From: Marco Wahl <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: Colin Baxter <email@example.com> Cc: Marco Wahl <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Tim Cross <email@example.com>, firstname.lastname@example.org Subject: Re: [WDYT] org-attach-sync better remove an empty attachment directory? Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2021 19:36:27 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <email@example.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <firstname.lastname@example.org> (Colin Baxter's message of "Thu, 08 Jul 2021 09:28:54 +0100") Marco> Please recall that only empty attachment directories would be Marco> removed, so removal of a directory--and in particular one Marco> that existed before its interpretation as Org Marco> attachment--wouldn't be a big deal AFAICS. Tim> Not as confident here. I can imagine workflows and other Tim> external scripts which might expect a specific directory Tim> structure that could be broken if a directory was removed (even Tim> when empty). Hence my suggestion it needs to be something you Tim> can turn off. Tim> Likely this is something which should be controllable via a Tim> custom setting? Marco> To be honest I'd rather not make another customizable thing Marco> out of it to keep the overall complexity low. Marco> Marco> OTOH we could easily introduce e.g. customizable Marco> org-attach-delete-empty-dirs-on-sync. Tim> Appreciate the problem with far too many customization options, Tim> but when it comes to software 'automatically' doing something, Tim> like removal of an empty directory, especially when it might Tim> not have been responsible for creation of the directory, it is Tim> better to provide some way to allow the user to turn off the Tim> behaviour. I would default to having it enabled though. Colin> I'm afraid I for one often have empty attach directories Colin> which I leave alone knowing that one day soon - sometimes Colin> very soon - they will be used again. Cannot the user be asked Colin> if he wants the directory removed? Thanks Tim and Colin. We could introduce multiple possibilities to choose from. 1. Ask in case of an empty directory if it should be deleted. 2. Don't ask. Don't touch an empty directory. (The state now.) 3. Don't ask. Delete empty directory. We could also make 3. the default setting.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-08 18:36 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-07-07 20:15 Marco Wahl 2021-07-08 0:34 ` Tim Cross 2021-07-08 7:45 ` Marco Wahl 2021-07-08 7:56 ` Tim Cross 2021-07-08 8:28 ` Colin Baxter 2021-07-08 17:36 ` Marco Wahl [this message] 2021-07-08 18:53 ` Marco Wahl 2021-07-08 19:28 ` Tim Cross 2021-07-09 6:15 ` Colin Baxter 2021-07-09 19:18 ` Marco Wahl 2021-07-10 13:20 ` Colin Baxter
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style List information: https://www.orgmode.org/ * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --email@example.com \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --email@example.com \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --email@example.com \ --subject='Re: [WDYT] org-attach-sync better remove an empty attachment directory?' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this inbox: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).