Re: New beamer support

From: "Sébastien Vauban" <wxhgmqzgwmuf-geNee64TY+gS+FvcfC7Uqw@public.gmane.org>
To: emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: New beamer support
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2010 20:24:00 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87zl4phg6n.fsf@mundaneum.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 4b4621fe.e402be0a.7dfd.ffffdb7a@mx.google.com

Hi Darlan,

Darlan Cavalcante Moreira wrote:
> I agree that it is useful to have an easy way to specify one or more options
> for every frame, but from the beamer manual I understand that these options
> where created for specific cases and IMHO org shouldn't include any frame
> option by default.

I don't think I (or we) said it should be that way by default. My "request" is
just to be sure we have a manner to tell Org so.

I proposed an explicit meta-tag for the whole Org document, but the BIND
meta-tag option is good for me, as long as it does not disappear! ;-)

> About the fragile option, the beamer manual tells you when to use it, but
> doesn't mention any drawbacks of its use. I also tried searching for
> problems with the fragile option but I found nothing and therefore I do not
> know the implications of enabling the fragile option in every frame.
> However, if there is no drawbacks then I wonder why the beamer author didn't
> make it the default behavior.
>
> Maybe it is better to ask in a beamer mailing list the implications of
> setting this option for every frame.

As said by Carsten, reason is performance...

Best regards,
  Seb

-- 
Sébastien Vauban

_______________________________________________
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode