* struggling with fixed date entries
@ 2007-08-27 0:40 Rainer Stengele
2007-08-27 1:14 ` Bernt Hansen
2007-08-27 1:14 ` Bernt Hansen
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Rainer Stengele @ 2007-08-27 0:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: emacs-orgmode
I wonder what is the best way to work with fixed dates in org.
I do not want to them entered as "SCHEDULED".
Say I have a meeting on a certain date.
I do not want to enter it as a todo, as for me it is not really a todo
but a simple meeting which is done when it is over.
If I enter it as a simple headline (todo or no todo) and schedule it it
will show up after the meeting as due until I mark it as "DONE" or
delete the schedule.
Now I could use the diary. Agenda view will show the event and complain
no more after it is past. Disadvantage: I cannot org-tag the diary entry.
As I do not use the diary and diary functions are included in org I can
use something like:
* Fixed date event :@LOCATION:
<%%(diary-date 29 08 2007)>
which is ugly and cannot be entered with the help of the calendar (as by
"C-c C-s"
What do you think? Would it be a good idea to at least support the
entering of a "diary-date" by a org function directly with the help of
the calendar? Maybe create a third type of schedule type: "FIXED"
besides of "SCHEDULED" and "DEADLINE"?
How do you manage fixed events?
Rainer
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: struggling with fixed date entries
2007-08-27 0:40 struggling with fixed date entries Rainer Stengele
@ 2007-08-27 1:14 ` Bernt Hansen
2007-08-27 1:14 ` Bernt Hansen
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Bernt Hansen @ 2007-08-27 1:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: emacs-orgmode
Rainer Stengele <rainer.stengele@diplan.de> writes:
> I wonder what is the best way to work with fixed dates in org.
> I do not want to them entered as "SCHEDULED".
>
> Say I have a meeting on a certain date.
> I do not want to enter it as a todo, as for me it is not really a todo
> but a simple meeting which is done when it is over.
> If I enter it as a simple headline (todo or no todo) and schedule it
> it will show up after the meeting as due until I mark it as "DONE" or
> delete the schedule.
>
> Now I could use the diary. Agenda view will show the event and
> complain no more after it is past. Disadvantage: I cannot org-tag the
> diary entry.
> As I do not use the diary and diary functions are included in org I
> can use something like:
>
> * Fixed date event :@LOCATION:
> <%%(diary-date 29 08 2007)>
>
> which is ugly and cannot be entered with the help of the calendar (as
> by "C-c C-s"
>
> What do you think? Would it be a good idea to at least support the
> entering of a "diary-date" by a org function directly with the help of
> the calendar? Maybe create a third type of schedule type: "FIXED"
> besides of "SCHEDULED" and "DEADLINE"?
>
> How do you manage fixed events?
What's wrong with just using a regular date?
* Test Meeting
<2007-08-27 Mon 10:00-11:00>
It shows up on the agenda on the date and time specified similar to a
diary entry.
Bernt
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: struggling with fixed date entries
2007-08-27 0:40 struggling with fixed date entries Rainer Stengele
2007-08-27 1:14 ` Bernt Hansen
@ 2007-08-27 1:14 ` Bernt Hansen
2007-08-27 8:13 ` Rainer Stengele
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Bernt Hansen @ 2007-08-27 1:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: emacs-orgmode
Rainer Stengele <rainer.stengele@diplan.de> writes:
> I wonder what is the best way to work with fixed dates in org.
> I do not want to them entered as "SCHEDULED".
>
> Say I have a meeting on a certain date.
> I do not want to enter it as a todo, as for me it is not really a todo
> but a simple meeting which is done when it is over.
> If I enter it as a simple headline (todo or no todo) and schedule it
> it will show up after the meeting as due until I mark it as "DONE" or
> delete the schedule.
>
> Now I could use the diary. Agenda view will show the event and
> complain no more after it is past. Disadvantage: I cannot org-tag the
> diary entry.
> As I do not use the diary and diary functions are included in org I
> can use something like:
>
> * Fixed date event :@LOCATION:
> <%%(diary-date 29 08 2007)>
>
> which is ugly and cannot be entered with the help of the calendar (as
> by "C-c C-s"
>
> What do you think? Would it be a good idea to at least support the
> entering of a "diary-date" by a org function directly with the help of
> the calendar? Maybe create a third type of schedule type: "FIXED"
> besides of "SCHEDULED" and "DEADLINE"?
>
> How do you manage fixed events?
What's wrong with just using a regular date?
* Test
<2007-08-27 Mon 10:00-11:00>
It shows up on the agenda on the date and time specified similar to a
diary entry.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: struggling with fixed date entries
2007-08-27 1:14 ` Bernt Hansen
@ 2007-08-27 8:13 ` Rainer Stengele
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Rainer Stengele @ 2007-08-27 8:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: emacs-orgmode
Bernt Hansen schrieb:
> Rainer Stengele <rainer.stengele@diplan.de> writes:
>
>> I wonder what is the best way to work with fixed dates in org.
>> I do not want to them entered as "SCHEDULED".
>>
>> Say I have a meeting on a certain date.
>> I do not want to enter it as a todo, as for me it is not really a todo
>> but a simple meeting which is done when it is over.
>> If I enter it as a simple headline (todo or no todo) and schedule it
>> it will show up after the meeting as due until I mark it as "DONE" or
>> delete the schedule.
>>
>> Now I could use the diary. Agenda view will show the event and
>> complain no more after it is past. Disadvantage: I cannot org-tag the
>> diary entry.
>> As I do not use the diary and diary functions are included in org I
>> can use something like:
>>
>> * Fixed date event :@LOCATION:
>> <%%(diary-date 29 08 2007)>
>>
>> which is ugly and cannot be entered with the help of the calendar (as
>> by "C-c C-s"
>>
>> What do you think? Would it be a good idea to at least support the
>> entering of a "diary-date" by a org function directly with the help of
>> the calendar? Maybe create a third type of schedule type: "FIXED"
>> besides of "SCHEDULED" and "DEADLINE"?
>>
>> How do you manage fixed events?
>
> What's wrong with just using a regular date?
>
> * Test
> <2007-08-27 Mon 10:00-11:00>
>
> It shows up on the agenda on the date and time specified similar to a
> diary entry.
Huh, that was easy, thank you!
Why didn't I find it? I was too deep into "SCHEDULED" and "DEADLINE"
thinking and simply did not read the docs fully:
Plain time stamp
A simple time stamp just assigns a date/time to an item. This is
just like writing down an appointment in a paper agenda, or like writing
down an event in a diary, when you want to take note of when something
happened. In the timeline and agenda displays, the headline of an entry
associated with a plain time stamp will be shown exactly on that date.
* Meet Peter at the movies <2006-11-01 Wed 19:15>
* Discussion on climate change <2006-11-02 Thu 20:00-22:00>
Sorry for stealing your time. And thanks again.
Rainer
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-08-27 8:13 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-08-27 0:40 struggling with fixed date entries Rainer Stengele
2007-08-27 1:14 ` Bernt Hansen
2007-08-27 1:14 ` Bernt Hansen
2007-08-27 8:13 ` Rainer Stengele
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).