emacs-orgmode@gnu.org archives
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
To: Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug, patch, ox] INCLUDE and footnotes
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 23:51:37 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <878uhz47t2.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87vbl3z65i.fsf@gmx.us> (rasmus@gmx.us's message of "Mon, 22 Dec 2014 23:11:37 +0100")

Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us> writes:

>>> * Foo
>>> [1] foo
>>>
>>> * Bar
>>> Baz[1]
>>
>> I'm not sure to understand. Would you mind elaborating?
>
> If I have #+INCLUDE: "example-above.org::*Bar" then point-min of the
> include area will be pushed forward by four since the definition of [1] is
> changed to fn:1-1 or something like that.  So min-marker should be a
> marker.  Or I'm misunderstanding something.

No, you're right. However, this raises a question: why are we modifying
definition at all? We are only interested in its new label, which we can
get without modifying buffer (i.e. if definition is within range, modify
it, otherwise, compute new label and store its definition).

Anyway, it doesn't matter much. The marker is fine, indeed.

> Since it's soon Christmas, so I could perhaps accommodate.

I ensure you I have mostly been kind all year long.

> +		    (org-with-wide-buffer
> +		     (let* ((definition (org-footnote-get-definition label))
> +			    (beginning (line-beginning-position)))

There's one potential problem here: `org-footnote-get-definition' may
return a nil value if there is no matching definition for label. Maybe
throw an error?

Also, BEGINNING should refer to (nth 1 definition) since you're not
using `org-footnote-goto-definition' and therefore, not moving point.

I think you can push once the issues above are fixed. Thank you for the
work.


Regards,

  reply	other threads:[~2014-12-22 22:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-12-09 11:44 [bug, patch, ox] INCLUDE and footnotes Rasmus
2014-12-09 19:10 ` Rasmus
2014-12-09 19:14 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2014-12-09 21:21   ` Rasmus
2014-12-09 21:37     ` Nicolas Goaziou
2014-12-10  0:57       ` Rasmus
2014-12-10 11:21         ` Nicolas Goaziou
2014-12-10 11:58           ` Rasmus
2014-12-10 15:44             ` Nicolas Goaziou
2014-12-13 21:45               ` Rasmus
2014-12-17 23:30                 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2014-12-18 17:37                   ` Rasmus
2014-12-19 16:44                     ` Rasmus
2014-12-21 21:04                       ` Nicolas Goaziou
2014-12-21 22:39                         ` Rasmus
2014-12-21 23:38                           ` Nicolas Goaziou
2014-12-22  1:42                             ` Rasmus
2014-12-22  9:05                               ` Nicolas Goaziou
2014-12-24 18:03                                 ` Rasmus
2014-12-24 21:14                                   ` Nicolas Goaziou
2014-12-25  1:38                                     ` Rasmus
2014-12-25  2:04                                     ` Rasmus
2014-12-21 20:52                     ` Nicolas Goaziou
2014-12-22  1:49                       ` Rasmus
2014-12-22 11:10                         ` Nicolas Goaziou
2014-12-22 12:36                           ` Rasmus
2014-12-22 20:54                             ` Nicolas Goaziou
2014-12-22 22:11                               ` Rasmus
2014-12-22 22:51                                 ` Nicolas Goaziou [this message]
2014-12-23  2:09                                   ` Rasmus
2014-12-24 17:54                                   ` Rasmus
2014-12-24 18:10                                     ` [git-101] How to push a branch and avoid merge-message? (was: [bug, patch, ox] INCLUDE and footnotes) Rasmus
2014-12-24 21:09                                       ` [git-101] How to push a branch and avoid merge-message? Nicolas Goaziou

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.orgmode.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=878uhz47t2.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr \
    --to=mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr \
    --cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
    --cc=rasmus@gmx.us \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).