From: TEC <firstname.lastname@example.org>
To: org-mode-email <email@example.com>
Subject: Tables: missing multi-col/row syntax
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2020 02:14:33 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <firstname.lastname@example.org> (raw)
This is a pretty major 'feature request', but I think also an
When developing large tables, it can often be /necessary/ to start
multi-column/row cells for clarity, and sensible exporting
As far as I am aware, in Org does not currently have any
syntax. The only viable method seems to be re-implementing the
using export blocks in every backend you may want to export to (in
case, usually TeX + HTML). This is clumsy, difficult to work with,
could be avoided should org gain support for multi-col/row syntax.
I appreciate that this would constitute a major change both the
syntax and the codebase, but I believe such a change is warranted
advantages it would provide.
Both how this can be implemented while minimising/eliminating the
of breaking well-formed current table elements, and what syntax
both acceptable and seem sensible to use.
I would anticipate such a feature working by designating two
to indicate "add row" and "add column". For example "|" and "-".
characters would take affect when /immediately following/ (no
cell separator ("|"), and designate the dimensions of the top
| a | b | c |
| a | - | | |
| - | b | . |
| . | | | c |
Would be interpreted just as any current table is.
| hello | there | you |
|| two column | cell |
Contains a 2x1 cell.
| a little | test |
|- hello | hi |
| two row | you |
Contains a 1x2 cell. In a more complex example:
| a | b | c |
||-- hi | a |
| two x | . |
| three | b |
| c | - | . |
Contains a 2x3 cell.
This is just the first syntax that comes to mind, but hopefully
general form of this idea seems viable.
All the best,
next reply other threads:[~2020-11-02 18:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-02 18:14 TEC [this message]
2020-11-02 19:45 ` Tables: missing multi-col/row syntax Tom Gillespie
2020-11-02 19:46 ` TEC
2020-11-04 9:23 ` Christian Moe
2020-11-04 9:28 ` TEC
2020-11-03 10:08 ` David Rogers
2020-11-03 10:35 ` TEC
2020-11-04 2:45 ` David Rogers
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
List information: https://www.orgmode.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).