From: John Hendy <jw.hendy@gmail.com>
To: Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk>, Ken Mankoff <mankoff@gmail.com>,
John Hendy <jw.hendy@gmail.com>,
"emacs-orgmode@gnu.org" <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: exporting documents w/ babel results w/o evaluating babel blocks
Date: Fri, 20 May 2016 12:23:09 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+M2ft97Fguusv-pRo-SNmy36C8STgcPk_JQ3x=cgLkSN-L83g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87wpmomz6x.fsf@ucl.ac.uk>
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 12:11 PM, Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk> wrote:
> On Friday, 20 May 2016 at 17:06, Ken Mankoff wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> Thanks for clarifying your workflow. That seems to work for a small
>> example. But what would you do if you had a manuscript with 100 code
>> blocks in it? And in general you're exporting it a lot without
>> changing anything in code, just editing the non-code text. But
>> occasionally you want to modify a code block (and its results) too?
>
> So, if I understand correctly, you have org-export-babel-evaluate set to
> nil? If I set that, I no longer get asked whether I want anything
> evaluated but the (existing) results do get exported. I just tried it
> to confirm.
Using this block,
#+begin_src R :exports results
print("hello")
#+end_src
I get the following (with *no* pre-existing #+results block manually
created with C-c C-c):
| *o-e-b-e* | *o-c-b-e* | *buffer* | *doc* |
|-----------+-----------+-----------+------------------|
| nil | t | nothing | =print("hello")= |
| t | t | nothing | =hello= |
| t | nil | nothing | =hello= |
| nil | nil | nothing | =print("hello")= |
|-----------+-----------+-----------+------------------|
Variables org-export-babel-evaluate and org-confirm-babel-evaluate
abbreviated above.
I find two things bizarre:
- these options (well, just o-e-b-e it seems) would change what's exported?
- why without C-c C-c which initiates the #+results block, exporting
which causes babel to execute code doesn't insert the results block.
Is this intended or for a reason?
I've not really looked into these variables and just use :eval yes/no
to toggle things. I find it easy enough to create all my blocks with
:eval no, and do a quick change to =yes= as I'm iteratively exporting.
Finally, I can do a replace-string to catch any missed :eval yes's
before a final export.
>
>> In the above scenario, I used to edit the code, and =C-c C-c= it
>> manually to get the updates into the results. When I exported the
>> document (C-e l l), it would export in ~1 second (even a >100 page
>> document) and not prompt me about executing code blocks.
>
> Yes, I do this as well in such a case.
>
> --
> : Eric S Fraga (0xFFFCF67D), Emacs 25.0.92.1, Org release_8.3.4-775-g3308a5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-20 17:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-20 15:57 exporting documents w/ babel results w/o evaluating babel blocks Ken Mankoff
2016-05-20 16:14 ` John Hendy
2016-05-20 16:45 ` Ken Mankoff
2016-05-20 17:25 ` John Hendy
[not found] ` <878addc2b6b14ce99e907921f0985d24@HE1PR01MB1898.eurprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com>
2016-05-20 16:59 ` Eric S Fraga
2016-05-20 17:06 ` Ken Mankoff
[not found] ` <b29fde01938940d3b115abd9b257dc57@HE1PR01MB1898.eurprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com>
2016-05-20 17:11 ` Eric S Fraga
2016-05-20 17:23 ` John Hendy [this message]
2016-05-20 17:38 ` Ken Mankoff
2016-05-20 17:32 ` Ken Mankoff
2016-05-20 18:46 ` Nick Dokos
2016-05-20 21:20 ` Charles C. Berry
2016-05-21 19:01 ` Nick Dokos
2016-05-22 19:58 ` John Hendy
2016-05-22 21:52 ` Charles C. Berry
2016-05-23 18:27 ` Nick Dokos
2016-05-23 18:34 ` John Hendy
2016-05-23 20:08 ` Charles C. Berry
2016-05-24 1:34 ` Grant Rettke
2016-05-24 10:17 ` Andreas Kiermeier
2016-05-24 14:32 ` Ista Zahn
2016-05-24 15:09 ` Anthony Cowley
2016-05-24 15:48 ` Charles C. Berry
2016-05-24 15:53 ` Charles C. Berry
2016-05-20 23:06 ` Ken Mankoff
[not found] <0e207e1cbcc44453b29eea98ca5ebe05@HE1PR01MB1898.eurprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com>
2016-05-20 16:13 ` Eric S Fraga
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.orgmode.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CA+M2ft97Fguusv-pRo-SNmy36C8STgcPk_JQ3x=cgLkSN-L83g@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=jw.hendy@gmail.com \
--cc=e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk \
--cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
--cc=mankoff@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).