emacs-orgmode@gnu.org archives
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: "Gustav Wikström" <gustav@whil.se>
To: "adam@alphapapa.net" <adam@alphapapa.net>
Cc: "emacs-orgmode@gnu.org" <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Org document concept + document property drawers
Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2019 16:08:03 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <HE1PR02MB3033F47A9890C26027AED2A0DABF0@HE1PR02MB3033.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com> (raw)

Hi Adam,

> This is a very interesting idea, and I don't want to dismiss your work,
> but I am concerned about how much third-party code will likely break by
> changing the results returned by org-element for parsing an Org buffer.
> I haven't thoroughly studied all of the code in your patches, so I may
> be wrong, but I think the breakage could be extensive.  For example,
> simple operations like destructuring the results of org-element parsing
> functions may be broken.  Have you done any investigation into this
> issue?
> 
> Maybe there should be a transitional period in which the existing
> org-element parsing functions would work as before, and the new
> document-level elements would be returned by a new org-element
> document-level parsing function.  Frankly, if there is breakage,the
> transition would probably take a few years, because there is a lot of
> code out there that has worked for years and may not be updated or
> replaced for years.

I have not investigated much into that to be honest. I'd argue that
it's a fairly trivial change in terms of the parser though. Everything
will work as before except when you're after the whole buffer
syntax-tree. In that case one will have to dig one step deeper into
the tree to find the content.

Previous tree: 
(org-data nil CONTENTS)

With this patch:
(org-data nil (document (doc-props) CONTENTS))

Yeah.. The structure changed a bit. But it's a fairly trivial change 
in my opinion. Everything else works as before AFAIK... But I might be 
overseeing something. Please enlighten me in that case!

I've made specification-changes only at two locations in the
test-cases for org-element. (ref. patch nr.1) 

Best
Gustav

             reply	other threads:[~2019-09-01 16:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-01 16:08 Gustav Wikström [this message]
2019-09-01 16:26 ` [RFC] Org document concept + document property drawers Adam Porter
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-09-01 19:17 Gustav Wikström
2019-09-01 19:12 Gustav Wikström
2019-09-01 18:51 Gustav Wikström
2019-08-31 18:49 Gustav Wikström
2019-09-01  5:20 ` Adam Porter
2019-09-01 10:38 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2019-09-01 14:41   ` Gustav Wikström
2019-09-06 20:09     ` Nicolas Goaziou
2019-09-29  9:39       ` Gustav Wikström
2019-09-01 15:25 ` Gustav Wikström
2019-09-01 16:11   ` Adam Porter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.orgmode.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=HE1PR02MB3033F47A9890C26027AED2A0DABF0@HE1PR02MB3033.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=gustav@whil.se \
    --cc=adam@alphapapa.net \
    --cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).