From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
To: Scott Randby <srandby@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-org list <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Stable releases
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 15:39:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87zj1w62yk.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55CA2E6B.4060102@gmail.com> (Scott Randby's message of "Tue, 11 Aug 2015 13:18:35 -0400")
Hello,
Scott Randby <srandby@gmail.com> writes:
> When I started using 8.3, I discovered that the behavior of commented
> headlines had been changed---a change with which I disagree, a change
> I could not find in the release notes, and one which forces me to
> alter a huge number of files. It seems I missed the discussion about
> commented headlines on the mailing list. This is due to my limited
> knowledge of elisp and programming in general, a gap which makes it
> difficult for me to follow the more technical discussions on the
> mailing list. While it has been explained to me that the change is
> a feature, I consider it to be a serious bug since it is not backwards
> compatible.
I think this change is good. COMMENT status of headlines was muddy
before. The only information about them was the following excerpt (from
Org 8.2.9's manual)
Also entire subtrees starting with the word ‘COMMENT’ will never be
exported.
which can mean many things. You extrapolated this definition to one of
its possible meanings, but your definition, AFAIU, was :noexport:
tags's.
Now there is a clearer definition of a COMMENT headline, and a clear
distinction between COMMENT and :noexport:.
Note that you don't have to alter any of your files. The following
function can do it for you on the fly, before each export. You can also
used it to effectively alter your files automatically for you.
(defun my-comment-to-noexport (backend)
(interactive)
(goto-char (point-min))
(while (re-search-forward "^\\*+.*\\( COMMENT\\)" nil t)
(when (save-match-data (org-in-commented-heading-p t))
(replace-match "" nil nil nil 1)
(org-set-tags-to (cons "noexport" (org-get-tags))))))
(add-hook 'org-export-before-processing-hook #'my-comment-to-noexport)
I admit it could have been notified in ORG-NEWS.
> Another issue I had with 8.3 is the deletion of the
> org-latex-with-hyperref variable, something I could not find in the
> release notes (maybe I missed it). I understand that having Org insert
> \hypersetup{...} details is the most desirable situation, but I fail
> to see the harm in keeping org-latex-with-hyperref for those of us who
> needed it in the past. Yes, I figured out a fix, but this is a fix
> that forces me to stick with an outmoded way of doing things, and so
> I consider this deletion to be a bug.
I'm not sure to understand. What is wrong with setting
`org-latex-hyperref-template' to the empty string?
This change was introduced in Feb 2014. It is a step forward since we
move from an opt-in/opt-out to a full customizable template.
I overlooked the fact that this replacement wasn't signaled in ORG-NEWS,
tho. I will try to be more careful for next release.
> I do understand that all software has bugs, and that everyone working
> on Org is doing so voluntarily (thank you so much for your wonderful
> work). But I was very surprised to find that the evaluation of table
> formulas didn't work in 8.3.1. I could see something like this
> happening in the development version, but it is somewhat mysterious to
> me how such a bug could make its way into a stable release.
I introduced these changes a short time (three days) before release.
I made an announcement[fn:1] in order to warn there could be some
hiccups in that area. It may be obnoxious for you, but no bug was
reported before release.
Another example is the recent columns view bug report[fn:2]. The faulty
commit was pushed 2 months ago. Yet no one during development phase
complained about column view being broken. Even a feature freeze period
wouldn't have helped in that case.
You can't really avoid small glitches after a release.
> I guess what I want to know, and maybe there is no answer, is how long
> should I wait before upgrading to a stable release? Org is by far the
> most important piece of software I use (I hate it when I can't use
> Org), and bugs (which I know can't be avoided) make it hard, even
> impossible, for me to get my real work done. If there is a way for me
> to minimize encountering bugs, I will appreciate a description of that
> way.
I suggest to only do regularly minor updates (e.g. 8.3.1 -> 8.3.2). For
major updates, make sure you have some time to spare for bug reporting.
I think we are usually pretty responsive when it comes to bugs.
Regards,
[fn:1] <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/99415>
[fn:2] <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/99865>
--
Nicolas Goaziou
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-12 13:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-11 17:18 Stable releases Scott Randby
2015-08-11 18:33 ` Ista Zahn
2015-08-11 19:34 ` Suvayu Ali
2015-08-11 20:56 ` Rasmus
2015-08-12 16:14 ` Scott Randby
2015-08-12 13:39 ` Nicolas Goaziou [this message]
2015-08-12 14:38 ` Peter Salazar
2015-08-12 15:57 ` Scott Randby
2015-08-12 22:56 ` Rasmus
2015-08-18 16:44 ` Bastien
2015-08-18 17:30 ` Bastien
2015-08-12 17:37 ` Achim Gratz
2015-08-12 19:06 ` Scott Randby
2015-08-13 9:32 ` Eric S Fraga
2015-08-13 13:28 ` Scott Randby
2015-08-18 17:36 ` Bastien
2015-08-18 17:52 ` Scott Randby
2015-08-18 20:40 ` Russell Adams
2015-08-18 22:26 ` Bastien
2015-08-19 20:00 ` Rasmus
2015-08-20 23:03 ` Bastien
2015-08-20 23:56 ` Thomas S. Dye
2015-08-21 7:21 ` Suvayu Ali
2015-08-22 17:32 ` Thomas S. Dye
2015-08-22 17:44 ` Achim Gratz
2015-08-22 17:55 ` Thomas S. Dye
2015-08-22 18:00 ` Achim Gratz
2015-08-22 18:23 ` Thomas S. Dye
2015-08-22 18:53 ` Thomas S. Dye
2015-08-22 18:57 ` Achim Gratz
2015-08-22 19:06 ` Thomas S. Dye
2015-08-21 18:37 ` Rasmus
2015-08-19 8:51 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2015-08-19 9:36 ` Bastien
2015-08-19 14:51 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2015-08-19 19:57 ` Rasmus
2016-01-17 10:12 ` Losing trust in Org: stable org-mode releases and unit tests for basic functionality Karl Voit
2016-01-17 10:30 ` Achim Gratz
2016-01-18 13:47 ` Karl Voit
2016-01-17 13:41 ` Marco Wahl
2016-01-18 14:06 ` Karl Voit
2016-01-19 9:00 ` Marco Wahl
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.orgmode.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87zj1w62yk.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr \
--to=mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr \
--cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
--cc=srandby@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).