From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jambunathan K Subject: Re: Re: Internal links in LaTeX export Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 13:05:49 +0530 Message-ID: <81aalsuqi2.fsf@gmail.com> References: <54309AAF-34E2-47F9-9DF2-236DC9BBFA69@tsdye.com> <80y69i5avh.fsf@mundaneum.com> <8439CC4F-8895-43F1-BE6A-D8E5A491A908@tsdye.com> <81tyk6117u.fsf@gmail.com> <18647.1288305308@alphaville.usa.hp.com> <25705B2C-189C-47A3-B6DC-71026E1DAC09@tsdye.com> <9528.1288322915@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org> <15827.1288331162@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org> <81fwvpnw0n.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=40253 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PDBPx-00025k-1A for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 03:36:33 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PDBPv-0003Kc-Vt for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 03:36:28 -0400 Received: from mail-yx0-f169.google.com ([209.85.213.169]:43026) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PDBPv-0003KV-Te for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 03:36:27 -0400 Received: by yxm34 with SMTP id 34so4670342yxm.0 for ; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 00:36:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (suvayu ali's message of "Sat, 30 Oct 2010 12:56:20 -0700") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: suvayu ali Cc: nicholas.dokos@hp.com, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org suvayu ali writes: > Hi Jambunathan > > On 29 October 2010 03:17, Jambunathan K wrote: >> wish there was a way to say this: >> >> - "do bisection on the revisions where org-latex.el changed (as opposed >> =A0 to revisions where HEAD moved)" >> >> The candidate commits then would have reduced to 30 odd commits rather >> than 851 that one had to contend with. >> > > I see in `man git-bisect' a form like this is shown as valid, > > git bisect start [ [...]] [--] [...] > > Wouldn't that do the job? > Indeed. One more tools in the armour. ,---- [Example from Git Bisect Manual] | Cutting down bisection by giving more parameters to bisect start |=20 | You can further cut down the number of trials, if you know what | part of the tree is involved in the problem you are tracking | down, by specifying path parameters when issuing the bisect start | command: |=20 | $ git bisect start -- arch/i386 include/asm-i386 `---- Jambunathan K.