From: John Hendy <jw.hendy@gmail.com>
To: Eric Schulte <schulte.eric@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Running babel blocks in :noexport: sections
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2012 15:22:59 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+M2ft--rKB2iJfYV=o08asw46hu1OS9TN3kX+WYkkn0MQnvtw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+M2ft-tVkhVGv0_1dGNpVb2jFO1yaAzecXbvrRpDj1sx=gQ-w@mail.gmail.com>
Just kidding... just checked *Messages* buffer, and all the headlines
I converted to COMMENT headlines are *not* executing the enclosed
babel blocks.
Is there a setting for this you have and I don't?
John
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 12:23 PM, John Hendy <jw.hendy@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 5:57 PM, Eric Schulte <schulte.eric@gmail.com> wrote:
>> John Hendy <jw.hendy@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> For papers and beamer presentations, I sometimes hide more "universal"
>>> babel blocks inside a sort of setup headline. I thought I'd done this
>>> before, but perhaps not... The idea would be like so:
>>>
>>> * Data setup :noexport:
>>>
>>> #+begin_src R :session r
>>>
>>> load libraries
>>> read data files
>>> do universal operations
>>>
>>> #+end_src
>>>
>>> * Slide
>>>
>>> #+begin_src R :session r :exports results :results output graphics
>>>
>>> subset(larger_data_set_from_above)
>>> processing
>>> plot something
>>>
>>> #+end_src
>>>
>>> I noticed today that my :noexport: setup sections (I had a couple)
>>> were not updating. I re-defined a variable name further down in my
>>> file and it was re-using the definition from an above setup section
>>> (tagged with :noexport:). Just because I don't want it export doesn't
>>> mean I don't want to have useful stuff in the headline...
>>>
>>> Is this a bug/inappropriate setting, desirable based on how others use
>>> :noexport: headlines, or would others see value in executing babel
>>> blocks in :noexport: headlines?
>>>
>>> If I /didn't/ want it executed, I'd use :execute no.
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks for any input,
>>> John
>>>
>>
>> Instead of tagging the headline as :noexport: you can add the COMMENT
>> flag to it. This should result in your desired behavior. See the
>> attached example.
>>
>>
>
> Brilliant. That'll do just fine. Never knew about that!
>
> John
>
>>
>> --
>> Eric Schulte
>> http://cs.unm.edu/~eschulte
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-28 20:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-27 19:03 Running babel blocks in :noexport: sections John Hendy
2012-10-27 20:14 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2012-10-27 22:57 ` Eric Schulte
2012-10-28 17:23 ` John Hendy
2012-10-28 20:22 ` John Hendy [this message]
2012-10-28 21:14 ` Eric Schulte
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.orgmode.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CA+M2ft--rKB2iJfYV=o08asw46hu1OS9TN3kX+WYkkn0MQnvtw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=jw.hendy@gmail.com \
--cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
--cc=schulte.eric@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).