp/org-latex.el
> index cdc240c..8f0e0ea 100644
> --- a/lisp/org-latex.el
> +++ b/lisp/org-latex.el
> @@ -295,7 +295,14 @@ markup defined, the first one in the association list will be used."
>    :group 'org-export-latex
>    :type 'string)
>  
> -(defcustom org-export-latex-hyperref-format "\\href{%s}{%s}"
> +(defcustom org-export-latex-href-format "\\href{%s}{%s}"
> +  "A printf format string to be applied to href links.
> +The format must contain two %s instances.  The first will be filled with
> +the link, the second with the link description."
> +  :group 'org-export-latex
> +  :type 'string)
> +
> +(defcustom org-export-latex-hyperref-format "\\hyperref[%s]{%s}"
>    "A printf format string to be applied to hyperref links.
>  The format must contain two %s instances.  The first will be filled with
>  the link, the second with the link description."
> @@ -2016,10 +2023,10 @@ The conversion is made depending of STRING-BEFORE and STRING-AFTER."
>  	      (insert (format
>  		       (org-export-get-coderef-format path desc)
>  		       (cdr (assoc path org-export-code-refs)))))
> -	     (radiop (insert (format "\\hyperref[%s]{%s}"
> +	     (radiop (insert (format org-export-latex-hyperref-format
>  				     (org-solidify-link-text raw-path) desc)))
>  	     ((not type)
> -	      (insert (format "\\hyperref[%s]{%s}"
> +	      (insert (format org-export-latex-hyperref-format
>  			      (org-remove-initial-hash
>  			       (org-solidify-link-text raw-path))
>  			      desc)))
> @@ -2030,7 +2037,7 @@ The conversion is made depending of STRING-BEFORE and STRING-AFTER."
>  		;; a LaTeX issue, but we here implement a work-around anyway.
>  		(setq path (org-export-latex-protect-amp path)
>  		      desc (org-export-latex-protect-amp desc)))
> -	      (insert (format org-export-latex-hyperref-format path desc)))
> +	      (insert (format org-export-latex-href-format path desc)))
>  
>  	     ((functionp (setq fnc (nth 2 (assoc type org-link-protocols))))
>  	      ;; The link protocol has a function for formatting the link
> 

I don't think this patch is correct. I just pulled "Org-mode version
7.01trans (release_7.01h.882.g750f.dirty)" to get Carsten's revert of
the previous patch and tested against the following org file:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---

* Foo
Here is a link to section Bar: [[Bar]]

* Bar

And here is an external link: [[http://www.google.com][google]]
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

When I export to LaTeX, I get this:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
...
\section{Foo}
\label{sec-1}

Here is a link to section Bar: \hyperref[sec-2]{Bar}
\section{Bar}
\label{sec-2}


And here is an external link: \href{http://www.google.com}{google}
...
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

which I believe is correct - Tom?

After I apply the patch, I get this LaTeX output:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
...
\section{Foo}
\label{sec-1}

Here is a link to section Bar: \href{sec-2}{Bar}
\section{Bar}
\label{sec-2}


And here is an external link: \href{http://www.google.com}{google}
...
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

which is wrong. Did you test the patch and if so, how?

Nick

Re: Re: Internal links in LaTeX export

[Noorul Islam]

