From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: Problem (bug?) evaluating octave code ("function name does not
 agree with file name)
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2015 20:38:48 +0100
Message-ID: <87mvxol73r.fsf@ucl.ac.uk>
References: <CAJMNdQKk8qgBr70L=grFo6sg_z7B1oEEPVjNuPD9iTYF0MnsyA@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48377)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk>) id 1ZRmit-0005LT-J1
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Aug 2015 15:39:04 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk>) id 1ZRmio-0002si-Bb
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Aug 2015 15:39:03 -0400
Received: from mail-am1on0146.outbound.protection.outlook.com
	([157.56.112.146]:54880
	helo=emea01-am1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk>) id 1ZRmio-0002rc-2C
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Aug 2015 15:38:58 -0400
In-Reply-To: <CAJMNdQKk8qgBr70L=grFo6sg_z7B1oEEPVjNuPD9iTYF0MnsyA@mail.gmail.com>
	(Tomas Grigera's message of "Tue, 18 Aug 2015 10:42:11 -0300")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Tomas Grigera <tgrigera@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

On Tuesday, 18 Aug 2015 at 10:42, Tomas Grigera wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> I am a very happy user of orgmode and babel.  I recently picked up a
> document from last year, and found that code blocks that used to
> evaluate fine now don't.  A code block like this

[...]

> There has been some change, of which I am unaware, in the way babel
> handles this block that leads to this behaviour.  However, it seems to
> me that it is a well-formed block and should evaluate fine.  Am I
> wrong?

Just to confirm that you are not wrong and I ran into this a while ago
now.  That is, problems with functions defined in the middle of the code
as opposed to functions in their own .m files.  I didn't have time to
figure out what was wrong at the time due to deadlines so found other
ways of doing what I wanted including @(x) function definitions.

The strange thing is that babel seems to not leave any code in the /tmp
files it creates so I cannot see what code org babel is trying to execute.

-- 
: Eric S Fraga (0xFFFCF67D), Emacs 25.0.50.2, Org release_8.3.1-117-gc98729