From: Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk>
To: Matthew Sauer <improv.philosophy@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Alan L Tyree <alantyree@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Splitting mailing list
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 20:43:39 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ei6rvqis.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTik6_1KnQahJPxOsz-us4iP-TUEKEGX1sPm71S=v@mail.gmail.com> (Matthew Sauer's message of "Sun, 27 Feb 2011 18:21:12 -0600")
Matthew Sauer <improv.philosophy@gmail.com> writes:
> I think that if it was kept as a single list the use of tags could allow (as
> long as people respect the tags) to filter and read only the types of
> threads they want to use.
>
> If we split the lists I would tag both with the same tag in my gmail box and
> read them all together, so it wouldn't really appear to be any different for
> me other than the people only reading dev tags or on the dev channel
> wouldn't see the user discussions.
I'm happy either way as I am interested in all org related emails. If
split, I would see no difference in the end: the emails from the two
lists would end up back in the same list for me as I use filtering (gnus
splitting to be precise) to distribute my many emails automatically to
their appropriate folders.
However, I don't think the volume in this list is that large, assuming
readers are using smart mail tools. Especially with threading, it's
relatively easy to delete or ignore whole threads at once if they are
not of interest. Not that I do that very often with org threads, mind
you ;-)
--
: Eric S Fraga (GnuPG: 0xC89193D8FFFCF67D) in Emacs 24.0.50.1
: using Org-mode version 7.4 (release_7.4.553.g83b7.dirty)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-28 20:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-27 10:30 Splitting mailing list Julien Danjou
2011-02-27 11:43 ` Bastien
2011-02-27 14:09 ` Julien Danjou
2011-02-27 14:19 ` Gour
2011-02-27 14:22 ` Matthew Sauer
2011-02-27 20:49 ` Alan L Tyree
2011-02-27 22:53 ` Andrew J. Korty
2011-02-28 0:15 ` Alan L Tyree
2011-02-28 0:21 ` Matthew Sauer
2011-02-28 20:43 ` Eric S Fraga [this message]
2011-02-28 8:48 ` Julien Danjou
2011-02-28 9:48 ` Alan Tyree
2011-02-28 2:38 ` Nick Dokos
2011-02-28 10:46 ` Bastien
2011-02-28 12:12 ` Julien Danjou
2011-02-28 12:44 ` Bastien
2011-02-28 12:58 ` Jambunathan K
2011-02-28 14:14 ` Julien Danjou
2011-02-28 16:14 ` Nick Dokos
2011-02-28 17:12 ` John Hendy
2011-03-01 11:50 ` Bastien
2011-02-27 21:20 ` Jeff Horn
2011-02-27 21:26 ` Jeff Horn
2011-02-27 22:20 ` Samuel Wales
2011-02-28 10:49 ` Bastien
2011-02-28 15:03 ` Ian Barton
2011-02-28 17:05 ` Samuel Wales
2011-02-28 20:17 ` Konrad Hinsen
2011-02-27 16:23 ` Chris Thompson
2011-02-27 16:56 ` Julien Danjou
2011-02-28 9:50 ` Torsten Wagner
2011-02-28 11:02 ` Let's stick to one list for now (was: Splitting mailing list) Bastien
2011-02-28 11:34 ` Let's stick to one list for now Julien Danjou
2011-02-28 17:06 ` Eric Schulte
2011-02-28 17:09 ` Automatic Org-mode mailing list signature -- Was: [O] " Eric Schulte
2011-02-28 18:14 ` Automatic Org-mode mailing list signature -- Was: " Nicolas
2011-02-28 18:58 ` Eric Schulte
2011-03-01 4:30 ` Automatic Org-mode mailing list signature -- Was: [O] " theo
2011-03-02 17:35 ` Bastien
2011-03-02 17:54 ` Eric Schulte
2011-03-02 18:22 ` Automatic Org-mode mailing list signature -- Was: " Nicolas
2011-03-02 18:51 ` theo
2011-03-03 8:25 ` Bastien
2011-03-03 8:36 ` Gregor Zattler
2011-03-03 13:49 ` Eric S Fraga
2011-03-03 14:01 ` Bernt Hansen
2011-03-03 15:09 ` Julien Danjou
2011-03-03 15:12 ` Carsten Dominik
2011-03-03 16:33 ` Bastien
2011-03-03 17:02 ` Achim Gratz
2011-03-03 17:53 ` Nick Dokos
2011-03-04 9:57 ` Julien Danjou
2011-03-02 21:44 ` Automatic Org-mode mailing list signature -- Was: [O] " Achim Gratz
2011-03-02 22:59 ` suvayu ali
2011-03-03 8:23 ` Bastien
2011-02-28 17:53 ` Dan Davison
2011-02-28 18:10 ` Jambunathan K
2011-02-28 20:23 ` Jeff Horn
2011-03-01 11:55 ` Bastien
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.orgmode.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ei6rvqis.fsf@ucl.ac.uk \
--to=e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk \
--cc=alantyree@gmail.com \
--cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
--cc=improv.philosophy@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).