emacs-orgmode@gnu.org archives
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: "Alan E. Davis" <lngndvs@gmail.com>
To: Eric Abrahamsen <eric@ericabrahamsen.net>
Cc: org-mode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: org-annotate/collaboration?
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2017 23:09:54 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAF-1L2QsPLYDOtkjbFTD1U=Gpn7R73d05pkntg8tykC-_WWqmA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87wpd02b3s.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2692 bytes --]

I am looking for something a little different than this: annotated ls
listings.  I have been searching blindly for years for this.

Back in the 90s was a Dos clone called 4dos, which featured directory
listings with annotations, such that typing whatever the command was
(dir?), gave a listing with the file name just like "dir" but also a
description of the file.

It was exceedingly useful for me, in keeping track of a large number of
files.  I have never seen anything like it.

Could org-annotate fulfill at least part of this requirement?  (I have
posted to this list a similar question quite some years ago.)

Alan Davis

On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 9:21 PM, Eric Abrahamsen <eric@ericabrahamsen.net>
wrote:

> Matt Price <moptop99@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > Does anyone use org-annotate actively? I'm wondering what your
> > workflow is, how you incorporate comments, etc.
>
> I wrote it, and I don't use it that much. I do use it for quick
> notes-to-self when writing, but footnotes do the job just as well.
>
> > I'm hoping to embark on a book project with a colleague. I would like
> > to use org-mode if I can, but I need to get a sense of the
> > collaboration workflow. When you work on projects together, do you use
> > annotations? Or git pull requests? If the latter, od you use any
> > filters, or any magit tricks, to approve or modify suggested changes
> > chunk by chunk?
>
> It's a huge problem, and one that org-annotate isn't going to solve. I
> do a lot of manuscript editing, and passing files around, and have only
> barely gotten some people to accept my "weird" workflow, which is to
> send them a clean version of an edited file, and along with that an HTML
> file containing htmlized word-diff output, where the insertions and
> deletions are colorized. They make further edits on the clean copy, and
> I do another go-around. It's a huge pain.
>
> > My colleague is familiar with markdown but for major projects has only
> > ever used word. I'm trying to figure out how best to help her move to
> > a text--based mode of production; the markdown ecosystem seems a lot
> > larger, and I don't want the transition to be too painful. But OTOH I
> > really want to stay in org if I can!
>
> I wish there were better solutions out there!
>
> Eric
>
>
>


-- 
[I do not] carry such information in my mind since it is readily
available in books. …The value of a college education is not the
learning of many facts but the training of the mind to think.
          ---Albert Einstein



"Sweet instruments hung up in cases. . . keep their sounds to themselves."

         ---Shakespeare, _Timon of Athens_

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 4105 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2017-02-09  7:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-09  1:10 org-annotate/collaboration? Matt Price
2017-02-09  5:21 ` org-annotate/collaboration? Eric Abrahamsen
2017-02-09  7:09   ` Alan E. Davis [this message]
2017-02-09 22:07     ` org-annotate/collaboration? Eric Abrahamsen
2017-02-10  4:43       ` org-annotate/collaboration? Alan E. Davis
2017-02-10 21:19         ` org-annotate/collaboration? Cook, Malcolm
2017-02-10 22:59           ` org-annotate/collaboration? Alan E. Davis
2017-02-11 18:07   ` org-annotate/collaboration? Uwe Brauer
2017-02-14  1:55     ` org-annotate/collaboration? Eric Abrahamsen
2017-02-14 21:44       ` org-annotate/collaboration? Uwe Brauer
2017-02-16  1:45         ` org-annotate/collaboration? Eric Abrahamsen
2017-02-16 18:53           ` org-annotate/collaboration? Uwe Brauer
2017-02-11 22:20 ` org-annotate/collaboration? Eduardo Mercovich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.orgmode.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAF-1L2QsPLYDOtkjbFTD1U=Gpn7R73d05pkntg8tykC-_WWqmA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=lngndvs@gmail.com \
    --cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
    --cc=eric@ericabrahamsen.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).