From: joakim@verona.se
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Why don't datetrees use timestamps?
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 17:21:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3vbhys2ch.fsf@exodia.verona.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 87oansfo02.fsf@alphaville.usersys.redhat.com
Nick Dokos <ndokos@gmail.com> writes:
D> Reuben Thomas <rrt@sc3d.org> writes:
>
>> On 16 March 2015 at 16:52, Subhan Michael Tindall <SubhanT@familycareinc.org> wrote:
>>
>> You can use a custom capture template and have timestamps of various sorts inserted.
>>
>> For example, I have one datetree I use that inserts a date/time stamp using %T (%t gives only date, not time)
>>
>> See the documentation for capture (hit C-c C C to get into the customize interface then scroll down)
>>
>> My question was about the datetree entry headings of the form "2015-03-16 Monday". These aren't controlled by the template. I was interested to know why these
>> headings look very much like timestamps (and effectively are timestamps, though at the top level they mention just a year and at the second level just a year and a
>> month), but aren't actual timestamps.
>>
>> Eric Fraga said "I don't think it would make sense for the headlines in the date-tree to have time stamps"; but my question is not why they don't have time stamps,
>> but why they ARE not time stamps (purely in the formal sense: the information they contain is already effectively a time stamp, as far as I can see).
>>
>
> This is third-hand knowledge and guesswork on my part, but I think that
> datetrees are used for things like journals: "that's what I did that
> day". Datetrees just give you a hierarchical structure of nodes for
> easy navigation: you can look at your journal and open and close nodes
> at will, so you can navigate to the date of interest. The fact that the
> third-level headings look like timestamps is purely coincidental.
>
> Timestamps are given to things that are going to appear in an agenda:
> "that's what I have to do today, tomorrow or next week". They are
> completely orthogonal to datetrees in that respect.
>
> The stuff that ends up in your journal is stuff that (mostly) did not
> appear in the agenda: all the little things that you did that day,
> probably unplanned (otherwise they would be in the agenda!)
>
> Not that the headings in a datetree couldn't be made into timestamps;
> but that's not what people use datetrees for[fn:1]. The one thing that
> would be facilitated if they *were* timestamps, would be clicking on one
> and getting the day agenda for that long-gone day, so you could
> reminisce about the other things that you did that day, that did not end
> up in your journal. Maybe that's enough reason to make them
> timestamps, but there are other (perhaps less convenient) ways
> to do that.
>
> Of course, I may be suffering from a failure of imagination: you might
> be using datetrees in a completely different way, one where having the
> heading be a timestamp is a very good idea, but I can't think of any:
> if you *have* something in mind, do tell.
I often feel the same thing, that datetrees should use timestamps(the
'quiet' kind). The main reason is that I often write a journal entry the
day after, and it would be easier to manipulate the date like you do a
time stamp.
>
>> I was hoping to discover the rationale for the design from a developer :)
>
> You'll have to ask Carsten about it: he invented datetrees I believe (as
> well as most of org), but he does not frequent org circles much these
> days.
>
> Footnotes:
>
> [fn:1] Remember however my caveat about third-hand knowledge and
> guesswork: I don't use datetrees.
>
> Nick
>
>
>
--
Joakim Verona
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-18 16:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-15 17:35 Why don't datetrees use timestamps? Reuben Thomas
2015-03-16 9:21 ` Eric S Fraga
2015-03-16 16:52 ` Subhan Michael Tindall
2015-03-16 21:56 ` Reuben Thomas
2015-03-17 0:47 ` Nick Dokos
2015-03-18 16:21 ` joakim [this message]
2015-03-16 21:58 ` Reuben Thomas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.orgmode.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m3vbhys2ch.fsf@exodia.verona.se \
--to=joakim@verona.se \
--cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).