From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
To: Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [ox, patch] #+SUBTITLE
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 09:39:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87a8yv0w8v.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87bnjct08z.fsf@gmx.us> (rasmus@gmx.us's message of "Sun, 29 Mar 2015 15:13:32 +0200")
Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us> writes:
> Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes:
>> Do you mean KEYWORD and DESCRIPTION should also belong to category 1?
>> I'm not against it, but then, back-ends are required to support them
>> whenever possible.
>
> At the moment they are. They lack ascii support, but at least keywords
> should be supported in ascii eventually IMO (but that's another thread).
>
> So I would keep them. The documentation explicitly states which backend
> these keywords are supported by.
OK. Then DESCRIPTION and KEYWORD stay in "ox.el", and documented in
"Export settings". You need to revert your patch about it.
We will have to take care about support for missing back-ends. E.g.,
ASCII could treat DESCRIPTION as a quote box just below title.
>>> We could add a subsection with "text document properties" which are
>>> keywords that are supported by the set: {ox-html, ox-ascii, ox-odt,
>>> ox-latex}. These would be sort of 1½ class citizens.
>>
>> I don't want to create a third category (à la
>> `org-element-document-properties', which I'm trying to remove).
>
> This category would not exists in the code. It would simply be a
> classification that exists in the manual. I would be a hack to not
> maintain "no. of backend that support SOME_KEYWORD" different places to
> maintain documentation for SOME_KEYWORD.
I don't think it is needed. Such "text document properties" are de facto
members of category 1 anyway.
Regards,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-30 7:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-27 14:19 [ox, patch] #+SUBTITLE Rasmus
2015-03-27 15:08 ` Andreas Leha
2015-03-27 15:12 ` Rasmus
2015-03-27 15:35 ` Andreas Leha
2015-03-28 15:40 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2015-03-28 15:55 ` Rasmus
2015-03-28 17:15 ` Thomas S. Dye
2015-03-29 9:44 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2015-03-29 11:50 ` Rasmus
2015-03-29 13:05 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2015-03-29 13:13 ` Rasmus
2015-03-30 7:39 ` Nicolas Goaziou [this message]
2015-03-30 10:35 ` Rasmus
2015-03-31 10:18 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2015-03-31 10:35 ` Rasmus
2015-03-31 10:47 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2015-03-31 15:50 ` [org.texi] New keywords tables (was: [ox, patch] #+SUBTITLE) Rasmus
2015-03-31 20:33 ` [org.texi] New keywords tables Nicolas Goaziou
2015-03-31 21:57 ` Rasmus
2015-04-01 11:53 ` Rasmus
2015-04-01 19:37 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2015-04-01 21:55 ` Rasmus
2015-04-01 22:34 ` [ox, patch] #+SUBTITLE Rasmus
2015-04-08 21:25 ` Rasmus
2015-03-29 11:16 ` Rasmus
2015-03-31 10:21 ` Nicolas Goaziou
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.orgmode.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87a8yv0w8v.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr \
--to=mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr \
--cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
--cc=rasmus@gmx.us \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).