On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 12:50 PM, Nick Dokos <nicholas.dokos@hp.com> wrote:
> Noorul Islam K M <noorul@noorul.com> wrote:
>
>> Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>> > On Oct 29, 2010, at 5:22 AM, Jambunathan K wrote:
>> >
>> >> "Thomas S. Dye" <tsd@tsdye.com> writes:
>> >>
>> >>> Aloha Jambunathan K.,
>> >>>
>> >>> Yes, thanks for that suggestion.  It should work on your example, but
>> >>> it breaks external links, like this:
>> >>>
>> >>> \hyperref[http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/macros/latex/contrib/koma-script/
>> >>> ]{KOMA-script}
>> >>>
>> >>> External links require the \href{}{} command.  It appears the LaTeX
>> >>> export process no longer distinguishes internal and external links,
>> >>> as
>> >>> I believe it used to do.
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> This is the problematic commit:
>> >>
>> >> commit f5918bdcc05d7924dc204b57307023eb1ef011f0
>> >> parent     df5894cdcb10819560f003c5b94b8f5f2b7d33cf
>> >> Date:   Sun Oct 17 08:29:51 2010 +0000
>> >>
>> >>    LaTeX export: use org-export-latex-hyperref-format
>> >
>> > I have just reverted this commit.
>> >
>> > - Carsten
>> >
>> Looks like time to change the variable name which is actually confusing.
>>
>> Since href and hyperref are two different things, I renamed the existing
>> `org-export-latex-hyperref-format' variable as
>> `org-export-latex-href-format' and introduced a new one
>> `org-export-latex-hyperref-format'.
>>
>> * org-latex.el (org-export-latex-hyperref-format): New option.
>> (org-export-latex-href-format): Renamed the existing variable
>> `org-export-latex-hyperref-format' as `org-export-latex-href-format'
>> (org-export-latex-links): Use `org-export-latex-hyperref-format' and
>> `org-export-latex-href-format'
>>
>> Thanks and Regards
>> Noorul
>>
>> diff --git a/lisp/org-latex.el b/lisp/org-latex.el
>> index cdc240c..8f0e0ea 100644
>> --- a/lisp/org-latex.el
>> +++ b/lisp/org-latex.el
>> @@ -295,7 +295,14 @@ markup defined, the first one in the association list will be used."
>>    :group 'org-export-latex
>>    :type 'string)
>>
>> -(defcustom org-export-latex-hyperref-format "\\href{%s}{%s}"
>> +(defcustom org-export-latex-href-format "\\href{%s}{%s}"
>> +  "A printf format string to be applied to href links.
>> +The format must contain two %s instances.  The first will be filled with
>> +the link, the second with the link description."
>> +  :group 'org-export-latex
>> +  :type 'string)
>> +
>> +(defcustom org-export-latex-hyperref-format "\\hyperref[%s]{%s}"
>>    "A printf format string to be applied to hyperref links.
>>  The format must contain two %s instances.  The first will be filled with
>>  the link, the second with the link description."
>> @@ -2016,10 +2023,10 @@ The conversion is made depending of STRING-BEFORE and STRING-AFTER."
>>             (insert (format
>>                      (org-export-get-coderef-format path desc)
>>                      (cdr (assoc path org-export-code-refs)))))
>> -          (radiop (insert (format "\\hyperref[%s]{%s}"
>> +          (radiop (insert (format org-export-latex-hyperref-format
>>                                    (org-solidify-link-text raw-path) desc)))
>>            ((not type)
>> -           (insert (format "\\hyperref[%s]{%s}"
>> +           (insert (format org-export-latex-hyperref-format
>>                             (org-remove-initial-hash
>>                              (org-solidify-link-text raw-path))
>>                             desc)))
>> @@ -2030,7 +2037,7 @@ The conversion is made depending of STRING-BEFORE and STRING-AFTER."
>>               ;; a LaTeX issue, but we here implement a work-around anyway.
>>               (setq path (org-export-latex-protect-amp path)
>>                     desc (org-export-latex-protect-amp desc)))
>> -           (insert (format org-export-latex-hyperref-format path desc)))
>> +           (insert (format org-export-latex-href-format path desc)))
>>
>>            ((functionp (setq fnc (nth 2 (assoc type org-link-protocols))))
>>             ;; The link protocol has a function for formatting the link
>>
>
> I don't think this patch is correct. I just pulled "Org-mode version
> 7.01trans (release_7.01h.882.g750f.dirty)" to get Carsten's revert of
> the previous patch and tested against the following org file:
>
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
>
> * Foo
> Here is a link to section Bar: [[Bar]]
>
> * Bar
>
> And here is an external link: [[http://www.google.com][google]]
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>
> When I export to LaTeX, I get this:
>
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> ...
> \section{Foo}
> \label{sec-1}
>
> Here is a link to section Bar: \hyperref[sec-2]{Bar}
> \section{Bar}
> \label{sec-2}
>
>
> And here is an external link: \href{http://www.google.com}{google}
> ...
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>
> which I believe is correct - Tom?
>
> After I apply the patch, I get this LaTeX output:
>
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> ...
> \section{Foo}
> \label{sec-1}
>
> Here is a link to section Bar: \href{sec-2}{Bar}
> \section{Bar}
> \label{sec-2}
>
>
> And here is an external link: \href{http://www.google.com}{google}
> ...
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>
> which is wrong. Did you test the patch and if so, how?
>

