From: Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us>
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug, patch, ox] INCLUDE and footnotes
Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 22:21:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87fvcozfhf.fsf@gmx.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87oarcbppe.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> (Nicolas Goaziou's message of "Tue, 09 Dec 2014 20:14:37 +0100")
Hi,
Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes:
> First `org-footnote-section' could be nil, in which case there is no
> headline to look after.
Sure.
> Also, there may be multiple footnote sections in the included document,
> or even some footnote definitions inside and some outside the single
> section...
Multiple footnote sections are supported in the second revision of the
patch...
> You should only extract the definitions associated to the references
> within the included part of the document. However, you cannot insert
> them right after the included text, as it could break the surrounding
> environment, e.g.,
>
> - item
>
> #+INCLUDE: some-table.org
>
> A possible solution would be to somehow postpone insertion of footnotes
> at the very end of the source document, not at the location of the
> keyword. However it would need some testing.
Right, I note something similar in my second post.
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/93299
Clearly the current situation is not satisfactory ("You can use :lines,
but only if no footnotes are present. . . IOW, :lines supports a subset
of Org syntax.").
I prefer converting [fn:N] references to [fn::FOOTNOTE] (see my other
email). Any obvious downsides?
—Rasmus
--
Vote for proprietary math!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-09 21:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-09 11:44 [bug, patch, ox] INCLUDE and footnotes Rasmus
2014-12-09 19:10 ` Rasmus
2014-12-09 19:14 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2014-12-09 21:21 ` Rasmus [this message]
2014-12-09 21:37 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2014-12-10 0:57 ` Rasmus
2014-12-10 11:21 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2014-12-10 11:58 ` Rasmus
2014-12-10 15:44 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2014-12-13 21:45 ` Rasmus
2014-12-17 23:30 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2014-12-18 17:37 ` Rasmus
2014-12-19 16:44 ` Rasmus
2014-12-21 21:04 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2014-12-21 22:39 ` Rasmus
2014-12-21 23:38 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2014-12-22 1:42 ` Rasmus
2014-12-22 9:05 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2014-12-24 18:03 ` Rasmus
2014-12-24 21:14 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2014-12-25 1:38 ` Rasmus
2014-12-25 2:04 ` Rasmus
2014-12-21 20:52 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2014-12-22 1:49 ` Rasmus
2014-12-22 11:10 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2014-12-22 12:36 ` Rasmus
2014-12-22 20:54 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2014-12-22 22:11 ` Rasmus
2014-12-22 22:51 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2014-12-23 2:09 ` Rasmus
2014-12-24 17:54 ` Rasmus
2014-12-24 18:10 ` [git-101] How to push a branch and avoid merge-message? (was: [bug, patch, ox] INCLUDE and footnotes) Rasmus
2014-12-24 21:09 ` [git-101] How to push a branch and avoid merge-message? Nicolas Goaziou
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.orgmode.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87fvcozfhf.fsf@gmx.us \
--to=rasmus@gmx.us \
--cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).