Re: Splitting mailing list

From: Matthew Sauer <improv.philosophy@gmail.com>
To: Alan L Tyree <alantyree@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Splitting mailing list
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 18:21:12 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTik6_1KnQahJPxOsz-us4iP-TUEKEGX1sPm71S=v@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110228111553.0e55af63.alantyree@gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2409 bytes --]

I think that if it was kept as a single list the use of tags could allow (as
long as people respect the tags) to filter and read only the types of
threads they want to use.

If we split the lists I would tag both with the same tag in my gmail box and
read them all together, so it wouldn't really appear to be any different for
me other than the people only reading dev tags or on the dev channel
wouldn't see the user discussions.

On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Alan L Tyree <alantyree@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sun, 27 Feb 2011 17:53:44 -0500
> "Andrew J. Korty" <ajk@iu.edu> wrote:
>
> > Alan L Tyree <alantyree@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I'm purely a user, but I would not be in favour of splitting the
> > > list. I find it interesting to have an insight into what the
> > > developers are doing, where org is headed.  Use of a DEV tag would
> > > be good.
> >
> > I don't understand.  If you like to read the development posts, why
> > not subscribe to both lists?  My concerns with a DEV tag are twofold:
> > people would forget to add it, and it clutters the subject line.
>
> The development list wouldn't be very interesting without the intense
> interaction that it now has with users. The org list seems unique in
> this, at least for the lists that I have sometimes monitored.
>
> I take your point about the tags, however. No happy answer to any of
> this.
>
> Cheers,
> Alan
>
> >
> > Samuel Wales <samologist@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > The thing that is most difficult for me is the fact that I almost
> > > never can read the entire subject header.  Often I get to read only
> > > the first word.  Tags will make that worse.
> >
> > It was suggested once that we shorten the [Orgmode] tag to [Org].
> > That seems like a change everyone can agree with.  Could one of the
> > mailing list admins please make that change?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > ajk
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Emacs-orgmode mailing list
> > Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
> > Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
> > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
> >
>
>
> --
> Alan L Tyree                    http://www2.austlii.edu.au/~alan
> Tel:  04 2748 6206
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Emacs-orgmode mailing list
> Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
> Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
>

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 3462 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 201 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode