From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tom Weissmann Subject: Re: Progress logging with org-mode Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 10:08:03 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <80f759140e2a298fcb4de1f0393987aa@science.uva.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IdNek-0002a7-9G for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Oct 2007 06:10:10 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IdNeg-0002ZP-JH for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Oct 2007 06:10:08 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IdNeg-0002Z1-75 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Oct 2007 06:10:06 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IdNef-0007Do-IK for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Oct 2007 06:10:05 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1IdNe1-0006AH-JS for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Oct 2007 10:09:25 +0000 Received: from mail2.siscog.pt ([195.22.30.41]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 04 Oct 2007 10:09:25 +0000 Received: from trmsw by mail2.siscog.pt with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 04 Oct 2007 10:09:25 +0000 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Carsten Dominik science.uva.nl> writes: > I cannot reproduce the indentation you are getting - are you > re-indenting the lines > with TAB or so? In fact what happens is that any CLOCK below another one that has a note is indented more than the CLOCK above it: Eg (from a real org-mode file this time) CLOCK: [2007-10-03 qua 14:36]--[2007-10-03 qua 14:40] => 0:04 - Updating wiki about mlc. CLOCK: [2007-10-03 qua 13:28]--[2007-10-03 qua 14:36] => 1:08 - Debugging mlc. CLOCK: [2007-10-03 qua 11:46]--[2007-10-03 qua 12:10] => 0:24 This also means that any body text underneath the clocks will be indented differently depending on whether there are notes to the clocks. > > and the useful information about the subtask is in > > danger of being swamped by a mass of reverse-ordered progress logs. > > Actually, I have been bothered by that too. Maybe we should have > a special CLOCK drawer and make all those entries go in there.... Yes, that would make sense. I thought about it but then decided I didn't like the idea of having drawers for all the subtasks - as if that would be noisier than having lots of CLOCK entries in all the subtasks! I'll try tweaking the clock-out function to put completed clocks into a drawer, and see how I like it. Cheers, Tom SW.