For the same thing I get this

--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--

\section{Foo}
\label{sec-1}

Here is a link to section Bar: \hyperref[sec-2]{Bar}
\section{Bar}
\label{sec-2}


And here is an external link: \href{http://www.google.com}{google}

--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--

Thanks and Regards
Noorul

Re: Re: Internal links in LaTeX export

[Nick Dokos]

Noorul Islam <noorul@noorul.com> wrote:

> 
> For the same thing I get this
> 
> 
> \section{Foo}
> \label{sec-1}
> 
> Here is a link to section Bar: \hyperref[sec-2]{Bar}
> \section{Bar}
> \label{sec-2}
> 
> 
> And here is an external link: \href{http://www.google.com}{google}
> 
> 

You are right and I'm wrong: M-x org-reload just won't cut it in this
case: changed defvars/defcustoms do not change values. And BTW, that's
also a flaw in my earlier description of git bisect: org-reload is not
enough in general - a new emacs needs to be started to pick up these
changes. Time to get some sleep.

Sorry for the noise,
Nick

Re: Re: Internal links in LaTeX export

[Jambunathan K]

Nick

I hunted down the bug with heuristics.

Speaking of bisections,

> In this instance, I actually bisected it down to the bad commit that
> Jambunathan K. identified (and Carsten reverted). I guess I was lucky
> in the sense that I pulled a couple of days ago, so HEAD was 851
> commits ahead of 7.01h and the bisection proceeded as follows:
>
> release_7.01h-851-gfd9e933 - bad
> release_7.01h              - good
> release_7.01h-425-gfea9072 - good
> release_7.01h-638-gd9e4469 - good
> release_7.01h-744-g3d2aec3 - bad   <<<<<<
> release_7.01h-691-g6b9782d - good
> release_7.01h-717-gc9bb51e - bad
> release_7.01h-704-g935c310 - good
> release_7.01h-710-gc9b0176 - good
> release_7.01h-713-g8820a25 - good
> release_7.01h-715-gf5918bd - bad
> release_7.01h-714-gdf5894c - good
>
> and it identified release_7.01h-715-gf5918bd as the first bad
> commit. From the previous investigation, I know that the result-type
> error that you ran into, was introduced after commit 750 and resolved
> before commit 800 (using release_7.01h as the origin), so once I got to
> the <<<< point above, I was safe: I couldn't possibly end up in the
> problematic range.  OTOH, if you start from say 810, the sequence would
> be 405, 608, 709, 759 (or so) and you end up in the problematic range,
> which is probably what happened to you.
>
> BTW, I got the bisection sequence (after the fact) with
>
>      git bisect log
>
> and then translated the (40-hex digit SHA1 form) commits to the more
> readable form above using
>
>      git describe <commit>
>

Git bisection is wonderful. It is a bit of drag nevertheless - Tag,
Test, Tag, Test Tag, Test .... Ah, finally done (or undecided)

In the case at hand, it is clear that the issue is with either
org-latex.el (or org-exp.el). It is most likely the former because the
bug description is backend-specific.

I wish there was a way to say this:

- "do bisection on the revisions where org-latex.el changed (as opposed
   to revisions where HEAD moved)"

The candidate commits then would have reduced to 30 odd commits rather
than 851 that one had to contend with.

Hypothetically speaking, even this improved bisection would have left me
confused at somepoint because of the churn 'pdflatex & texi2dvi' churn
that pdf export process went through in recent times.

Jambunathan K.

> This is all 20/20 hindsight of course, but I hope interesting
> enough as a curiosity.
>
> Nick

Re: Re: Internal links in LaTeX export

[suvayu ali]

Hi Jambunathan

On 29 October 2010 03:17, Jambunathan K <kjambunathan@gmail.com> wrote:
> wish there was a way to say this:
>
> - "do bisection on the revisions where org-latex.el changed (as opposed
>   to revisions where HEAD moved)"
>
> The candidate commits then would have reduced to 30 odd commits rather
> than 851 that one had to contend with.
>

I see in `man git-bisect' a form like this is shown as valid,

git bisect start [<bad> [<good>...]] [--] [<paths>...]

Wouldn't that do the job?

PS: I haven't tried this, just referring to the docs.

-- 
Suvayu

Open source is the future. It sets us free.

