emacs-orgmode@gnu.org archives
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Alan Schmitt <alan.schmitt@polytechnique.org>
To: Bastien <bzg@gnu.org>
Cc: emacs-orgmode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: org-review-schedule
Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2014 13:16:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m27g6lbmdp.fsf@polytechnique.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <877g6leltk.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> (Bastien's message of "Sat, 19 Apr 2014 10:14:35 +0200")

Hi Bastien,

Thanks a lot for these, I'll look into them. I have a couple questions
in the meantime.

On 2014-04-19 10:14, Bastien <bzg@gnu.org> writes:

> - maybe you can use "naked" timestamps like 2014-04-19 sam.
>   instead of inactive ones, this way using "[" in the agenda
>   will not create false positives by inserting entries with
>   a REVIEW property.

OK. I'm not sure what "[" is supposed to do in the agenda, and I don't
see how it could interfere. (I like inactive time stamps because I can
easily adjust their dates with C-left and C-right, is it possible to do
so with naked timestamps?)

> - I infer from a quick read that this works for the agenda but
>   I guess this could work for both the agenda and Org buffers;

Yes, clearly.

> Since you took inspirationg from org-expiry, I guess some of
> the comments above would apply there too... feel free to hack
> into this directions for both org-expiry.el and org-review.el!
> Actually, maybe both should be merged somehow, since expiring
> is just reviewing entries to interactively delete them.

Yes. But I should think about it more to see where I could take this.

Thanks again,


  reply	other threads:[~2014-04-19 11:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-18 20:27 org-review-schedule Alan Schmitt
2014-04-19  8:14 ` org-review-schedule Bastien
2014-04-19 11:16   ` Alan Schmitt [this message]
2014-04-19 11:51     ` org-review-schedule Bastien
2014-04-24 11:51   ` org-review-schedule Alan Schmitt
2014-04-25  6:51     ` org-review-schedule Nicolas Goaziou
2014-04-25  7:43       ` org-review-schedule Alan Schmitt
2014-04-25  8:02         ` org-review-schedule Nicolas Goaziou
2014-04-27  8:09           ` org-review-schedule Alan Schmitt
2014-04-28  7:20             ` org-review-schedule AW
2014-04-28 11:29               ` org-review-schedule Alan Schmitt
2014-05-06  9:27             ` org-review-schedule Bastien
2014-05-15 10:07             ` org-review-schedule Bastien
2014-05-20 12:48               ` org-review-schedule Alan Schmitt
2014-05-21 12:08                 ` org-review-schedule Bastien
2014-05-21 12:58                   ` org-review-schedule Alan Schmitt
2014-04-26  8:57       ` org-review-schedule Alan Schmitt
2014-04-26 10:38         ` org-review-schedule Thorsten Jolitz
2014-04-26 12:25           ` org-review-schedule Nicolas Goaziou
2014-04-27  8:08             ` org-review-schedule Alan Schmitt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

  List information: https://www.orgmode.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=m27g6lbmdp.fsf@polytechnique.org \
    --to=alan.schmitt@polytechnique.org \
    --cc=bzg@gnu.org \
    --cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \


* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox


This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).