emacs-orgmode@gnu.org archives
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: tsd@tsdye.com (Thomas S. Dye)
To: R.M.Krug@gmail.com
Cc: emacs-orgmode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: "Wrapping" section into LaTeX statements?
Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 05:57:38 -1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m162c2u2vh.fsf@tsdye.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FACDF3A.6080902@gmail.com> (Rainer M. Krug's message of "Fri, 11 May 2012 11:43:22 +0200")

Rainer M Krug <r.m.krug@gmail.com> writes:

> Hi
>
> I want to wrap a section of a document into LaTeX statements, as I would like to redefine
> \subsectionbreak so that it does a \pagebreak before - but *only in one section*:
>
> * A normal section
> * Here I want the redefinition
> #+BEGIN_LaTeX
>   \let\oldsubsection = \subsection
>   \renewcommand{\subsection}[1]{
>     \pagebreak{}
>     \oldsubsection{#1}
>   }
> #+END_LaTeX
> ** subsection 1
> ** subsection 2
> * And here I want to use the old sectionbreak
> #+BEGIN_LaTeX
>   \renewcommand{\subsection}[1]{
>     \oldsubsection{#1}
>   }
> #+END_LaTeX
> ** subsection 1
> ** subsection 2
>
> Now I can do this as above, but I don't like it, as the second LaTeX code actually should be at
> the end of the previous section and if I insert a section, I have to move the LaTeX code.
>
> I could put it into the previous section, but then it would be in the subsection 2, and if I add a
> subsection 3, I would have to move the LaTeX code into this subsection.
>
> So nothing is optimal - is there an alternative which makes more sense and is easier to maintain?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Rainer
Aloha Rainer,

* section

\pagebreak
** subsection 1
** subsection 2

Would this work?  Note that \pagebreak doesn't have a required
argument--the optional argument \pagebreak[] lets LaTeX decide whether
or not to break the page.

All the best,
Tom

-- 
Thomas S. Dye
http://www.tsdye.com

  reply	other threads:[~2012-05-11 15:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-05-11  9:43 "Wrapping" section into LaTeX statements? Rainer M Krug
2012-05-11 15:57 ` Thomas S. Dye [this message]
2012-05-14  7:33   ` Rainer M Krug

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.orgmode.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=m162c2u2vh.fsf@tsdye.com \
    --to=tsd@tsdye.com \
    --cc=R.M.Krug@gmail.com \
    --cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).