Re: Re: Internal links in LaTeX export

[Jambunathan K]

suvayu ali <fatkasuvayu+linux@gmail.com> writes:

> Hi Jambunathan
>
> On 29 October 2010 03:17, Jambunathan K <kjambunathan@gmail.com> wrote:
>> wish there was a way to say this:
>>
>> - "do bisection on the revisions where org-latex.el changed (as opposed
>>   to revisions where HEAD moved)"
>>
>> The candidate commits then would have reduced to 30 odd commits rather
>> than 851 that one had to contend with.
>>
>
> I see in `man git-bisect' a form like this is shown as valid,
>
> git bisect start [<bad> [<good>...]] [--] [<paths>...]
>
> Wouldn't that do the job?
>

Indeed. One more tools in the armour.

,---- [Example from Git Bisect Manual]
| Cutting down bisection by giving more parameters to bisect start
| 
| You can further cut down the number of trials, if you know what
| part of the tree is involved in the problem you are tracking
| down, by specifying path parameters when issuing the bisect start
| command:
| 
| $ git bisect start -- arch/i386 include/asm-i386
`----

Jambunathan K.

[Accepted] Re: Internal links in LaTeX export

[Carsten Dominik]

Patch 349 (http://patchwork.newartisans.com/patch/349/) is now "Accepted".

Maintainer comment: No comment

This relates to the following submission:

http://mid.gmane.org/%3C871v79h9t3.fsf%40noorul.maa.corp.collab.net%3E

Here is the original message containing the patch:

> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Subject: [Orgmode] Re: Internal links in LaTeX export
> Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 10:01:12 -0000
> From: Noorul Islam <noorul@noorul.com>
> X-Patchwork-Id: 349
> Message-Id: <871v79h9t3.fsf@noorul.maa.corp.collab.net>
> To: Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com>
> Cc: =?utf-8?Q?S=C3=A9bastien?=@gnu.org, Vauban <wxhgmqzgwmuf@spammotel.com>, 
> 	nicholas.dokos@hp.com, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org,
> 	Jambunathan K <kjambunathan@gmail.com>
> 
> Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com> writes:
> 
> > On Oct 29, 2010, at 5:22 AM, Jambunathan K wrote:
> >
> >> "Thomas S. Dye" <tsd@tsdye.com> writes:
> >>
> >>> Aloha Jambunathan K.,
> >>>
> >>> Yes, thanks for that suggestion.  It should work on your example, but
> >>> it breaks external links, like this:
> >>>
> >>> \hyperref[http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/macros/latex/contrib/koma-script/
> >>> ]{KOMA-script}
> >>>
> >>> External links require the \href{}{} command.  It appears the LaTeX
> >>> export process no longer distinguishes internal and external links,
> >>> as
> >>> I believe it used to do.
> >>>
> >>
> >> This is the problematic commit:
> >>
> >> commit f5918bdcc05d7924dc204b57307023eb1ef011f0
> >> parent	df5894cdcb10819560f003c5b94b8f5f2b7d33cf
> >> Date:   Sun Oct 17 08:29:51 2010 +0000
> >>
> >>    LaTeX export: use org-export-latex-hyperref-format
> >
> > I have just reverted this commit.
> >
> > - Carsten
> >
> Looks like time to change the variable name which is actually confusing.
> 
> Since href and hyperref are two different things, I renamed the existing
> `org-export-latex-hyperref-format' variable as
> `org-export-latex-href-format' and introduced a new one
> `org-export-latex-hyperref-format'.
> 
> * org-latex.el (org-export-latex-hyperref-format): New option.
> (org-export-latex-href-format): Renamed the existing variable
> `org-export-latex-hyperref-format' as `org-export-latex-href-format'
> (org-export-latex-links): Use `org-export-latex-hyperref-format' and 
> `org-export-latex-href-format'
> 
> Thanks and Regards
> Noorul
> 
> >>
> >>    * lisp/org-latex.el (org-export-latex-links) : Replaced hard coded
> >>    hyperref format with custom
> >>      variable `org-export-latex-hyperref-format'
> >>
> >> Note that href is not same as hyperref.
> >>
> >> Jambunthan K.
> >>
> >>
> >>> All the best,
> >>> Tom
> >>>
> >>> On Oct 28, 2010, at 3:30 PM, Jambunathan K wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Thomas
> >>>>
> >>>> There was a hint at possible solution (or atleast a partial
> >>>> solution) in
> >>>> my original post. Did you try it before jumping in to rough waters
> >>>> or
> >>>> digging deeper?
> >>>>
> >>>> Do
> >>>>
> >>>> ,----
> >>>> | M-x customize-variable RET org-export-latex-hyperref-format'
> >>>> `----
> >>>>
> >>>> so that your .emacs has an entry like this
> >>>>
> >>>> ,---- [.emacs]
> >>>> |
> >>>> | (custom-set-variables
> >>>> |  '(org-export-latex-hyperref-format "\\hyperref[%s]{%s}"))
> >>>> |
> >>>> `----
> >>>>
> >>>> The above setting solves the problem for me with the following
> >>>> simple
> >>>> Org file.
> >>>>
> >>>> * Heading1
> >>>> Make this section as large as possible so that it fills atleast a
> >>>> page.
> >>>>
> >>>> * Heading2
> >>>> Links to [[Heading1]]
> >>>>
> >>>> Jambunathan K.
> >>>>
> >>>> "Thomas S. Dye" <tsd@tsdye.com> writes:
> >>>>
> >>>>> On Oct 28, 2010, at 12:35 PM, Nick Dokos wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Thomas S. Dye <tsd@tsdye.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Oct 28, 2010, at 11:01 AM, Jambunathan K wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>  This is a regression. release-7.01h is good. HEAD is bad. I get
> >>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>  following line with release-7.01h.<
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>   Links to \hyperref[sec-1]{Heading1}
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>  Jambunathan K.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Aloha Jambunathan K.,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Very many thanks for this information.  I have Org-mode version
> >>>>>>> 7.01trans
> >>>>>>> (release_7.01h.880.g7531f).  I take it the problem I'm having is
> >>>>>>> due to a relatively recent change
> >>>>>>> to Org-mode.  If there is anything I can do to help isolate the
> >>>>>>> problem, please let me know.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Tom,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> If you have the time and the inclination, you might try bisecting
> >>>>>> your
> >>>>>> way through. Bisecting org-mode problems is actually a very good
> >>>>>> way
> >>>>>> to
> >>>>>> practice because the turnaround time is very small.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Prerequisites:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> * you have a clone of the org-mode git repository.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> * you have an org test file.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Steps:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> * [optional, but it makes me feel a little safer] create a test
> >>>>>> branch
> >>>>>> and switch to it:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> git checkout -b test-branch master
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> * I clean out all the compiled files while doing a bisection: it's
> >>>>>> quicker
> >>>>>> than regenerating them every time and I don't have to worry (much)
> >>>>>> about
> >>>>>> emacs loading a wayward .elc file:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> make clean
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> * start the bisection and tell git which commit is known good and
> >>>>>> which is known bad:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> git bisect start
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> # current version is bad
> >>>>>> git bisect bad
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> # release_7.01h was good - I got the name with ``git tag''
> >>>>>> git bisect good release_7.01h
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> That checks out a revision half-way in between the bad and good
> >>>>>> commits: since
> >>>>>> there are about 900 commits in between, you'll be at approx the
> >>>>>> 450-
> >>>>>> mark and it
> >>>>>> should take about 10 bisections to get it down to a single commit.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> * LOOP Now all you have to do is repeat the following steps:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> # since you did ``make clean'' you don't have to worry about .elc
