emacs-orgmode@gnu.org archives
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us>
To: bzg@gnu.org
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Should org-narrow-to-subtree be disabled by default?
Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2014 16:50:40 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87mwjdxdwv.fsf@gmx.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8761q1cbxc.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> (Bastien's message of "Fri, 03 Jan 2014 16:39:11 +0100")

Bastien <bzg@gnu.org> writes:

> Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us> writes:
>
>> Bastien <bzg@gnu.org> writes:
>>
>>> one good way to decide could be to ask people here if they ever
>>> accidentally narrowed the view to a subtree -- I never did.
>>
>> No.  But I know the concept of narrowing, which may be unfamiliar to
>> some.  I find narrowing super useful, especially when writing longer
>> documents.
>
> I checked narrow-to-defun, and it is not disabled by default, only
> narrow-to-region and narrow-to-page, which are both accessible in any
> mode.
>
> As org-narrow-to-* functions are only accessible from org-mode buffers
> and not that easily called by accident (I haven't seen any report like
> this in years), I suggest we stick to the current setup.

Fine with me.

>>> Also, I tend to think Emacs is on the paranoid side here, I don't
>>> think newbies can hit C-x n n accidentally...
>>
>> Perhaps an easier way to narrow by accident is through
>> org-speed-commands-default, i.e. speedkey "s".
>
> Yes, but newbies don't use speed commands without knowing what they
> do, do they?

Probably not since org-use-speed-commands is nil by default.

-- 
A page of history is worth a volume of logic

      reply	other threads:[~2014-01-03 15:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-11-23 13:55 Should org-narrow-to-subtree be disabled by default? Jisang Yoo
2013-11-23 15:25 ` Bastien
2013-11-23 15:53   ` Rasmus
2014-01-03 15:39     ` Bastien
2014-01-03 15:50       ` Rasmus [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.orgmode.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87mwjdxdwv.fsf@gmx.us \
    --to=rasmus@gmx.us \
    --cc=bzg@gnu.org \
    --cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).