From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alan Schmitt Subject: Re: org-review-schedule Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2014 13:16:02 +0200 Message-ID: References: <877g6leltk.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58241) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WbTHZ-0000X0-6H for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Apr 2014 07:18:11 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WbTHT-0001zW-6f for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Apr 2014 07:18:05 -0400 In-Reply-To: <877g6leltk.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> (Bastien's message of "Sat, 19 Apr 2014 10:14:35 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Bastien Cc: emacs-orgmode Hi Bastien, Thanks a lot for these, I'll look into them. I have a couple questions in the meantime. On 2014-04-19 10:14, Bastien writes: > - maybe you can use "naked" timestamps like 2014-04-19 sam. > instead of inactive ones, this way using "[" in the agenda > will not create false positives by inserting entries with > a REVIEW property. OK. I'm not sure what "[" is supposed to do in the agenda, and I don't see how it could interfere. (I like inactive time stamps because I can easily adjust their dates with C-left and C-right, is it possible to do so with naked timestamps?) > - I infer from a quick read that this works for the agenda but > I guess this could work for both the agenda and Org buffers; Yes, clearly. > Since you took inspirationg from org-expiry, I guess some of > the comments above would apply there too... feel free to hack > into this directions for both org-expiry.el and org-review.el! > Actually, maybe both should be merged somehow, since expiring > is just reviewing entries to interactively delete them. Yes. But I should think about it more to see where I could take this. Thanks again, Alan