> >>>>>> files
> >>>>>> # just reload all the .el files.
> >>>>>> M-x org-reload
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> visit your org test file, export to LaTeX, check for \href/
> >>>>>> \hyperref (or
> >>>>>> whatever other telltale sign shows badness/goodness).
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> # tell git about it
> >>>>>> git bisect good *OR* git bisect bad
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> This last step will check out another revision and in about 10
> >>>>>> repetitions
> >>>>>> of the loop, you are done.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> * Tell git you are done, so it can clean up:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> git bisect reset
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Theoretically, you could do all of this in your master branch
> >>>>>> without
> >>>>>> creating a test-branch and this last step will reset everything to
> >>>>>> the
> >>>>>> way it was before ``git start''.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> * Post the offending commit to the list.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> * Get back to your master branch:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> git checkout master
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> * If you created a test-branch, clean it out:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> git branch -d test-branch
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> * [Optional] Recreate your .elc files and reload them:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> make
> >>>>>> M-x org-reload
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> And that's it: a half-hour of fun and games. Unless of course, you
> >>>>>> hit upon a revision that is neither good nor bad (in the above
> >>>>>> restricted
> >>>>>> sense): you might get some other problem that prevents you from
> >>>>>> being
> >>>>>> able to answer. That might or might not be easy to resolve, so
> >>>>>> I'll
> >>>>>> leave that as an advanced topic (truth be told, I came up against
> >>>>>> this
> >>>>>> situation a couple of days ago and I didn't know how to proceed:
> >>>>>> so
> >>>>>> it's ignorance more than anything else that prevents me from
> >>>>>> saying
> >>>>>> anything more).
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> If you want to try, I'd be happy to answer questions - I might try
> >>>>>> the
> >>>>>> bisection later on tonight myself in any case. And btw, this is of
> >>>>>> course archeology of a different (and much easier) kind, so I
> >>>>>> imagine
> >>>>>> you'll take to it like a fish in water :-)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> HTH,
> >>>>>> Nick
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Hi Nick,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Irresistible hook at the end there.  I wish this stuff were as easy
> >>>>> as
> >>>>> archaeology is for me.  Your instructions are terrific, though.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I did hit on a revision that was neither good nor bad:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> commit 8562273b272024a630a582b0e1b94c481d8abeec
> >>>>> Author: Eric Schulte <schulte.eric@gmail.com>
> >>>>> Date:   Sat Oct 16 13:21:47 2010 -0600
> >>>>>
> >>>>>   ob-ref: don't forget arguments to referenced code blocks
> >>>>>
> >>>>>   * lisp/ob-ref.el (org-babel-ref-resolve): bringing the referent
> >>>>>     arguments back to their params before evaluation
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This one puts these lines in *Messages* when I export to LaTeX
> >>>>>
> >>>>> executing Org code block...
> >>>>> if: Symbol's value as variable is void: result-type
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I tried using different commits for the initial git bisect good,
> >>>>> hoping that would skip by the problem, but this one appears to have
> >>>>> stuck around a while.  My other two tries both ended with this same
> >>>>> error, but with different commits.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I'm not sure what to do next.  This problem isn't yielding to my
> >>>>> archaeo-logic. :)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> All the best,
> >>>>> Tom
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Emacs-orgmode mailing list
> >> Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
> >> Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
> >> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Emacs-orgmode mailing list
> > Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
> > Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
> > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
> 
> 
> diff --git a/lisp/org-latex.el b/lisp/org-latex.el
> index cdc240c..8f0e0ea 100644
> --- a/lisp/org-latex.el
> +++ b/lisp/org-latex.el
> @@ -295,7 +295,14 @@ markup defined, the first one in the association list will be used."
>    :group 'org-export-latex
>    :type 'string)
>  
> -(defcustom org-export-latex-hyperref-format "\\href{%s}{%s}"
> +(defcustom org-export-latex-href-format "\\href{%s}{%s}"
> +  "A printf format string to be applied to href links.
> +The format must contain two %s instances.  The first will be filled with
> +the link, the second with the link description."
> +  :group 'org-export-latex
> +  :type 'string)
> +
> +(defcustom org-export-latex-hyperref-format "\\hyperref[%s]{%s}"
>    "A printf format string to be applied to hyperref links.
>  The format must contain two %s instances.  The first will be filled with
>  the link, the second with the link description."
> @@ -2016,10 +2023,10 @@ The conversion is made depending of STRING-BEFORE and STRING-AFTER."
>  	      (insert (format
>  		       (org-export-get-coderef-format path desc)
>  		       (cdr (assoc path org-export-code-refs)))))
> -	     (radiop (insert (format "\\hyperref[%s]{%s}"
> +	     (radiop (insert (format org-export-latex-hyperref-format
>  				     (org-solidify-link-text raw-path) desc)))
>  	     ((not type)
> -	      (insert (format "\\hyperref[%s]{%s}"
> +	      (insert (format org-export-latex-hyperref-format
>  			      (org-remove-initial-hash
>  			       (org-solidify-link-text raw-path))
>  			      desc)))
> @@ -2030,7 +2037,7 @@ The conversion is made depending of STRING-BEFORE and STRING-AFTER."
>  		;; a LaTeX issue, but we here implement a work-around anyway.
>  		(setq path (org-export-latex-protect-amp path)
>  		      desc (org-export-latex-protect-amp desc)))
> -	      (insert (format org-export-latex-hyperref-format path desc)))
> +	      (insert (format org-export-latex-href-format path desc)))
>  
>  	     ((functionp (setq fnc (nth 2 (assoc type org-link-protocols))))
>  	      ;; The link protocol has a function for formatting the link
>