From: John Kitchin <email@example.com> To: firstname.lastname@example.org Cc: email@example.com Subject: Re: Get =#+RESULTS= without re-evaluating source code block? Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2021 18:31:03 -0500 [thread overview] Message-ID: <CAJ51ETpWnQrr6fVH26B5dMPU6ucw2M3Mn3pCWzERUCCXkwapiA@mail.gmail.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20210127223821.GB14346@tuxteam.de> [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1717 bytes --] I tried this but it did not work for me. On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 5:38 PM <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 05:14:43PM -0500, doltes wrote: > > Get =#+RESULTS= without re-evaluating source code block? > > > > Let's suppose I have a code block which requires a long time to finish > > > > #+NAME: big-computation > > #+begin_src bash > > sleep 5 # Some computation which requires a long time to complete. > > echo a > > #+end_src > > > > #+RESULTS: big-computation > > #+begin_example > > a > > #+end_example > > > > I want to use the results of that code block in other code blocks so I > > use a =noweb= reference (see below.) > > > > #+begin_src bash :noweb yes > > printf "%s\n" <<big-computation()>> > > #+end_src > > > > #+RESULTS: > > #+begin_example > > a > > > > #+end_example > > > > However, doing this (i.e. using a =noweb= reference) would make the > > command to be evaluated whenever getting its results. I don't want > > this, I want the =:noweb= reference to actually use the already > > computed results. > > > > So, my question is: Is it possible to use the actual =#+RESULTS= code > > block instead of always evaluating it when referencing the results > > through a =:noweb= reference? > > Perhaps "Cache results of evaluation" (15.5 Evaluating Code Blocks, > in the Interwebs here  is for you. > > In short, add a header argument :cache yes to your code block. > > Cheers > >  https://orgmode.org/org.html#Evaluating-Code-Blocks > > - t > -- John ----------------------------------- Professor John Kitchin Doherty Hall A207F Department of Chemical Engineering Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA 15213 412-268-7803 @johnkitchin http://kitchingroup.cheme.cmu.edu [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2769 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-27 23:32 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-01-27 22:14 doltes 2021-01-27 22:38 ` tomas 2021-01-27 23:31 ` John Kitchin [this message] 2021-01-28 3:26 ` Greg Minshall 2021-02-02 2:10 ` John Kitchin 2021-02-02 20:02 ` Nick Dokos 2021-01-27 23:33 ` doltes
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style List information: https://www.orgmode.org/ * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=CAJ51ETpWnQrr6fVH26B5dMPU6ucw2M3Mn3pCWzERUCCXkwapiA@mail.gmail.com \ --email@example.com \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --email@example.com \ --subject='Re: Get =#+RESULTS= without re-evaluating source code block?' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this inbox: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).