emacs-orgmode@gnu.org archives
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: "Charles C. Berry" <ccberry@ucsd.edu>
To: Andreas Leha <andreas.leha@med.uni-goettingen.de>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Inline code :results replace not working
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 08:23:14 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.OSX.2.00.1411100759470.428@charles-berrys-macbook.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <oluh9y7e0z5.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de>

On Mon, 10 Nov 2014, Andreas Leha wrote:

> Hi Sebastien,
>
> Sebastien Vauban <sva-news@mygooglest.com> writes:
>> Andreas Leha wrote:
>>> Sebastien Vauban <sva-news@mygooglest.com> writes:
>>>> Andreas Leha wrote:
>>>>>> For me, that's the correct behavior, as inline code blocks are
>>>>>> *only expected to be evaluated during export*.
>>>>>
>>>>> I disagree here.
>>>>

[snip]

>>>
>>> Nonetheless, from a literate programming perspective, I think that
>>> replaceable (and raw) inline results are definitely desirable.
>>> Regardless of the state of their implementation in orgmode right now.

+1.

I find myself writing an inline src block, then typing `C-c C-c C-x u' to 
view and then remove the result, then revise, and repeat. I'd be happy to 
just leave it in the document.

>>
>> FWIW, I'm not -- yet? -- convinced we should see the results of inline
>> code blocks inlined in the paragraph (and I'm not sure either it does
>> not cause interpretation problems); but, for sure, I'd love to be able
>> to preview the value interactively, at least.
>>
>>> So, I do not doubt, that you and Nicolas are right with that
>>> replaceable inline results are not implemented and are -- from
>>> orgmodes perspective -- expected to be evaluated only during export.
>>>
>>> My message was meant more as a feature request saying that I consider
>>> replaceable inline results useful and would like to see them supported
>>> by org.
>>
>> Could you better explain your statement: "Limiting the use of inline
>> code to eval-on-export-only renders all the org-babel-execute-subtree
>> and related functionality useless"?
>>
>> I'm not sure to fully understand your use-case.  That'd certainly be
>> worth explaining why you think it must be changed in the first instance
>> if you'd like Eric or Nicolas (or someone else) to change that.
>>
>
> Consider this simple toy example.  If you press 'C-c C-v s' in the
> subtree, the document is 'broken' for export.  If you press 'C-c C-v s'
> twice or more the document is 'broken' even for display.
>

[deleted ECM]

It seems like implementing removable inline results cleanly is a 
nettlesome issue.

But with the recent implementation of `org-babel-inline-result-wrap' it 
would be trivial to wrap results with something like "@@babel:%s@@",
which can be found and removed more reliably than "=%s=".

On export, either the :back-end property of such export-snippets could be 
revised to the backend in use by a parse-tree filter or the code in each 
org-<backend>-export-snippet could be revised to accept such snippets.

There is still the matter of adding code to find and remove those snippets 
where Nicolas pointed in ob-core.al.

But it seems do-able.

HTH,

Chuck

  reply	other threads:[~2014-11-10 16:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-11-07 10:01 Inline code :results replace not working mcg
2014-11-08 21:27 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2014-11-10  9:21   ` Sebastien Vauban
2014-11-10  9:40     ` Andreas Leha
2014-11-10 10:27       ` Sebastien Vauban
2014-11-10 10:56         ` Andreas Leha
2014-11-10 11:16           ` Sebastien Vauban
2014-11-10 11:42             ` Andreas Leha
2014-11-10 16:23               ` Charles C. Berry [this message]
2014-11-10 17:03                 ` Ista Zahn
2014-11-10 20:04                   ` Grant Rettke
2014-11-10 20:45                     ` Thomas S. Dye
2014-11-10 21:26                       ` Grant Rettke
2014-11-11  1:53                     ` Ista Zahn
2014-11-11 14:37                       ` Grant Rettke
2014-11-13 18:40                       ` Michael
2014-11-14 15:11                         ` Grant Rettke
2014-11-12  9:03                 ` Sebastien Vauban
2014-11-12 17:26                   ` Charles Berry

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.orgmode.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.OSX.2.00.1411100759470.428@charles-berrys-macbook.local \
    --to=ccberry@ucsd.edu \
    --cc=andreas.leha@med.uni-goettingen.de \
    --cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).