emacs-orgmode@gnu.org archives
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Tom Weissmann <trmsw@yahoo.co.uk>
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Progress logging with org-mode
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 10:08:03 +0000 (UTC)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <loom.20071004T095606-41@post.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 80f759140e2a298fcb4de1f0393987aa@science.uva.nl

Carsten Dominik <dominik <at> science.uva.nl> writes:

> I cannot reproduce the indentation you are getting - are you  
> re-indenting the lines
> with TAB or so?

In fact what happens is that any CLOCK below another one that has a note is
indented more than the CLOCK above it:

Eg (from a real org-mode file this time)

  CLOCK: [2007-10-03 qua 14:36]--[2007-10-03 qua 14:40] =>  0:04
  - Updating wiki about mlc.
    CLOCK: [2007-10-03 qua 13:28]--[2007-10-03 qua 14:36] =>  1:08
  - Debugging mlc.
    CLOCK: [2007-10-03 qua 11:46]--[2007-10-03 qua 12:10] =>  0:24

This also means that any body text underneath the clocks will be indented
differently depending on whether there are notes to the clocks.

> > and the useful information about the subtask is in
> > danger of being swamped by a mass of reverse-ordered progress logs.
> 
> Actually, I have been bothered by that too.  Maybe we should have
> a special CLOCK drawer and make all those entries go in there....

Yes, that would make sense. I thought about it but then decided I didn't like
the idea of having drawers for all the subtasks - as if that would be noisier
than having lots of CLOCK entries in all the subtasks!

I'll try tweaking the clock-out function to put completed clocks into a drawer,
and see how I like it.

Cheers,
Tom SW.

  reply	other threads:[~2007-10-04 10:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-09-29  1:01 Progress logging with org-mode Tom Weissmann
2007-10-04  9:44 ` Carsten Dominik
2007-10-04 10:08   ` Tom Weissmann [this message]
2007-10-04 10:45     ` Carsten Dominik
2007-10-04 11:02       ` Tom Weissmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.orgmode.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=loom.20071004T095606-41@post.gmane.org \
    --to=trmsw@yahoo.co.uk \
    --cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).