emacs-orgmode@gnu.org archives
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Marvin Doyley <marvinpas@gmail.com>
To: Jeff Horn <jrhorn424@gmail.com>
Cc: Richard Lawrence <richard.lawrence@berkeley.edu>, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Re: General question on dealing with Latex to word conversion
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 14:41:21 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTikndZCkesvYJ6vVhQHqdHb3iRjF1gQQmahTHY9n@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikjtjfEr1xFVAf8CkS1PLd=-NnP-xL8qUaipH2f@mail.gmail.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2212 bytes --]

This is indeed a unique way of looking at the problem. I am not sure
converting from word to Org is the way to go, because vast majority of my
research notes are already in Org. But having said that a good work around
could be to create a crude version in word (ditch the equations, but export
as plain text), get everyone comments, and incorporate the changes in Org
before exporting to latex This will try this in the initial stage of my next
grant proposal.

cheers
M



On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Jeff Horn <jrhorn424@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Richard Lawrence
> <richard.lawrence@berkeley.edu> wrote:
> > Jeff Horn <jrhorn424@gmail.com> writes:
> >
> >>> I'm not trying to be antagonistic, or insensitive to your particular
> >>> situation.  But since no one else has said it, I just wanted to point
> >>> out that it might be easier or more efficient, in terms of overall
> >>> person-hours, to convert from Word to Org, rather than the other way
> >>> around.
> >>
> >> If they're stuck in word and the OP is using org, he may be the only
> >> person on his team capable of changing his workflow. In that case,
> >> person hours are saved if he switches and doesn't have to educate
> >> everyone else (or they educate themselves), though *his* man hours are
> >> not economized.
> >
> > Well, doesn't that depend on how long it would take to educate everyone
> > else, vs. how many hours he will eventually spend doing manual
> > conversion to Word?
>
> Of course it does. My implied belief is that the former takes longer
> than the latter. I would be surprised if this is not true, unless his
> team only consists of two or three people.
>
> The decision is clearly dependent not just on each person's effort,
> but on how many people are in the equation.
>
> --
> Jeffrey Horn
> Graduate Lecturer and PhD Student in Economics
> George Mason University
>
> (704) 271-4797
> jhorn@gmu.edu
> jrhorn424@gmail.com
>
> http://www.failuretorefrain.com/jeff/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Emacs-orgmode mailing list
> Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
> Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
>

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 3206 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 201 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode

  reply	other threads:[~2010-10-27 18:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-10-26 16:49 General question on dealing with Latex to word conversion Marvin Doyley
2010-10-26 17:13 ` Graham Smith
2010-10-26 17:46   ` Marvin Doyley
2010-10-26 18:12     ` Graham Smith
2010-10-26 22:40     ` Tomas Hlavaty
2010-10-27 14:15       ` Graham Smith
2010-10-26 18:42 ` Jambunathan K
2010-10-26 20:45   ` Marvin Doyley
2010-10-26 19:48 ` Russell Adams
2010-10-26 20:47   ` Marvin Doyley
2010-10-26 22:46     ` Russell Adams
2010-10-27  3:31 ` Richard Lawrence
2010-10-27 11:24   ` Jeff Horn
2010-10-27 14:57     ` Richard Lawrence
2010-10-27 15:02       ` Jeff Horn
2010-10-27 18:41         ` Marvin Doyley [this message]
2010-10-28  7:21           ` Eric S Fraga
2010-10-28  8:37             ` [WISH] Org Importers Jambunathan K
2010-10-28  9:15               ` Scot Becker
2010-10-28 10:16                 ` Peter Frings
2010-10-28 17:23                   ` Eric S Fraga
2010-10-28 10:15               ` Eric S Fraga
2010-10-28 11:33                 ` Jambunathan K
2010-10-28 11:38                   ` Eric S Fraga
2010-10-29  0:00               ` Matt Lundin
2010-10-29  2:18                 ` Jeff Horn
2010-10-29 17:06                   ` Matt Lundin
2010-10-29 10:17                 ` Eric S Fraga
2011-02-02 22:35                 ` Bastien
2010-10-29  0:23 ` General question on dealing with Latex to word conversion Matt Lundin
2010-10-30 11:18   ` Marvin Doyley
2010-10-30 11:53     ` Jambunathan K
2010-10-30 11:45   ` Marvin Doyley
2010-11-01  0:30     ` Matt Lundin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.orgmode.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=AANLkTikndZCkesvYJ6vVhQHqdHb3iRjF1gQQmahTHY9n@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=marvinpas@gmail.com \
    --cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
    --cc=jrhorn424@gmail.com \
    --cc=richard.lawrence@berkeley.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).