emacs-orgmode@gnu.org archives
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk>
To: Tomas Grigera <tgrigera@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Problem (bug?) evaluating octave code ("function name does not agree with file name)
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2015 20:38:48 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87mvxol73r.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJMNdQKk8qgBr70L=grFo6sg_z7B1oEEPVjNuPD9iTYF0MnsyA@mail.gmail.com> (Tomas Grigera's message of "Tue, 18 Aug 2015 10:42:11 -0300")

On Tuesday, 18 Aug 2015 at 10:42, Tomas Grigera wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> I am a very happy user of orgmode and babel.  I recently picked up a
> document from last year, and found that code blocks that used to
> evaluate fine now don't.  A code block like this

[...]

> There has been some change, of which I am unaware, in the way babel
> handles this block that leads to this behaviour.  However, it seems to
> me that it is a well-formed block and should evaluate fine.  Am I
> wrong?

Just to confirm that you are not wrong and I ran into this a while ago
now.  That is, problems with functions defined in the middle of the code
as opposed to functions in their own .m files.  I didn't have time to
figure out what was wrong at the time due to deadlines so found other
ways of doing what I wanted including @(x) function definitions.

The strange thing is that babel seems to not leave any code in the /tmp
files it creates so I cannot see what code org babel is trying to execute.

-- 
: Eric S Fraga (0xFFFCF67D), Emacs 25.0.50.2, Org release_8.3.1-117-gc98729

  reply	other threads:[~2015-08-18 19:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-08-18 13:42 Problem (bug?) evaluating octave code ("function name does not agree with file name) Tomas Grigera
2015-08-18 19:38 ` Eric S Fraga [this message]
2015-08-18 21:10   ` Tomas Grigera

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.orgmode.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87mvxol73r.fsf@ucl.ac.uk \
    --to=e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk \
    --cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
    --cc=tgrigera@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).